Suppr超能文献

华盛顿小组问题在测量失明和失聪方面的表现。

Performance of the Washington Group questions in measuring blindness and deafness.

作者信息

Landes Scott D, Swenor Bonnielin K, Hall Jean P

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Aging Studies Institute, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, United States.

Disability Health Research Center, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.

出版信息

Health Aff Sch. 2024 Oct 15;2(11):qxae131. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae131. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Abstract

The Washington Group Short Set (WGSS) questions are intended to measure the severity of disability and disability status in US federal surveys. We used data from the 2010-2018 National Health Interview Survey to examine the performance of the WGSS visual disability and hearing disability questions in capturing blindness and deafness. We found that the WGSS questions failed to capture 35.7% of blind adults and 43.7% of deaf respondents as having a severe disability, or, per their recommended cut point, as being disabled. Coupled with evidence demonstrating the poor performance of the WGSS questions in estimating the size of the overall disability population, we contend that results from this study necessitate a halt in the use of the WGSS questions to measure disability in US federal surveys.

摘要

华盛顿小组简表(WGSS)问题旨在在美国联邦调查中衡量残疾的严重程度和残疾状况。我们使用了2010 - 2018年全国健康访谈调查的数据,来检验WGSS视觉残疾和听力残疾问题在识别失明和失聪方面的表现。我们发现,按照其推荐的切点,WGSS问题未能将35.7%的成年盲人以及43.7%的失聪受访者识别为有严重残疾或残疾。再加上有证据表明WGSS问题在估计总体残疾人口规模方面表现不佳,我们认为本研究结果有必要停止在美国联邦调查中使用WGSS问题来衡量残疾情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35bf/11523053/af2b98104832/qxae131f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验