• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教学信念对高等教育中生成式人工智能采用的影响:基于UTAUT2的预测模型

The impact of pedagogical beliefs on the adoption of generative AI in higher education: predictive model from UTAUT2.

作者信息

Cabero-Almenara Julio, Palacios-Rodríguez Antonio, Loaiza-Aguirre María Isabel, Andrade-Abarca Paola Salomé

机构信息

Department of Didactics and Educational Organisation, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

Department of Economics and Business Sciences, Private Technical University of Loja, Loja, Ecuador.

出版信息

Front Artif Intell. 2024 Oct 17;7:1497705. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1497705. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/frai.2024.1497705
PMID:39484153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11524896/
Abstract

Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) offers advanced tools that can personalize learning experiences and enhance teachers' research capabilities. This paper explores the beliefs of 425 university teachers regarding the integration of generative AI in educational settings, utilizing the UTAUT2 model to predict their acceptance and usage patterns through the Partial Least Squares (PLS) method. The findings indicate that performance expectations, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and hedonic motivation all positively impact the intention and behavior related to the use of AIEd. Notably, the study reveals that teachers with constructivist pedagogical beliefs are more inclined to adopt AIEd, underscoring the significance of considering teachers' attitudes and motivations for the effective integration of technology in education. This research provides valuable insights into the factors influencing teachers' decisions to embrace AIEd, thereby contributing to a deeper understanding of technology integration in educational contexts. Moreover, the study's results emphasize the critical role of teachers' pedagogical orientations in their acceptance and utilization of AI technologies. Constructivist educators, who emphasize student-centered learning and active engagement, are shown to be more receptive to incorporating AIEd tools compared to their transmissive counterparts, who focus on direct instruction and information dissemination. This distinction highlights the need for tailored professional development programs that address the specific beliefs and needs of different teaching philosophies. Furthermore, the study's comprehensive approach, considering various dimensions of the UTAUT2 model, offers a robust framework for analyzing technology acceptance in education.

摘要

教育中的人工智能(AIEd)提供了先进的工具,可以使学习体验个性化并增强教师的研究能力。本文探讨了425名大学教师对生成式人工智能在教育环境中整合的看法,利用UTAUT2模型通过偏最小二乘法(PLS)预测他们的接受度和使用模式。研究结果表明,绩效期望、努力期望、社会影响、促进条件和享乐动机都对与使用AIEd相关的意图和行为产生积极影响。值得注意的是,该研究表明,具有建构主义教学信念的教师更倾向于采用AIEd,这突出了考虑教师态度和动机对于在教育中有效整合技术的重要性。这项研究为影响教师接受AIEd的因素提供了有价值的见解,从而有助于更深入地理解教育背景下的技术整合。此外,该研究的结果强调了教师教学取向在其接受和使用人工智能技术方面的关键作用。与注重直接教学和信息传播的传统教育者相比,强调以学生为中心的学习和积极参与的建构主义教育者被证明更愿意采用AIEd工具。这种差异凸显了需要制定量身定制的专业发展计划,以满足不同教学理念的特定信念和需求。此外,该研究的综合方法考虑了UTAUT2模型的各个维度,为分析教育中的技术接受度提供了一个强大的框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f2/11524896/4b1cac127f7c/frai-07-1497705-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f2/11524896/9558fcb40b39/frai-07-1497705-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f2/11524896/56e3228111ab/frai-07-1497705-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f2/11524896/4b1cac127f7c/frai-07-1497705-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f2/11524896/9558fcb40b39/frai-07-1497705-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f2/11524896/56e3228111ab/frai-07-1497705-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f2/11524896/4b1cac127f7c/frai-07-1497705-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of pedagogical beliefs on the adoption of generative AI in higher education: predictive model from UTAUT2.教学信念对高等教育中生成式人工智能采用的影响:基于UTAUT2的预测模型
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Oct 17;7:1497705. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1497705. eCollection 2024.
2
Factors That Affect the Acceptance of Educational AI Tools by Greek Teachers-A Structural Equation Modelling Study.影响希腊教师对教育人工智能工具接受度的因素——一项结构方程建模研究
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Sep 21;14(9):2560-2579. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14090169.
3
Factors influencing pre-service special education teachers' intention toward AI in education: Digital literacy, teacher self-efficacy, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness.影响职前特殊教育教师对教育中人工智能意向的因素:数字素养、教师自我效能感、感知易用性和感知有用性。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 18;10(14):e34894. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34894. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
4
Pre-Service Teachers' GenAI Anxiety, Technology Self-Efficacy, and TPACK: Their Structural Relations with Behavioral Intention to Design GenAI-Assisted Teaching.职前教师的生成式人工智能焦虑、技术自我效能感与技术教学法内容知识:它们与设计生成式人工智能辅助教学行为意图的结构关系。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Apr 29;14(5):373. doi: 10.3390/bs14050373.
5
Anatomy in the metaverse: Exploring student technology acceptance through the UTAUT2 model.元宇宙中的解剖学:通过UTAUT2模型探索学生对技术的接受度
Anat Sci Educ. 2024 Mar;17(2):319-336. doi: 10.1002/ase.2353. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
6
Factors influencing college teachers' adoption of live online teaching: a conditional process model of technology acceptance, user satisfaction and privacy concerns.影响高校教师采用在线直播教学的因素:技术接受、用户满意度和隐私担忧的条件过程模型
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 10;14:1293879. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1293879. eCollection 2023.
7
Applying the UTAUT2 framework to patients' attitudes toward healthcare task shifting with artificial intelligence.将 UTAUT2 框架应用于患者对人工智能辅助医疗任务转移的态度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 11;24(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10861-z.
8
The relationship between technological pedagogical content knowledge and belief among preservice mathematics teachers.职前数学教师的技术教学内容知识与信念之间的关系。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Sep;249:104432. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104432. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
9
The effects of a gamified online course on pre-service teachers' confidence, intention, and motivation in integrating technology into teaching.一门游戏化在线课程对职前教师将技术融入教学的信心、意愿和动机的影响。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023 Mar 18:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11727-3.
10
Enhancing emotional health and engagement in Chinese English language learners: an approach from teachers' autonomy- supportive behavior, teachers' harmony, and peer support in a two-sample study.提高中国英语学习者的情绪健康与参与度:一项两样本研究中来自教师自主支持行为、教师和谐及同伴支持的方法
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 18;15:1356213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1356213. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the relationship between AI literacy, AI trust, AI dependency, and 21st century skills in preservice mathematics teachers.探索职前数学教师的人工智能素养、人工智能信任、人工智能依赖与21世纪技能之间的关系。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 24;15(1):14281. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99127-0.
2
University teachers' beliefs about the use of generative artificial intelligence for teaching and learning.大学教师对生成式人工智能在教学中的使用的看法。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 17;15:1468900. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1468900. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Degree of Acceptance of Virtual Reality by Health Sciences Students.卫生科学专业学生对虚拟现实的接受程度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 18;20(8):5571. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085571.
2
Factors predicting University students' behavioral intention to use eLearning platforms in the post-pandemic normal: an UTAUT2 approach with 'Learning Value'.预测大学生在疫情后常态化下使用电子学习平台行为意向的因素:采用包含“学习价值”的UTAUT2模型
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(9):12065-12082. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11116-2. Epub 2022 May 25.
3
Teachers' beliefs and practices of technology integration at a school for students with dyslexia: A mixed methods study.
一所诵读困难症学生学校教师的技术整合信念与实践:一项混合方法研究。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(7):10179-10205. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11044-1. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
4
The mediating role of emotions in the relation between beliefs and teachers' job satisfaction.情绪在信念与教师工作满意度关系中的中介作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Jun;226:103580. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103580. Epub 2022 Mar 31.