Suppr超能文献

椭圆形切除并一期缝合鼻缺损以获得最佳美学效果:50例病例系列

Elliptical excision and primary closure of nasal defect to achieve best esthetic outcome: A case series of 50 patients.

作者信息

Bhingradia Yogesh M, Yadav Chinmai, Salunke Tejaswini Sopanrao

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Shivani Skin Care and Cosmetic Clinic, Surat, Gujarat, India.

Department of Dermatology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2024 Jul-Sep;17(3):234-238. doi: 10.25259/jcas_120_23. Epub 2024 Aug 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cosmetic result of nasal of an elliptical excision and primary closure on small nasal defect by using Scar assessment using the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) score.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective interventional study was conducted in a private clinic over a 2-year duration. Patients aged 18-60 years with nasal defects <1.5 cm were enrolled after obtaining informed consent. Exclusion criteria included immunocompromised status, keloidal tendency, local site infection, bleeding disorder, age <18 years, and lack of consent. Scar assessment using the SBSES was performed at the end of 6 months. Statistical analysis included summary statistics, analysis of variance tests, and a significance level of < 0.05.

RESULTS

The study included 50 patients, with 54% males and 46% females. The most common age group was 21-40 years, and melanocytic nevi was the most common cause for excision. Lesions were excised mainly from the lateral wall and dorsum of the nose. The mean SBSES score was 3.79 ± 0.467. The best cosmetic outcome was observed in lesions involving the dorsum followed by the root of the nose. No significant difference was found among the SBSES scores for various subunits.

CONCLUSION

Elliptical excision with primary closure is a simple and effective technique for small nasal defects, providing good cosmetic results. The location of the nasal defect influences the cosmetic outcome, with better results observed in areas with thinner skin and increased skin laxity.

摘要

目的

使用石溪瘢痕评估量表(SBSES)评分进行瘢痕评估,以评价椭圆形切除联合一期缝合治疗小面积鼻缺损的美容效果。

材料与方法

本回顾性干预性研究在一家私人诊所进行,为期2年。纳入年龄在18 - 60岁、鼻缺损小于1.5 cm且签署知情同意书的患者。排除标准包括免疫功能低下状态、瘢痕疙瘩倾向、局部感染、出血性疾病、年龄小于18岁以及未签署同意书。在6个月末使用SBSES进行瘢痕评估。统计分析包括描述性统计、方差分析测试,显著性水平设定为<0.05。

结果

该研究纳入50例患者,其中男性占54%,女性占46%。最常见的年龄组为21 - 40岁,黑素细胞痣是最常见的切除原因。病变主要从鼻侧壁和鼻背切除。SBSES平均评分为3.79 ± 0.467。在涉及鼻背的病变中观察到最佳美容效果,其次是鼻根部。各亚单位的SBSES评分之间未发现显著差异。

结论

椭圆形切除联合一期缝合是治疗小面积鼻缺损的一种简单有效的技术,可提供良好的美容效果。鼻缺损的位置影响美容效果,在皮肤较薄且皮肤松弛度增加的区域效果更佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3662/11497555/581f64613ca4/JCAS-17-234-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验