Suppr超能文献

胸腔引流管直径对胸腔积液患者引流率及导管性能影响的比较。一项横断面研究。

Comparison of the effect of chest tube diameter on drainage rate and tube performance in patients with pleural effusion. A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Gholami Ehsan, Sharifzadeh Gholamreza, Vahedi Matin, Samimiat Alireza, Eslamian Reza, Ebrahimpour Hossein

机构信息

Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.

出版信息

Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2024 Sep;21(3):162-166. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2024.143489. Epub 2024 Sep 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chest tube insertion is one of the essential procedures that is performed for patients suffering from pneumothorax or pleural effusion. Choosing the best chest tube size, with maximum emptying and minimum discomfort and side effects, is one of the most important factors in patient care, while the best tube size is highly a matter of debate. In this investigation, we aimed to assess the difference between the groups with different chest tube sizes regarding the time needed for drainage, the necessity of additional invasive procedures, or pain severity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, patients with pleural effusion, were entered into the study. patients were randomly divided into two groups based on their chest tube size: size 28 and size 32. Then, the duration of complete effusion emptying and the duration of the chest tube insertion was evaluated.

RESULTS

According to this study, 26 (65.0%) participants were male. The duration for complete evacuation of pleural effusion varied from 3 to 10 days. The average duration of chest tube retention in the group of patients with chest tube sized 28 and 32 were 5.82, and 5.91 days, respectively; The average pain intensity in the group of patients with chest tube sized 28 and 32 were 6.71 ±1.02 and 6.48 ±1.21 units, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in how long the chest tube needed to stay in place to fully drain the pleural effusion. They also didn't differ significantly in the need for additional invasive procedures such as VATS, and secondary chest tube insertion. There was no notable difference for pain severity and the need for painkillers in the two groups of patients.

摘要

引言

胸腔闭式引流管置入术是气胸或胸腔积液患者的基本治疗手段之一。选择最佳的胸腔闭式引流管尺寸,以实现最大程度的引流、最小的不适和副作用,是患者护理中最重要的因素之一,而最佳的引流管尺寸一直存在很大争议。在本研究中,我们旨在评估不同尺寸胸腔闭式引流管在引流所需时间、额外侵入性操作的必要性或疼痛严重程度方面的差异。

材料与方法

在这项横断面研究中,纳入了胸腔积液患者。根据胸腔闭式引流管尺寸将患者随机分为两组:28号和32号。然后,评估胸腔积液完全排空的持续时间和胸腔闭式引流管置入的持续时间。

结果

根据本研究,26名(65.0%)参与者为男性。胸腔积液完全排空的持续时间为3至10天。胸腔闭式引流管尺寸为28号和32号的患者组中,胸腔闭式引流管留置的平均持续时间分别为5.82天和5.91天;胸腔闭式引流管尺寸为28号和32号的患者组中,平均疼痛强度分别为6.71±1.02和6.48±1.21单位。

结论

胸腔闭式引流管为完全引流胸腔积液所需留置的时间没有显著差异。在是否需要额外的侵入性操作(如电视辅助胸腔镜手术和二次胸腔闭式引流管置入)方面也没有显著差异。两组患者在疼痛严重程度和使用止痛药的必要性方面没有显著差异。

相似文献

10
Surgical versus non-surgical management for pleural empyema.胸腔积脓的手术治疗与非手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 17;3(3):CD010651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010651.pub2.

本文引用的文献

2
Chest Tube Drainage of the Pleural Space: A Concise Review for Pulmonologists.胸腔闭式引流:给肺科医生的简要综述
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2018 Apr;81(2):106-115. doi: 10.4046/trd.2017.0107. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
5
Management of Persistent Air Leaks.持续性气胸的处理
Chest. 2017 Aug;152(2):417-423. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.02.020. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
9
The impact of chest tube removal on pain and pulmonary function after pulmonary resection.胸腔引流管移除对肺切除术后疼痛和肺功能的影响。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Apr;41(4):820-2; discussion 823. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr126. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验