Russell Mark D, Yang Zijing, Dooley Niamh, Gibson Mark, Zuckerman Benjamin, Adas Maryam A, Alveyn Edward, Patel Samir, Bechman Katie, Price Elizabeth, Gallagher Sarah, Coalwood Callum, Cope Andrew P, Norton Sam, Galloway James B
Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Rheumatology, Great Western Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, UK.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 May 1;64(5):2432-2441. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae607.
The objective of this study was to evaluate temporal and regional variation in biologic and targeted synthetic DMARD (b/tsDMARD) initiation for RA in England and Wales.
An observational cohort study was conducted for people with RA enrolled in the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) between May 2018 and April 2022 who had 12-month follow-up data available. Temporal trends in escalation to b/tsDMARDs within 12 months of initial rheumatology assessment were explored, including comparisons before and after publication (July 2021) of national guidelines that lowered the threshold for b/tsDMARD initiation to include moderate-severity RA. Case-mix-adjusted, mixed-effects regression was used to evaluate regional and hospital-level variation in b/tsDMARD initiation.
Of 6098 RA patients with available follow-up, 508 (8.3%) initiated b/tsDMARDs within 12 months of initial assessment. b/tsDMARD escalation increased marginally towards the end of the study period (9.2% in May 2021/22); however, no significant differences were evident after guidelines were published permitting b/tsDMARD use for moderate-severity RA. The proportion of individuals escalated to b/tsDMARDs varied considerably between regions, ranging from 5.1% in Wales to 10.7% in North-West England. Following case-mix adjustment, the intraclass correlation (ICC) for hospitals within regions was 0.17, compared with a between-region ICC of 0.0, suggesting that the observable regional variation reflected hospital-level differences rather than systematic differences between regions themselves.
There is marked variation in escalation to b/tsDMARDs for people newly diagnosed with RA throughout England and Wales, despite a universal health-care system. These disparities must be addressed if we are to deliver equitable access to b/tsDMARDs, regardless of geography.
本研究旨在评估英格兰和威尔士类风湿关节炎(RA)患者启动生物制剂和靶向合成改善病情抗风湿药(b/tsDMARD)治疗的时间和地区差异。
对2018年5月至2022年4月纳入国家早期炎症性关节炎审计(NEIAA)且有12个月随访数据的RA患者进行了一项观察性队列研究。探讨了在初次风湿病评估后12个月内升级使用b/tsDMARD的时间趋势,包括在国家指南(2021年7月)发布前后进行比较,该指南降低了b/tsDMARD启动阈值,将中度至重度RA纳入其中。采用病例组合调整的混合效应回归来评估b/tsDMARD启动的地区和医院层面差异。
在6098例有可用随访数据的RA患者中,508例(8.3%)在初次评估后12个月内启动了b/tsDMARD。在研究期结束时,b/tsDMARD升级略有增加(2021年5月/22年为9.2%);然而,在允许对中度至重度RA使用b/tsDMARD的指南发布后,没有明显差异。升级使用b/tsDMARD的个体比例在不同地区差异很大,从威尔士的5.1%到英格兰西北部的10.7%不等。经过病例组合调整后,地区内医院的组内相关系数(ICC)为0.17,而地区间ICC为0.0,这表明可观察到的地区差异反映的是医院层面的差异,而非地区本身的系统性差异。
尽管有全民医疗保健系统,但在英格兰和威尔士,新诊断为RA的患者在升级使用b/tsDMARD方面仍存在显著差异。如果我们要实现无论地理位置如何都能公平获得b/tsDMARD治疗,就必须解决这些差异。