Jin Yinzhu, Desai Rishi J, Liu Jun, Choi Nam-Kyong, Kim Seoyoung C
Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Suite 3030, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
Institute of Environmental Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 Jul 5;19(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1366-1.
Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are increasingly used for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. However, little is known based on contemporary data about the factors associated with DMARDs and patterns of use of biologic DMARDs for initial and subsequent RA treatment.
We conducted an observational cohort study using claims data from a commercial health plan (2004-2013) and Medicaid (2000-2010) in three study groups: patients with early untreated RA who were naïve to any type of DMARD and patients with prevalent RA with or without prior exposure to one biologic DMARD. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the effect of patient demographics, clinical characteristics and healthcare utilization factors on the initial and subsequent choice of biologic DMARDs for RA.
We identified a total of 195,433 RA patients including 78,667 (40%) with early untreated RA and 93,534 (48%) and 23,232 (12%) with prevalent RA, without or with prior biologic DMARD treatment, respectively. Patients in the commercial insurance were 87% more likely to initiate a biologic DMARD versus patients in Medicaid (OR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.70-2.05). In Medicaid, African-Americans had lower odds of initiating (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.51-0.68 in early untreated RA; OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.61-0.74 in prevalent RA) and switching (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.55-0.90) biologic DMARDs than non-Hispanic whites. Prior use of steroid and non-biologic DMARDs predicted both biologic DMARD initiation and subsequent switching. Etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab were the most commonly used first-line and second-line biologic DMARDS; patients on anakinra and golimumab were most likely to be switched to other biologic DMARDS.
Insurance type, race, and previous use of steroids and non-biologic DMARDs were strongly associated with initial or subsequent treatment with biologic DMARDs.
生物性疾病改善抗风湿药物(DMARDs)越来越多地用于类风湿性关节炎(RA)的治疗。然而,基于当代数据,对于与DMARDs相关的因素以及生物性DMARDs用于RA初始治疗和后续治疗的使用模式知之甚少。
我们使用来自一个商业健康计划(2004 - 2013年)和医疗补助计划(2000 - 2010年)的理赔数据,在三个研究组中开展了一项观察性队列研究:未接受过任何类型DMARD治疗的早期未治疗RA患者,以及既往有或无生物性DMARD暴露史的现患RA患者。多变量逻辑回归模型用于检验患者人口统计学、临床特征和医疗利用因素对RA生物性DMARDs初始选择和后续选择的影响。
我们共识别出195,433例RA患者,其中78,667例(40%)为早期未治疗RA患者,93,534例(48%)和23,232例(12%)为现患RA患者,分别未接受过生物性DMARD治疗和有过生物性DMARD治疗史。商业保险患者启动生物性DMARD治疗的可能性比医疗补助计划患者高87%(比值比[OR]=1.87,95%置信区间[CI]=1.70 - 2.05)。在医疗补助计划中,非裔美国人启动(早期未治疗RA患者中OR = 0.59,95% CI = 0.51 - 0.68;现患RA患者中OR = 0.71,95% CI = 0.61 - 0.74)和转换(OR = 0.71,95% CI = 0.55 - 0.90)生物性DMARD治疗的几率低于非西班牙裔白人。既往使用类固醇和非生物性DMARDs可预测生物性DMARD的启动和后续转换。依那西普、阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗是最常用的一线和二线生物性DMARDs;使用阿那白滞素和戈利木单抗的患者最有可能转换为其他生物性DMARDs。
保险类型、种族以及既往使用类固醇和非生物性DMARDs与生物性DMARDs的初始或后续治疗密切相关。