Xiao Yan-Ying, Zou Hai-Ding, Qin Xiu-Nan, Zhu Rong, Dai Ru-Ping
From the Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Anesth Analg. 2025 Jul 1;141(1):90-99. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007309. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
Intraoperative hypotension is the most common adverse event in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and is usually attributed to the vasodilatory effect of the anesthetic. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the impact of remimazolam versus propofol on blood pressure changes during the therapeutic ERCP procedure.
Adult patients scheduled for elective therapeutic ERCP were randomized to receive either remimazolam or propofol anesthesia (40 patients in each group). The primary outcomes included the change in mean arterial pressure (MAP) during induction and the area under the baseline (AUB), calculated as the blood pressure below baseline multiplied by the duration, throughout the procedure. These measures, respectively, indicated the severity of blood pressure decrease during anesthesia induction and the overall impact of blood pressure changes throughout the procedure. Any incidences of hypotension, defined as MAP <65 mm Hg for at least 1 minute, were recorded. The recovery time and any adverse events were also reported.
The change in MAP after induction was smaller in the remimazolam group compared to the propofol group (-7.5 [-14.0 to 0] mm Hg vs -25.0 [-33.8 to -14.3] mm Hg), with a median difference of 17.0 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.0-22.0; P <.001). The AUB in the remimazolam group was less than in the propofol group (-373 [-82 to -854] mm Hg·min vs -705 [-272 to -1100] mm Hg·min), with a median difference of 255 mm Hg·min (95% CI, 29-477; P =.021). The incidence of hypotension was significantly lower for remimazolam than propofol (5% vs 30%; P =.006). There were no serious adverse events in either group.
Remimazolam may be considered as an alternative to propofol for general anesthesia during therapeutic ERCP procedures, with the potential advantage of stable hemodynamics.
术中低血压是内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)中最常见的不良事件,通常归因于麻醉药的血管舒张作用。这项随机对照试验的目的是评估瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚对治疗性ERCP手术期间血压变化的影响。
计划进行择期治疗性ERCP的成年患者被随机分为接受瑞马唑仑或丙泊酚麻醉(每组40例患者)。主要结局包括诱导期间平均动脉压(MAP)的变化以及基线以下面积(AUB),AUB通过将低于基线的血压乘以整个手术过程的持续时间来计算。这些指标分别表明麻醉诱导期间血压下降的严重程度以及整个手术过程中血压变化的总体影响。记录任何低血压事件,定义为MAP<65 mmHg至少持续1分钟。还报告了恢复时间和任何不良事件。
与丙泊酚组相比,瑞马唑仑组诱导后MAP的变化较小(-7.5 [-14.0至0] mmHg对-25.0 [-33.8至-14.3] mmHg),中位数差异为17.0 mmHg(95%置信区间[CI],12.0 - 22.0;P<.001)。瑞马唑仑组的AUB低于丙泊酚组(-373 [-82至-854] mmHg·min对-705 [-27至-1100] mmHg·min),中位数差异为255 mmHg·min(95% CI,29 - 477;P =.021)。瑞马唑仑组的低血压发生率明显低于丙泊酚组(5%对30%;P =.006)。两组均未发生严重不良事件。
在治疗性ERCP手术期间,瑞马唑仑可被视为丙泊酚全身麻醉的替代药物,具有血流动力学稳定的潜在优势。