• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸腔引流管直径对胸腔积液患者引流率及导管性能影响的比较。一项横断面研究。

Comparison of the effect of chest tube diameter on drainage rate and tube performance in patients with pleural effusion. A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Gholami Ehsan, Sharifzadeh Gholamreza, Vahedi Matin, Samimiat Alireza, Eslamian Reza, Ebrahimpour Hossein

机构信息

Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.

出版信息

Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2024 Sep;21(3):162-166. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2024.143489. Epub 2024 Sep 25.

DOI:10.5114/kitp.2024.143489
PMID:39484110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11523486/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chest tube insertion is one of the essential procedures that is performed for patients suffering from pneumothorax or pleural effusion. Choosing the best chest tube size, with maximum emptying and minimum discomfort and side effects, is one of the most important factors in patient care, while the best tube size is highly a matter of debate. In this investigation, we aimed to assess the difference between the groups with different chest tube sizes regarding the time needed for drainage, the necessity of additional invasive procedures, or pain severity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, patients with pleural effusion, were entered into the study. patients were randomly divided into two groups based on their chest tube size: size 28 and size 32. Then, the duration of complete effusion emptying and the duration of the chest tube insertion was evaluated.

RESULTS

According to this study, 26 (65.0%) participants were male. The duration for complete evacuation of pleural effusion varied from 3 to 10 days. The average duration of chest tube retention in the group of patients with chest tube sized 28 and 32 were 5.82, and 5.91 days, respectively; The average pain intensity in the group of patients with chest tube sized 28 and 32 were 6.71 ±1.02 and 6.48 ±1.21 units, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in how long the chest tube needed to stay in place to fully drain the pleural effusion. They also didn't differ significantly in the need for additional invasive procedures such as VATS, and secondary chest tube insertion. There was no notable difference for pain severity and the need for painkillers in the two groups of patients.

摘要

引言

胸腔闭式引流管置入术是气胸或胸腔积液患者的基本治疗手段之一。选择最佳的胸腔闭式引流管尺寸,以实现最大程度的引流、最小的不适和副作用,是患者护理中最重要的因素之一,而最佳的引流管尺寸一直存在很大争议。在本研究中,我们旨在评估不同尺寸胸腔闭式引流管在引流所需时间、额外侵入性操作的必要性或疼痛严重程度方面的差异。

材料与方法

在这项横断面研究中,纳入了胸腔积液患者。根据胸腔闭式引流管尺寸将患者随机分为两组:28号和32号。然后,评估胸腔积液完全排空的持续时间和胸腔闭式引流管置入的持续时间。

结果

根据本研究,26名(65.0%)参与者为男性。胸腔积液完全排空的持续时间为3至10天。胸腔闭式引流管尺寸为28号和32号的患者组中,胸腔闭式引流管留置的平均持续时间分别为5.82天和5.91天;胸腔闭式引流管尺寸为28号和32号的患者组中,平均疼痛强度分别为6.71±1.02和6.48±1.21单位。

结论

胸腔闭式引流管为完全引流胸腔积液所需留置的时间没有显著差异。在是否需要额外的侵入性操作(如电视辅助胸腔镜手术和二次胸腔闭式引流管置入)方面也没有显著差异。两组患者在疼痛严重程度和使用止痛药的必要性方面没有显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the effect of chest tube diameter on drainage rate and tube performance in patients with pleural effusion. A cross-sectional study.胸腔引流管直径对胸腔积液患者引流率及导管性能影响的比较。一项横断面研究。
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2024 Sep;21(3):162-166. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2024.143489. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
Limitation of tube thoracostomy in treating pneumothorax in COVID-19 infected patients. A retrospective cohort study.胸腔闭式引流术治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎感染患者气胸的局限性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Aug;80:104171. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104171. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
3
Early chest tube removal after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy with serous fluid production up to 500 ml/day.电视辅助胸腔镜手术肺叶切除术后,若每日浆液生成量达500毫升,可早期拔除胸腔引流管。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Feb;45(2):241-6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt376. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
4
Does size matter? A prospective analysis of 28-32 versus 36-40 French chest tube size in trauma.大小重要吗?一项前瞻性分析 28-32 号与 36-40 号法国胸腔引流管大小在创伤中的应用。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Feb;72(2):422-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182452444.
5
Comparative analysis of chest tube thoracostomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in empyema and parapneumonic effusion associated with pneumonia in children.小儿脓胸及肺炎旁胸腔积液行胸腔闭式引流术与电视辅助胸腔镜手术的对比分析
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008 Jun;9(3):317-23. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.025.
6
Videothoracoscopic surgery before and after chest tube drainage for children with complicated parapneumonic effusion.胸腔镜手术在儿童复杂性脓胸胸腔引流前后的应用。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2018 Mar-Apr;94(2):140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
7
Thoracoscopy and talc poudrage compared with intercostal drainage and talc slurry infusion to manage malignant pleural effusion: the TAPPS RCT.胸腔镜和滑石粉喷洒与肋间引流和滑石粉混悬液灌注治疗恶性胸腔积液的比较:TAPPS RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(26):1-90. doi: 10.3310/hta24260.
8
Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery the best treatment for paediatric pleural empyema?电视辅助胸腔镜手术是小儿胸腔积液的最佳治疗方法吗?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Jul;13(1):70-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.254698. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
9
Reintervention Rate After Pigtail Catheter Insertion Compared to Surgical Chest Tubes.经皮穿刺引流(猪尾巴导管)与外科胸腔引流管的再次介入率比较。
Am Surg. 2023 Dec;89(12):5487-5491. doi: 10.1177/00031348231157419. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
10
Surgical versus non-surgical management for pleural empyema.胸腔积脓的手术治疗与非手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 17;3(3):CD010651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010651.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing complications of small-bore chest tubes to large-bore chest tubes in the setting of delayed hemothorax: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.比较延迟性血胸中小口径胸腔引流管与大口径胸腔引流管并发症:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 22;28(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00754-5.
2
Chest Tube Drainage of the Pleural Space: A Concise Review for Pulmonologists.胸腔闭式引流:给肺科医生的简要综述
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2018 Apr;81(2):106-115. doi: 10.4046/trd.2017.0107. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
3
A Prospective Study of 7-Year Experience Using Percutaneous 14-French Pigtail Catheters for Traumatic Hemothorax/Hemopneumothorax at a Level-1 Trauma Center: Size Still Does Not Matter.在一级创伤中心使用经皮14法式猪尾导管治疗创伤性血胸/血气胸的7年经验前瞻性研究:尺寸并非关键因素
World J Surg. 2018 Jan;42(1):107-113. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4168-3.
4
Small tube thoracostomy (20-22 Fr) in emergent management of chest trauma.小口径胸腔闭式引流术(20-22F)在胸部创伤急诊处理中的应用
Injury. 2017 Sep;48(9):1884-1887. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
5
Management of Persistent Air Leaks.持续性气胸的处理
Chest. 2017 Aug;152(2):417-423. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.02.020. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
6
Optimizing postoperative care protocols in thoracic surgery: best evidence and new technology.优化胸外科术后护理方案:最佳证据与新技术
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Feb;8(Suppl 1):S3-S11. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.10.67.
7
Randomized clinical trial of pigtail catheter versus chest tube in injured patients with uncomplicated traumatic pneumothorax.随机对照临床试验:猪尾导管与胸腔引流管在单纯性创伤性气胸患者中的应用比较。
Br J Surg. 2014 Jan;101(2):17-22. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9377.
8
14 French pigtail catheters placed by surgeons to drain blood on trauma patients: is 14-Fr too small?14 根法国猪尾导管由外科医生放置在创伤患者身上以引流血液:14Fr 是否太小?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1423-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318271c1c7.
9
The impact of chest tube removal on pain and pulmonary function after pulmonary resection.胸腔引流管移除对肺切除术后疼痛和肺功能的影响。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Apr;41(4):820-2; discussion 823. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr126. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
10
Pleural controversy: optimal chest tube size for drainage.胸腔争议:引流的最佳胸腔引流管尺寸。
Respirology. 2011 Feb;16(2):244-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01913.x.