Andargeery Shaherah Yousef, Almalki Abdullah Ahmed, Aljohani Nada, Alyami Hanan, Alhagbani Abdulrhman
Nursing Management and Education Department, College of Nursing, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdulaziz General Hospital, Makkah Healthcare Cluster, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Oct 27;18:2169-2185. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S485369. eCollection 2024.
Many patients experience stress and dissatisfaction when they are admitted to acute settings, where they receive short-term and active care for severe injuries, illnesses, or surgeries. Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of healthcare quality that affects patient outcomes, service delivery, and safety.
This review aimed at systematically mapping and summarizing the evidence on non-pharmacological interventions that targeted patient satisfaction in inpatient acute settings.
Three electronic databases were searched, including PubMed, EBSCO, and ScienceDirect. The inclusion criteria were: (1) studies of non-pharmacological interventions to improve patients' satisfaction and targeting inpatients between the ages of 19 and 65 years old; (2) studies written in English and published in the last 10 years, starting from 2017. The search results were imported and screened for eligibility on Covidence. The data was then extracted, using a tool entered in Covidence's Extraction 2.0. The extraction tool included domains on both intervention impact and delivery processes.
A total of 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. Randomized control trials represented the most among the group; seven studies were included given that the others were quasi-experimental studies. Those studies were conducted on the different types of services offered in acute care departments. These studies did not use a standardized questionnaire to evaluate their respective trial outcomes or to implement various adapted or adopted modules of intervention. Of note, the intervention was effective in enhancing patient satisfaction in only some of the studies.
Different types of intervention modules have been effective in improving acute care patient satisfaction. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention among all patients in different acute care departments at the same time.
许多患者在入住急症科室时会感到压力和不满,在这些科室中,他们会因重伤、重病或手术接受短期的积极治疗。患者满意度是医疗质量的关键指标,会影响患者的治疗效果、服务提供和安全。
本综述旨在系统梳理和总结针对住院急症科室患者满意度的非药物干预措施的证据。
检索了三个电子数据库,包括PubMed、EBSCO和ScienceDirect。纳入标准为:(1)关于改善患者满意度且针对19至65岁住院患者的非药物干预措施的研究;(2)2017年起过去10年内发表的英文研究。检索结果导入Covidence进行资格筛选。然后使用Covidence提取2.0中输入的工具提取数据。提取工具包括干预影响和实施过程方面的领域。
共有11篇文章符合纳入标准。随机对照试验在该组中占比最大;鉴于其他为半实验性研究,纳入了7项研究。这些研究针对急症科室提供的不同类型服务开展。这些研究未使用标准化问卷来评估各自的试验结果或实施各种改编或采用的干预模块。值得注意的是,只有部分研究中的干预措施能有效提高患者满意度。
不同类型的干预模块在提高急症护理患者满意度方面有效。然而,需要进一步研究以同时评估干预措施在不同急症科室所有患者中的有效性。