Tian Yu-Quan, Chen Di-Kun, Zhang He-Ming, Sun Yong-Mei
Department of Anesthesiology, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Jinan, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Jinan Seventh People's Hospital, Jinan, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Oct 17;15:1404536. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1404536. eCollection 2024.
The aim of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the therapeutic outcomes associated with the administration of remimazolam and propofol during painless endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures in older adults.
A total of 140 older adults who underwent elective painless ERCP were randomly assigned to two groups using the random number table method: the remimazolam group and the propofol group, each consisting of 70 patients. In the remimazolam group, anesthesia was administered using a combination of remimazolam and opioids, while in the propofol group, a combination of propofol and opioids was used. Comparative assessments between the two groups included anesthesia induction time, first induction success rate, intraoperative hemodynamics, awakening duration, stress response index, and the incidence of adverse reactions.
The remimazolam group exhibited a prolonged anesthesia induction time compared to the propofol group and a lower success rate of first induction ( < 0.05). At the point of endoscope entry (T2) and 10 min post-operation (T3), patients in the remimazolam group demonstrated higher mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and bispectral index (BIS) values compared to those in the propofol group ( < 0.05). Furthermore, the remimazolam group had shorter durations for eye-opening, consciousness recovery, and residence in the recovery room compared to the propofol group < 0.05). Post-surgery levels of epinephrine (E), norepinephrine (NE), and cortisol (Cor) at 24 h were lower in the remimazolam group than in the propofol group ( < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in the remimazolam group (18.57%) compared to the propofol group (31.43%) ( < 0.05).
Remimazolam exhibits a longer induction time compared to propofol in the painless diagnosis and treatment of ERCP in older adults. However, it provides a more stable circulatory state post-induction and throughout the operation, reduces stress response, enables rapid recovery, and has a lower incidence of serious adverse reactions. These attributes suggest that remimazolam has potential for widespread clinical application and adoption.
clinicaltrials.gov, identifier ChiCTR2400080926.
本研究旨在对老年患者在无痛内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)手术中使用瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚的治疗效果进行对比分析。
采用随机数字表法将140例行择期无痛ERCP的老年患者随机分为两组:瑞马唑仑组和丙泊酚组,每组70例。瑞马唑仑组采用瑞马唑仑与阿片类药物联合给药进行麻醉,丙泊酚组采用丙泊酚与阿片类药物联合给药。两组间的比较评估包括麻醉诱导时间、首次诱导成功率、术中血流动力学、苏醒时间、应激反应指数及不良反应发生率。
与丙泊酚组相比,瑞马唑仑组麻醉诱导时间延长,首次诱导成功率较低(P<0.05)。在内镜插入时(T2)及术后10分钟(T3),瑞马唑仑组患者的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)及脑电双频指数(BIS)值均高于丙泊酚组(P<0.05)。此外,瑞马唑仑组的睁眼时间、意识恢复时间及在恢复室停留时间均短于丙泊酚组(P<0.05)。术后24小时瑞马唑仑组肾上腺素(E)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)及皮质醇(Cor)水平低于丙泊酚组(P<0.05)。瑞马唑仑组不良反应发生率(18.57%)明显低于丙泊酚组(31.43%)(P<0.05)。
在老年患者无痛ERCP诊断和治疗中,瑞马唑仑诱导时间较丙泊酚长。然而,诱导后及整个手术过程中其循环状态更稳定,应激反应减轻,恢复快,严重不良反应发生率低。这些特性表明瑞马唑仑具有广泛临床应用的潜力。
clinicaltrials.gov,标识符ChiCTR2400080926。