• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少儿童轻微创伤性头部损伤影像学检查的干预措施:系统评价。

Interventions to Reduce Imaging in Children With Minor Traumatic Head Injury: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, College of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences Library.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2024 Dec 1;154(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2024-066955.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2024-066955
PMID:39483053
Abstract

CONTEXT

Reducing unnecessary imaging in emergency departments (EDs) for children with minor traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) has been encouraged.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to systematically review the effectiveness of interventions to decrease imaging in this population.

DATA SOURCES

Eight electronic databases and the gray literature were searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Comparative studies assessing ED interventions to reduce imaging in children with mTBIs were eligible.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent reviewers screened studies, completed a quality assessment, and extracted data. The median of relative risks with interquartile range (IQR) are reported. A multivariable metaregression identified predictors of relative change in imaging.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included, and most (79%) used before-after designs. The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) rule was the most common intervention (71%); most studies (75%) used multifaceted interventions (median components: 3; IQR: 1.75 to 4). Before-after studies assessing multi-faceted PECARN interventions reported decreased computed tomography (CT) head imaging (relative risk = 0.73; IQR: 0.60 to 0.89). Higher baseline imagine (P < .001) and additional intervention components (P = .008) were associated with larger imaging decreases.

LIMITATIONS

The limitations of this study include the inconsistent reporting of important outcomes and that the results are based on non-randomized studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing interventions in EDs with high baseline CT ordering using complex interventions was more likely to reduce head imaging in children with mTBIs. Including the PECARN decision rule in the intervention strategy decreased orders by a median of 27%. Further research could provide insight into which specific factors influence successful implementation and sustained effects.

摘要

背景

减少儿童轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者在急诊科(ED)进行不必要的影像学检查已得到鼓励。

目的

我们旨在系统地回顾干预措施减少该人群影像学检查的有效性。

数据来源

搜索了 8 个电子数据库和灰色文献。

研究选择

评估减少 mTBI 儿童 ED 影像学检查的干预措施的比较研究符合条件。

数据提取

两名独立审查员筛选研究,完成质量评估并提取数据。报告中位数及其四分位距(IQR)的相对风险。多变量荟萃回归确定了影像学相对变化的预测因素。

结果

共纳入 28 项研究,其中大多数(79%)采用前后设计。PECANR 规则是最常见的干预措施(71%);大多数研究(75%)采用多方面干预措施(中位数组成部分:3;IQR:1.75 至 4)。评估多方面 PECARN 干预措施的前后研究报告称,CT 头部成像减少(相对风险=0.73;IQR:0.60 至 0.89)。较高的基线想象(P<0.001)和更多的干预措施组成部分(P=0.008)与更大的成像减少相关。

局限性

本研究的局限性包括重要结果报告不一致,以及结果基于非随机研究。

结论

在 ED 中使用复杂干预措施对基线 CT 订购率较高的患者实施干预措施更有可能减少 mTBI 儿童的头部影像学检查。在干预策略中纳入 PECARN 决策规则可使中位数减少 27%的订单。进一步的研究可以深入了解哪些特定因素影响成功实施和持续效果。

相似文献

1
Interventions to Reduce Imaging in Children With Minor Traumatic Head Injury: A Systematic Review.减少儿童轻微创伤性头部损伤影像学检查的干预措施:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2024 Dec 1;154(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2024-066955.
2
PECARN prediction rules for CT imaging of children presenting to the emergency department with blunt abdominal or minor head trauma: a multicentre prospective validation study.PECARN 预测规则在急诊以钝性腹部或轻微头部创伤就诊的儿童 CT 成像中的应用:一项多中心前瞻性验证研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024 May;8(5):339-347. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00029-4.
3
Validation of the PECARN clinical decision rule for children with minor head trauma: a French multicenter prospective study.小儿轻度头部创伤的PECARN临床决策规则验证:一项法国多中心前瞻性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Aug 4;24:98. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0287-3.
4
Clinical Decision Rules for Paediatric Minor Head Injury: Are CT Scans a Necessary Evil?儿科小型头部损伤的临床决策规则:CT 扫描是否有必要?
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2015 Sep;44(9):335-41.
5
Serum S100β Neuroprotein Reduces Use of Cranial Computed Tomography in Children After Minor Head Trauma.血清S100β神经蛋白减少轻度头部创伤后儿童的头颅计算机断层扫描使用
Shock. 2015 Nov;44(5):410-6. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000442.
6
Cost-effectiveness of the PECARN rules in children with minor head trauma.小儿轻度头部创伤中PECAN规则的成本效益
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;65(1):72-80.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.08.019. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
7
Implementation of adapted PECARN decision rule for children with minor head injury in the pediatric emergency department.在儿科急诊实施改良版 PECARN 决策规则用于治疗轻微头部损伤患儿。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;19(7):801-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01384.x. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
8
Comparison of Prediction Rules and Clinician Suspicion for Identifying Children With Clinically Important Brain Injuries After Blunt Head Trauma.钝性头部创伤后识别具有临床重要性脑损伤儿童的预测规则与临床医生怀疑程度的比较
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 May;23(5):566-75. doi: 10.1111/acem.12923. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
9
Unnecessary Scans Lead to Unnecessary Re-scans: Evaluating Clinical Management of Low and Intermediate Risk Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injuries.不必要的扫描导致不必要的再次扫描:评估低风险和中等风险儿童创伤性脑损伤的临床管理
J Pediatr Surg. 2025 Feb;60(2):162097. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162097. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
10
PECARN prediction rule for cervical spine imaging of children presenting to the emergency department with blunt trauma: a multicentre prospective observational study.PECARN 预测规则在儿童因钝器伤就诊于急诊时的颈椎成像:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024 Jul;8(7):482-490. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00104-4. Epub 2024 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
An update on paediatric traumatic brain injury in the emergency department: a narrative review.急诊科小儿创伤性脑损伤的最新进展:叙述性综述
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Aug 2;184(8):523. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06345-9.
2
Digitalizing English-language CT Interpretation for Positive Haemorrhage Evaluation Reporting: the DECIPHER study.数字化英语CT解读用于阳性出血评估报告:DECIPHER研究
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Jul 25;32(1):e101433. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101433.