Liang Weishi, Sun Duan, Han Bo, Yang Yihan, Yin Peng, Hai Yong
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.
Joint Laboratory for Research & Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury in Spinal Deformity, Laboratory for Clinical Medicine Capital Medical University Beijing China.
JOR Spine. 2024 Oct 31;7(4):e70008. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.70008. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Hybrid surgery (HS) combined cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is emerging, but its biomechanical effects as a revision surgery (RS) on adjacent segments were unclear.
This finite element (FE) study aimed to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of HS to treat two-level discontinuous ASD in ACDF RS.
A C2-T1 intact FE model was established and modified to a primary C5/6 ACDF model and five RS models. These RS models' segments C4/5 and C6/7 were revised using cage plus plate (C), zero-profile devices (P), and Bryan disc (D), respectively, generating C-C-C, P-C-P, D-C-P, P-C-D, and D-C-D models. In the intact and C5/6 ACDF models, a 1.0 Nm moment was used to produce the range of motion (ROM). A displacement load was applied to all RS models, to achieve a total ROM match that of the primary C5/6 ACDF model.
In the P-C-P model, biomechanical responses including ROM, Intradiscal pressure (IDP), Facet joint force (FJF), and Maximum von Mises stresses of discs at segments C3/4 and C7/T1 were slightly lower than the C-C-C model. The biomechanical response parameters at segments C3/4 and C7/T1 of P-C-D, D-C-P, and D-C-D were smaller than those in C-C-C and P-C-P models. D-C-D had the most significant effect on reducing all biomechanical responses among all RS models in segments C3/4 and C7/T1. Moreover, the disc stress cloud maps showed that the maximum von Mises stress of the C3/4 disc was higher than that of C7/T1.
D-C-D, P-C-D, and D-C-P are good RS choices for reducing the biomechanical responses, and D-C-D was the best choice. P-C-P can be the best recommendation when it does not meet the CDA indications. This study provided a biomechanical reference for hybrid surgical decision-making in the ACDF RS for preventing ASD recurrence.
杂交手术(HS)将颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)相结合,这种手术正在兴起,但作为翻修手术(RS)对相邻节段的生物力学影响尚不清楚。
本有限元(FE)研究旨在探讨HS治疗ACDF翻修手术中两节段连续性椎体间失稳(ASD)的生物力学特征。
建立一个C2-T1完整有限元模型,并将其修改为一个原发性C5/6 ACDF模型和五个翻修手术模型。这些翻修手术模型的C4/5和C6/7节段分别采用椎间融合器加钢板(C)、零切迹椎间融合器(P)和Bryan人工椎间盘(D)进行翻修,生成C-C-C、P-C-P、D-C-P、P-C-D和D-C-D模型。在完整模型和C5/6 ACDF模型中,使用1.0 Nm的力矩来产生活动度(ROM)。对所有翻修手术模型施加位移载荷,以使总活动度与原发性C5/6 ACDF模型的总活动度相匹配。
在P-C-P模型中,包括C3/4和C7/T1节段的活动度、椎间盘内压力(IDP)、小关节力(FJF)以及椎间盘最大von Mises应力在内的生物力学响应略低于C-C-C模型。P-C-D、D-C-P和D-C-D模型C3/4和C7/T1节段的生物力学响应参数小于C-C-C和P-C-P模型。在所有翻修手术模型中,D-C-D对降低C3/4和C7/T1节段所有生物力学响应的影响最为显著。此外,椎间盘应力云图显示,C3/4椎间盘的最大von Mises应力高于C7/T1椎间盘。
D-C-D、P-C-D和D-C-P是降低生物力学响应的良好翻修手术选择,其中D-C-D是最佳选择。当不符合CDA适应证时,P-C-P可能是最佳推荐。本研究为ACDF翻修手术中杂交手术决策提供了生物力学参考,以预防ASD复发。