• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

身体成分作为评估未来肺癌风险的生物标志物。

Body composition as a biomarker for assessing future lung cancer risk.

作者信息

Wang Jing, Leader Joseph K, Meng Xin, Yu Tong, Wang Renwei, Herman James, Yuan Jian-Min, Wilson David, Pu Jiantao

出版信息

medRxiv. 2024 Oct 15:2024.10.14.24315477. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.14.24315477.

DOI:10.1101/2024.10.14.24315477
PMID:39484267
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11527065/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate if body composition is a biomarker for assessing the risk of developing lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans from the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS) (n=3,635, 22 follow-up years) and NLST-ACRIN (n=16,435, 8 follow-up years) cohorts were used in the study. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms were developed to automatically segment and quantify subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), skeletal muscle (SM), and bone. Cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the hazard ratios (HRs). Standard time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic ability of different models over time.

RESULTS

The final composite models were formed by seven variables: age (HR=1.20), current smoking status (HR=1.59), bone volume (HR=1.79), SM density (HR=0.29), IMAT ratio (HR=0.33), IMAT density (HR=0.56), and SAT volume (HR=0.56). The models trained on the PLuSS cohort achieved a mean AUC of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.74-0.79) over 21 follow-up years and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66-0.74) over the first 7 follow-up years for predicting lung cancer development within the PLuSS cohort. In contrast, models trained on the PLuSS cohort alone, as well as in combination with the NLST cohorts, achieved an AUC ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 in the NLST cohort over a 7-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Body composition assessed on LDCT is a significant predictor of lung cancer risk and could improve the effectiveness of LDCT lung cancer screening by optimizing the screening eligibility and frequency.

SUMMARY STATEMENT

Body composition assessed on LDCT is a significant predictor of lung cancer risk and could improve the effectiveness of LDCT lung cancer screening by optimizing the screening eligibility and frequency.

KEY POINTS

This study unveils the significant associations between body tissues and lung cancer risk.The prediction models based on body composition alone, as well as the combination of demographics and body composition features can effectively identify patients at higher risk of developing lung cancer.

摘要

目的

研究身体成分是否为评估肺癌发生风险的生物标志物。

材料与方法

本研究使用了来自匹兹堡肺癌筛查研究(PLuSS)(n = 3635,随访22年)和NLST - ACRIN(n = 16435,随访8年)队列的低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)数据。开发了人工智能(AI)算法以自动分割并量化皮下脂肪组织(SAT)、内脏脂肪组织(VAT)、肌内脂肪组织(IMAT)、骨骼肌(SM)和骨骼。采用特定病因的Cox比例风险模型来评估风险比(HRs)。使用标准的时间依赖性受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来评估不同模型随时间的预后能力。

结果

最终的综合模型由七个变量构成:年龄(HR = 1.20)、当前吸烟状态(HR = 1.59)、骨体积(HR = 1.79)、SM密度(HR = 0.29)、IMAT比例(HR = 0.33)、IMAT密度(HR = 0.56)和SAT体积(HR = 0.56)。在PLuSS队列上训练的模型在21年的随访期内预测PLuSS队列中肺癌发生的平均AUC为0.76(95% CI:0.74 - 0.79),在前7年的随访期内为0.70(95% CI:0.66 - 0.74)。相比之下,仅在PLuSS队列上训练的模型以及与NLST队列联合训练的模型在NLST队列7年的随访期内AUC范围为0.61至0.68。

结论

基于LDCT评估的身体成分是肺癌风险的重要预测指标,通过优化筛查资格和频率可提高LDCT肺癌筛查的有效性。

总结声明

基于LDCT评估的身体成分是肺癌风险的重要预测指标,通过优化筛查资格和频率可提高LDCT肺癌筛查的有效性。

关键点

本研究揭示了身体组织与肺癌风险之间的显著关联。仅基于身体成分以及人口统计学和身体成分特征相结合的预测模型能够有效识别肺癌发生风险较高的患者。

相似文献

1
Body composition as a biomarker for assessing future lung cancer risk.身体成分作为评估未来肺癌风险的生物标志物。
medRxiv. 2024 Oct 15:2024.10.14.24315477. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.14.24315477.
2
Beyond nodules: body composition as a biomarker for future lung cancer.超越结节:身体成分作为未来肺癌的生物标志物
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11735-6.
3
AI-based Hepatic Steatosis Detection and Integrated Hepatic Assessment from Cardiac CT Attenuation Scans Enhances All-cause Mortality Risk Stratification: A Multi-center Study.基于人工智能的心脏CT衰减扫描检测肝脂肪变性及综合肝脏评估可增强全因死亡风险分层:一项多中心研究
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 11:2025.06.09.25329157. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.09.25329157.
4
Impact of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer-related mortality.低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查对肺癌相关死亡率的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 3;8(8):CD013829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013829.pub2.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
A generalized health index: automated thoracic CT-derived biomarkers predict life expectancy.一种通用健康指数:基于胸部CT自动生成的生物标志物可预测预期寿命。
Br J Radiol. 2025 Mar 1;98(1167):412-421. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqae234.
7
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
8
The role of body composition and pulmonary function in predicting long-term survival after lung cancer surgery.身体成分和肺功能在预测肺癌手术后长期生存中的作用。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2025 Aug;68:140-147. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.04.009. Epub 2025 May 9.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Undernutrition as a risk factor for tuberculosis disease.营养不良是结核病的一个风险因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 11;6(6):CD015890. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015890.pub2.