Esposito Daniel V, Lee Youngmin, Yoon Heayoung, Haney Paul, Labrador Natalie, Moffat Thomas P, Talin A Alec, Szalai Veronika
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology, Materials Measurement Laboratory, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
Columbia University in the City of New York, Department of Chemical Engineering, Lenfest Center for Sustainable Energy, 500 W. 120 St., New York, NY 10027.
Sustain Energy Fuels. 2017;1(1). doi: 10.1039/c6se00073h.
Three-dimensionally (3D) structured photoelectrodes offer a number of potential benefits for solar fuels production compared to conventional planar photoelectrodes, including decreased optical losses, higher surface area for catalysis, easier removal of product species, and enhanced carrier collection efficiency. However, 3D structures can also present challenges, such as lower photovoltage and larger surface recombination. Quantifying and understanding the advantages and disadvantages of 3D structuring can maximize benefits, but this goal is not trivial because the factors that affect photoelectrode performance are intertwined. In this article, we provide an overview of the benefits and challenges of using 3D photoelectrode structures and present a systematic approach for deconvoluting the most common effects of 3D structure on photoelectrode performance. As a basis for this study, metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) photoelectrodes consisting of p-Si micro-pillar arrays with well-defined diameter, pitch, and height were fabricated by reactive ion etching (RIE). A general framework for modeling the influences of 3D structure on photoelectrode current-potential performance is presented, and a comparison of the loss mechanisms in 3D and planar photoelectrodes is illustrated using loss analysis diagrams. We expect that most of the measurements and analyses that we demonstrate for MIS photoelectrodes can be applied with equal success to liquid-junction and p-n junction 3D structured photoelectrodes.
与传统的平面光电极相比,三维(3D)结构化光电极在太阳能燃料生产方面具有许多潜在优势,包括减少光学损失、增加催化表面积、更易于去除产物物种以及提高载流子收集效率。然而,3D结构也可能带来挑战,例如较低的光电压和较大的表面复合。量化和理解3D结构的优缺点可以使优势最大化,但这一目标并不容易实现,因为影响光电极性能的因素相互交织。在本文中,我们概述了使用3D光电极结构的优势和挑战,并提出了一种系统方法,用于剖析3D结构对光电极性能最常见的影响。作为本研究的基础,通过反应离子蚀刻(RIE)制备了由具有明确直径、间距和高度的p型硅微柱阵列组成的金属-绝缘体-半导体(MIS)光电极。提出了一个用于模拟3D结构对光电极电流-电势性能影响的通用框架,并使用损失分析图说明了3D和平面光电极中损失机制的比较。我们预计,我们针对MIS光电极展示的大多数测量和分析方法,同样可以成功应用于液结和p-n结3D结构化光电极。