Craig Erin M, Oprea Francesca, Alam Sajid, Grodsky Ania, Miller Kyle E
Central Washington University, Department of Physics, Ellensburg, WA, United States.
Department of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 Oct 17;12:1491429. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1491429. eCollection 2024.
While the structural organization and molecular biology of neurons are well characterized, the physical process of axonal elongation remains elusive. The classic view posited elongation occurs through the deposition of cytoskeletal elements in the growth cone at the tip of a stationary array of microtubules. Yet, recent studies reveal axonal microtubules and docked organelles flow forward in bulk in the elongating axons of , chick sensory, rat hippocampal, and neurons. Noting that the morphology, molecular components, and subcellular flow patterns of growth cones strongly resemble the leading edge of migrating cells and the polar regions of dividing cells, our working hypothesis is that axonal elongation utilizes the same physical mechanisms that drive cell crawling and cell division. As a test of that hypothesis, here we take experimental data sets of sub-cellular flow patterns in cells undergoing cytokinesis, mesenchymal migration, amoeboid migration, neuronal migration, and axonal elongation. We then apply active fluid theory to develop a biophysical model that describes the different sub-cellular flow profiles across these forms of motility and how this generates cell motility under low Reynolds numbers. The modeling suggests that mechanisms for generating motion are shared across these processes, and differences arise through modifications of sub-cellular adhesion patterns and the profiles of internal force generation. Collectively, this work suggests that ameboid and mesenchymal cell crawling may have arisen from processes that first developed to support cell division, that growth cone motility and cell crawling are closely related, and that neuronal migration and axonal elongation are fundamentally similar, differing primarily in the motion and strength of adhesion under the cell body.
虽然神经元的结构组织和分子生物学已得到充分表征,但轴突伸长的物理过程仍然难以捉摸。传统观点认为,伸长是通过在固定的微管阵列末端的生长锥中沉积细胞骨架成分来实现的。然而,最近的研究表明,在鸡感觉神经元、大鼠海马神经元和其他神经元的伸长轴突中,轴突微管和停靠的细胞器整体向前流动。注意到生长锥的形态、分子成分和亚细胞流动模式与迁移细胞的前缘和分裂细胞的极性区域非常相似,我们的工作假设是轴突伸长利用了驱动细胞爬行和细胞分裂的相同物理机制。作为对该假设的检验,我们收集了经历胞质分裂、间充质迁移、阿米巴样迁移、神经元迁移和轴突伸长的细胞中亚细胞流动模式的实验数据集。然后,我们应用活性流体理论建立了一个生物物理模型,该模型描述了这些运动形式中不同的亚细胞流动轮廓,以及这如何在低雷诺数下产生细胞运动。该模型表明,这些过程中产生运动的机制是共享的,差异是通过亚细胞粘附模式的改变和内力产生的轮廓而产生的。总的来说,这项工作表明,阿米巴样和间充质细胞爬行可能源于最初为支持细胞分裂而发展的过程,生长锥运动和细胞爬行密切相关,神经元迁移和轴突伸长在根本上是相似的,主要区别在于细胞体下方的运动和粘附强度。