Suppr超能文献

不明原因婴儿死亡且无不安全睡眠因素:2011 年至 2020 年。

Unexplained Infant Deaths Without Unsafe Sleep Factors: 2011 to 2020.

作者信息

Cottengim Carri, Batra Erich, Erck Lambert Alexa B, Parks Sharyn E, Colarusso Tiffany, Bundock Elizabeth, Shapiro-Mendoza Carrie K

机构信息

Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2024 Nov 1;154(Suppl 3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2024-067043G.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe sudden unexpected infant deaths (SUIDs) occurring in safe sleep environments and explore differences in selected characteristics.

METHODS

We examined SUID from 22 jurisdictions from 2011 to 2020 and classified them as unexplained, no unsafe sleep factors (U-NUSF). Data were derived from the Sudden Unexpected Infant Death and Sudden Death in the Young Case Registry, a population-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance system built on the National Center for Fatality Review and Prevention's child death review program. SUID classified as U-NUSF included infants who were (1) awake, under supervision, and witnessed to become unresponsive or (2) found unresponsive in a safe sleep environment after sleep (unwitnessed). We calculated frequencies and percentages for demographics, birth and environmental characteristics, medical history, and death investigation findings.

RESULTS

Most of the 117 U-NUSF SUID occurred before 4 months of age. Witnessed deaths most commonly occurred at <1 month of age (28%), whereas unwitnessed deaths most commonly occurred at ages 2 to 3 months (44%) Among all U-NUSF, 69% occurred in the infant's home (62% witnessed, 77% unwitnessed). All unwitnessed deaths occurred in a crib; most witnessed deaths occurred while being held (54%) or in a car seat traveling (18%). Most infants (84%) had no history of abuse or neglect. Abnormal autopsy findings were reported in 46% of deaths (49% witnessed, 42% unwitnessed).

CONCLUSIONS

Characterizing these deaths is key to advancing our knowledge of SUID etiology. Our study revealed a heterogeneous group of infants, suggesting physiologic, genetic, or environmental etiologies.

摘要

目的

描述发生在安全睡眠环境中的意外婴儿猝死(SUID),并探讨所选特征的差异。

方法

我们检查了 2011 年至 2020 年来自 22 个司法管辖区的 SUID,并将其分类为不明原因、无不安全睡眠因素(U-NUSF)。数据来自突发意外婴儿死亡和青年死亡病例登记处,这是一个基于疾病控制和预防中心的人口监测系统,建立在国家死亡审查和预防中心儿童死亡审查计划之上。分类为 U-NUSF 的 SUID 包括以下两种情况:(1)清醒、有监督并被目击到失去反应,或(2)在安全睡眠环境中入睡后(无人目击)被发现失去反应。我们计算了人口统计学、出生和环境特征、病史和死亡调查结果的频率和百分比。

结果

大多数 U-NUSF SUID 发生在 4 个月之前。目击死亡最常见于 1 个月以下(28%),而无人目击死亡最常见于 2 至 3 个月(44%)。在所有 U-NUSF 中,69%发生在婴儿的家中(62%目击,77%无人目击)。所有无人目击的死亡都发生在婴儿床中;大多数目击死亡发生在抱着(54%)或在汽车座椅中行驶(18%)时。大多数婴儿(84%)没有虐待或忽视的病史。尸检异常发现报告在 46%的死亡病例中(49%目击,42%无人目击)。

结论

对这些死亡进行特征描述是提高我们对 SUID 病因学认识的关键。我们的研究揭示了一组异质的婴儿,提示存在生理、遗传或环境病因。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验