• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜、机器人和开放性肾输尿管切除术联合膀胱袖套切除治疗 T3T4 期上尿路尿路上皮癌的疗效:一项多中心回顾性研究。

Outcomes of laparoscopic, robotic and open nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision in patients with T3T4 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical university, Taichung, Taiwan.

Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01622-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12894-024-01622-5
PMID:39434129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11492713/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision is the standard treatment for high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The role of minimally invasive surgery in treating locally advanced UTUC remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgeries for managing locally advanced UTUC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 705 patients with locally advanced UTUC from multiple institutions throughout Taiwan. Perioperative outcomes and oncological outcomes, such as cancer-specific survival, overall survival, disease-free survival and bladder-free survival, were compared between the open, laparoscopic and robotic groups.

RESULTS

The minimally invasive group had better overall and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates. The 2-year CSS rates of the open, laparoscopic and robotic groups were 71%, 83%, and 77% respectively (p < 0.001). The robotic group had similar outcomes to the laparoscopic group. (p = 0.061, 0.825, 0.341 for OS, CSS, DFS respectively.) More lymph node dissections were performed and more lymph nodes were harvested in the robotic group (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopic and robotic surgery, for locally advanced UTUC resulted in oncological outcomes that are non-inferior to those of open surgery.

摘要

背景

肾输尿管切除术联合膀胱袖状切除术是治疗高危上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的标准治疗方法。微创手术在治疗局部晚期 UTUC 中的作用仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较开放手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人手术治疗局部晚期 UTUC 的效果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了来自台湾多家机构的 705 例局部晚期 UTUC 患者的资料。比较了开放组、腹腔镜组和机器人组之间的围手术期和肿瘤学结果,如癌症特异性生存率、总生存率、无病生存率和无膀胱生存率。

结果

微创手术组的总体生存率和癌症特异性生存率(CSS)较好。开放组、腹腔镜组和机器人组的 2 年 CSS 率分别为 71%、83%和 77%(p<0.001)。机器人组的结果与腹腔镜组相似(OS、CSS、DFS 的 p 值分别为 0.061、0.825 和 0.341)。机器人组进行了更多的淋巴结清扫,也采集了更多的淋巴结(p=0.009)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,包括腹腔镜和机器人手术在内的微创手术治疗局部晚期 UTUC 的肿瘤学结果不劣于开放手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d38/11492713/22b03c59464e/12894_2024_1622_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d38/11492713/22b03c59464e/12894_2024_1622_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d38/11492713/22b03c59464e/12894_2024_1622_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes of laparoscopic, robotic and open nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision in patients with T3T4 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective study.腹腔镜、机器人和开放性肾输尿管切除术联合膀胱袖套切除治疗 T3T4 期上尿路尿路上皮癌的疗效:一项多中心回顾性研究。
BMC Urol. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01622-5.
2
Oncologic Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术联合膀胱袖口切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌后的肿瘤学结局
J Urol. 2015 Dec;194(6):1561-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.081. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
3
Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy Versus Open Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An European Association of Urology Guidelines Systematic Review.腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术与开放根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局:欧洲泌尿外科学会指南系统评价。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):205-223. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
4
The impact of bladder cuff excision on outcomes after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: An analysis of the ROBUUST 2.0 registry.膀胱袖口切除术对上尿路尿路上皮癌肾输尿管切除术后结局的影响:ROBUUST 2.0注册研究分析
Urol Oncol. 2024 Nov;42(11):373.e1-373.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.001. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
5
Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy is associated with worse survival outcomes than open radical nephroureterectomy in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma.对于局部晚期上尿路尿路上皮癌患者,腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术与开放性根治性肾输尿管切除术相比,生存结局更差。
World J Urol. 2016 Jun;34(6):859-69. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1712-3. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
6
Risk Factors for Intravesical Recurrence after Minimally Invasive Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer (ROBUUST Collaboration).微创肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌后膀胱内复发的危险因素(ROBUUST 协作组)。
J Urol. 2021 Sep;206(3):568-576. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001786. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
7
Comparison of oncological and perioperative outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic nephroureterectomy approaches in patients with non-metastatic upper-tract urothelial carcinoma.比较开放手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗非转移性上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学和围手术期结果。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 8;14(1):e0210401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210401. eCollection 2019.
8
Is Robotic Superior to Laparoscopic Approach for Radical Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision in Treating Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma?在治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌时,机器人辅助根治性肾输尿管切除术加膀胱袖状切除术是否优于腹腔镜手术?
J Endourol. 2023 Feb;37(2):139-146. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0154. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
9
Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy to treat localized and/or locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: oncological outcomes from a multicenter study.腹腔镜与开放肾输尿管切除术治疗局限性和/或局部进展性上尿路尿路上皮癌:一项多中心研究的肿瘤学结果
BMC Surg. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0202-x.
10
Association between lymphovascular invasion and oncological outcome in node-negative upper tract urothelial carcinoma with different stage.淋巴结阴性的不同分期上尿路上皮癌中淋巴管浸润与肿瘤学结果的关系。
Urol Oncol. 2021 Feb;39(2):132.e13-132.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Risk Stratification in pT3 Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Focus on Invasion Patterns.改善pT3上尿路尿路上皮癌的风险分层:关注浸润模式。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 8;17(6):923. doi: 10.3390/cancers17060923.

本文引用的文献

1
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy before Nephroureterectomy in High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高危上尿路尿路上皮癌肾输尿管切除术前行新辅助化疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 4;14(19):4841. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194841.
2
Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Trend Analysis of Utilization and a Comparative Study.机器人辅助根治性肾输尿管切除术联合膀胱袖状切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:应用趋势分析及对比研究
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 19;14(10):2497. doi: 10.3390/cancers14102497.
3
A retrospective multicenter comparison of conditional cancer-specific survival between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
回顾性多中心研究比较腹腔镜与开放性根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗局部晚期上尿路上皮癌的条件性癌症特异性生存。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 11;16(10):e0255965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255965. eCollection 2021.
4
Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局:更新的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr 21;19(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02236-z.
5
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
Adjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (the POUT trial): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.在上尿路尿路上皮癌中的辅助化疗(POUT 试验):一项 3 期、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 18;395(10232):1268-1277. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30415-3. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
7
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and minimally invasive nephroureterectomy: A population-based analysis.开放与微创肾输尿管切除术围手术期结局比较:基于人群的分析。
Int J Urol. 2019 Apr;26(4):487-492. doi: 10.1111/iju.13916. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
8
Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comparative Survival Analysis.机器人辅助手术治疗上尿路上皮癌:生存分析的比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;25(9):2550-2562. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6557-8. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
9
Potential Benefit of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌行淋巴结清扫术的潜在获益:欧洲泌尿外科学会非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌指南专家组的系统评价。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):224-241. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy Versus Open Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An European Association of Urology Guidelines Systematic Review.腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术与开放根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局:欧洲泌尿外科学会指南系统评价。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):205-223. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Nov 15.