Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Minnesota HealthSolutions Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(sup1):S175-S182. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2375759. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
Although child safety seats are highly effective in preventing injuries, they are frequently misused. Experts have identified two leading "critical misuses": (1) loose harness straps and (2) loose vehicle attachment at the base. We designed an innovative child safety seat system that educates, instructs, and alarms participants of safety seat errors. The system includes both the Cellular Car Seat (CCS) smartphone app and a network of car seat sensors. Our objective was to determine if CCS system users had fewer child safety seat misuses than users with a child safety seat manual alone.
During the study visit, 92 participants completed three safety seat scenarios using a mock vehicle setup, test doll, and a convertible child safety seat: A) fully install a convertible safety seat, B) recognizing/correcting loose harness straps in a seat with intentionally loose straps, and C) recognizing/correcting loose attachment to the vehicle seat at the base in a seat with intentionally loose attachment. Intervention participants ( = 46) were asked to use the CCS app during each scenario and control participants ( = 46) were given only the paper child safety seat manual. For each scenario, researchers determined errors/misuses present at the end of the scenario, time to complete scenario, and tension achieved on the harness straps (collected load cell).
Compared with controls, intervention participants had significantly fewer errors and higher average harness tensions for all three scenarios; furthermore, a greater portion achieved a harness tension of 4 newtons. During Scenario A, the rate of loose harness strap errors was more than three times higher for controls and loose base attachment errors almost six times higher. We observed similar trends in Scenario B, with harness strap errors more than double for controls. In Scenario C, the rates of both critical misuse errors were four times higher for controls compared to the intervention group.
The innovative CCS system was highly effective at reducing child safety seat use errors, especially critical misuses. Reducing critical misuses will decrease injuries and fatalities among crash-involved children. The CCS system can alert families to everyday harnessing and installation errors and provide families and caregivers with ongoing, accessible support.
尽管儿童安全座椅在预防伤害方面非常有效,但它们经常被错误使用。专家已经确定了两个主要的“严重误用”:(1)安全带松动,(2)底座处车辆连接松动。我们设计了一种创新的儿童安全座椅系统,该系统可以教育、指导和提醒安全座椅错误。该系统包括 Cellular Car Seat(CCS)智能手机应用程序和一系列汽车座椅传感器。我们的目标是确定 CCS 系统用户是否比仅使用儿童安全座椅手册的用户发生更少的儿童安全座椅误用。
在研究访问期间,92 名参与者使用模拟车辆设置、测试娃娃和可转换儿童安全座椅完成了三个安全座椅场景:A)完全安装可转换安全座椅,B)识别/纠正故意松动安全带的座椅中的松动安全带,C)识别/纠正底座处松动的车辆座椅连接在故意松动连接的座椅中。干预组参与者(n=46)被要求在每个场景中使用 CCS 应用程序,而对照组参与者(n=46)仅获得纸质儿童安全座椅手册。对于每个场景,研究人员在场景结束时确定存在的错误/误用、完成场景的时间以及安全带的张力(收集负载细胞)。
与对照组相比,干预组在所有三个场景中都明显减少了错误,并且安全带的平均张力更高;此外,更大比例的参与者实现了 4 牛顿的安全带张力。在场景 A 中,对照组的松散安全带错误率高出三倍以上,而松散底座连接错误率高出近六倍。在场景 B 中,我们观察到类似的趋势,对照组的安全带错误率高出一倍以上。在场景 C 中,对照组的两个关键误用错误率均比干预组高出四倍。
创新的 CCS 系统非常有效地减少了儿童安全座椅的使用错误,特别是严重的误用。减少关键误用将降低与碰撞相关的儿童受伤和死亡的风险。CCS 系统可以提醒家庭注意日常的系紧和安装错误,并为家庭和护理人员提供持续、可访问的支持。