Ravendran Kapilraj, Elmoraly Ahmed, Thomas Christo S, Job Mridhu L, Vahab Afrah A, Khanom Shafali, Kam Chloe
Surgery, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brighton and Hove, GBR.
Doctor, Gradscape, London, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):e72769. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72769. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Symptoms of gallstone disease are the most common reason for cholecystectomy. Fenestration reduces the likelihood of severe inflammation or scarring after normal treatments are used, and it also enhances control over bile outflow. The goal of reconstituted cholecystectomy is to lessen symptoms like pain and jaundice without undergoing the high-risk procedures associated with more invasive procedures. The reconstituted and fenestrated procedures were assessed by a meta-analysis and systematic review. Of the five studies, 189 (34.2%) had a reconstituted subtotal cholecystectomy, and 363 (65.8%) had a fenestrated subtotal cholecystectomy, which had populations from the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Turkey. Two individuals from three trials had bile duct injury, according to three studies. Whereas the fenestrated group reported no bile injury from 236 individuals (0%), the reconstituted group reported two bile duct injuries from 100 patients (2%). The incidence was found to be lower in the fenestrated group (OR 10.81; CI 95% 1.03-113.65; p = 0.39; I2 = 0%) than in the reconstituted group. Four studies revealed 92 cases of bile leaks: 19 out of 155 cases (12.3%) were reconstituted, and 73 out of 351 cases (20.8%) were fenestrated. Between the two groups, there was a significant difference in bile leakage (OR 0.72; CI 95% 0.23-2.32; p = 0.03; I2 = 66%). Two studies reported the establishment of fistulas following surgery in 58 patients in the reconstituted group (5.2%) and 120 patients in the fenestrated group (2.5%) (p = 0.56, I2 = 0%, and OR 0.65; CI 95% 0.12-3.38); however, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Following a fenestrated partial cholecystectomy, postoperative bile leakage, fistula development, wound infection, and retained stones are more prevalent. Additionally, we saw that the fenestrated method was being used more frequently for post-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The subtotal cholecystectomy technique used should be chosen according to the surgeon's comfort level and experience with the various techniques and intraoperative findings, even if the reconstituted procedure could be preferred when feasible. To completely understand the role of each method in the general surgeon's toolkit for treating complex gallbladder (GB) patients, longer-term follow-up studies are still necessary.
胆结石疾病的症状是胆囊切除术最常见的原因。开窗术可降低常规治疗后发生严重炎症或瘢痕形成的可能性,还能增强对胆汁流出的控制。改良胆囊切除术的目的是减轻疼痛和黄疸等症状,而无需进行与更具侵入性手术相关的高风险操作。通过荟萃分析和系统评价对改良和开窗手术进行了评估。在五项研究中,189例(34.2%)进行了改良次全胆囊切除术,363例(65.8%)进行了开窗次全胆囊切除术,这些研究的人群来自美国、英国、日本和土耳其。三项研究显示,三项试验中的两名患者发生了胆管损伤。开窗组236例患者(0%)未报告胆汁损伤,而改良组100例患者中有两例发生胆管损伤(2%)。发现开窗组的发生率低于改良组(比值比10.81;95%置信区间1.03 - 113.65;p = 0.39;I² = 0%)。四项研究共报告了92例胆漏:155例中的19例(12.3%)为改良手术,351例中的73例(20.8%)为开窗手术。两组之间胆漏存在显著差异(比值比0.72;95%置信区间0.23 - 2.32;p = 0.03;I² = 66%)。两项研究报告了手术后瘘管形成情况,改良组58例患者(5.2%)出现瘘管,开窗组120例患者(2.5%)出现瘘管(p = 0.56,I² = 0%,比值比0.65;95%置信区间0.12 - 3.38);然而,两组之间无统计学显著差异。开窗部分胆囊切除术后,术后胆漏、瘘管形成、伤口感染和结石残留更为常见。此外,我们发现开窗法在术后内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)中使用得更为频繁。即使在可行的情况下改良手术可能更受青睐,但应根据外科医生对各种技术的熟练程度和经验以及术中发现来选择所采用的次全胆囊切除术技术。为了全面了解每种方法在普通外科医生治疗复杂胆囊(GB)患者的工具包中的作用,仍需要进行长期随访研究。