Erasmus Medical Center (MC) Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center (MC), Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Erasmus Medical Center (MC) Transplant Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center (MC), Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Transpl Int. 2024 Oct 17;37:11872. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.11872. eCollection 2024.
Access to solid organ transplantation in patients with intellectual disability is associated with health inequities due to concerns about treatment adherence, survival rates, and post-transplant quality of life. This systematic literature review aims to compare outcomes after organ transplantation in patients with intellectual disability compared to patients without intellectual disability. Embase, Medline Ovid, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Trials, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched for studies concerning pediatric or adult solid organ transplantation in recipients with a diagnosis of intellectual disability prior to transplantation. Primary outcomes were patient and graft survival rates. Secondary outcomes were acute rejection rate, adherence rates, and quality of life. Nine studies were included, describing kidney (n = 6), heart (n = 4) and liver (n = 1) transplantation. Reported graft survival rates were non-inferior or better compared to patients without intellectual disability, while patient survival was reportedly slightly lower in two studies reporting on kidney transplantation. Although current evidence has a potential selection bias based on including patients with a sufficient support network, intellectual disability alone should not be regarded a relative or absolute contra-indication for solid organ transplantation.
智力残疾患者接受实体器官移植与健康不平等有关,这是由于对治疗依从性、生存率和移植后生活质量的担忧。本系统文献综述旨在比较智力残疾患者与无智力残疾患者接受器官移植后的结局。通过 Embase、Medline Ovid、PsycINFO、Web of Science、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库和 Google Scholar 数据库,系统地检索了在移植前诊断为智力残疾的受者中进行儿科或成人实体器官移植的研究。主要结局是患者和移植物的生存率。次要结局是急性排斥反应率、依从率和生活质量。共纳入 9 项研究,描述了肾(n=6)、心(n=4)和肝(n=1)移植。报道的移植物生存率与无智力残疾患者相比不劣或更好,而在两项关于肾移植的研究中报道的患者生存率略低。尽管目前的证据基于纳入有足够支持网络的患者存在潜在选择偏倚,但智力残疾本身不应被视为实体器官移植的相对或绝对禁忌症。