Suppr超能文献

用于检测干血斑和口腔液中SARS-CoV-2抗体的微球免疫测定法的实验室间协调

Inter-laboratory harmonization of microsphere immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection in dried blood spots and oral fluids.

作者信息

DeRosa Kate L, Pisanic Nora, Kruczynski Kate, Heaney Christopher D, Styer Linda M, Mantis Nicholas J

机构信息

Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY.

Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 22:2024.10.19.619238. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.19.619238.

Abstract

Dried blood spots (DBS) and oral fluids (OF) are easily attainable biospecimen types that have enabled population scale antibody monitoring for SARS-CoV-2 exposure and vaccination. However, the degree to which the two different biospecimen types can be used interchangeably remains unclear. To begin to address this question, we generated contrived DBS (cDBS) and OF (cOF) from serum panels from SARS-CoV-2 infected, vaccinated, and uninfected individuals. The contrived samples were evaluated using SARS-CoV-2 multiplexed microsphere immunoassays (MIAs) at two different institutions. Intra-laboratory tests revealed near perfect agreement between cDBS and cOF for N and S antigens, as evidenced by κ = 0.97-1 and 98%-100% agreement. Inter-laboratory comparisons were equally robust for both N (κ = 0.94-0.96; 97.5%-98 % agreement) and S (κ = 0.98 -1.0; 99.0%-100%). Furthermore, assays were transferred between labs, including methods and reagents, and a subset of cDBS and cOF samples (n = 52) were tested. Qualitative concordance remained high (κ = 0.94-1.0; 97.5%-100% agreement), confirming that integrity of the assays is retained upon transfer. In summary, our results provide evidence that DBS and OF can be used interchangeably across laboratories and institutions for the qualitative assessment of SARS-CoV-2 antibody determinations.

摘要

干血斑(DBS)和口腔液(OF)是易于获取的生物样本类型,已能够在人群层面监测针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)暴露和疫苗接种的抗体情况。然而,这两种不同生物样本类型可互换使用的程度仍不明确。为了开始解决这个问题,我们从感染SARS-CoV-2、接种疫苗和未感染个体的血清样本中制备了人工干血斑(cDBS)和人工口腔液(cOF)。在两个不同机构使用SARS-CoV-2多重微球免疫测定法(MIA)对制备的样本进行了评估。实验室内测试显示,cDBS和cOF在N和S抗原方面几乎完全一致,κ值为0.97 - 1以及一致性为98% - 100%证明了这一点。实验室间比较在N(κ = 0.94 - 0.94;一致性为97.5% - 98%)和S(κ = 0.98 - 1.0;一致性为99.0% - 100%)方面同样可靠。此外,检测方法和试剂在不同实验室之间进行了转移,并对一部分cDBS和cOF样本(n = 52)进行了测试。定性一致性仍然很高(κ = 0.94 - 1.0;一致性为97.5% - 100%),证实了检测方法在转移后仍保持完整性。总之,我们的结果表明,在不同实验室和机构之间,DBS和OF可互换用于SARS-CoV-2抗体测定的定性评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68aa/11527004/a899350599e3/nihpp-2024.10.19.619238v1-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验