Suppr超能文献

数字化与传统全口义齿治疗无牙颌患者的并发症及患者满意度:一项交叉临床研究

Complications and Patient Satisfaction in Fully Edentulous Patients Treated with Digital and Conventional Complete Dentures: A Crossover Clinical Study.

作者信息

Smets Kathleen, D'haese Rani, Bultinck Lisa, Vandeweghe Stefan, Matthys Carine

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2025 Jul 22;38(4):383-390. doi: 10.11607/ijp.9128.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate comfort, satisfaction, chewing ability, and complications with digital complete dentures (DCDs) and conventional complete dentures (CCDs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For 16 edentulous patients, two sets of maxillary and mandibular dentures were fabricated by students in a university dental clinic. The impression for the DCD was done using indirect scanning of the cast. When the patients were pain free, each set of dentures was worn for 4 weeks. The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and the Denture Satisfaction Index (DSI) were used to measure patient satisfaction and chewing ability, respectively. Both questionnaires were administered before fabrication and after wearing each set. Adjustments made during the follow-up period were included. At the end of the study, patients could express which set of dentures they preferred. The 25 dental students involved in fabricating the dentures were questioned in terms of discomfort, preference, and future use for both techniques.

RESULTS

OHIP-14 showed significantly higher scores for DCDs for the domain concerning psychologic discomfort. The DSI showed no significant difference for both sets of dentures. In terms of complications, a significant difference was found for occlusion. DCDs required more occlusal adjustments. A minority of the patients (37.5%) chose DCDs as their favorite set. The students preferred the wax try-in and workflow of the CCDs.

CONCLUSIONS

CCDs and DCDs showed differences in patient satisfaction. Chewing ability was comparable for both sets of dentures. More occlusal complications were seen in DCDs. Both students and patients preferred the CCDs.

摘要

目的

评估数字化全口义齿(DCD)和传统全口义齿(CCD)的舒适度、满意度、咀嚼能力及并发症情况。

材料与方法

在一所大学牙科诊所,由学生为16名无牙颌患者制作了上颌和下颌的两套义齿。DCD的印模采用模型间接扫描法获取。当患者无疼痛时,每组义齿佩戴4周。分别使用口腔健康影响程度量表(OHIP - 14)和义齿满意度指数(DSI)来测量患者满意度和咀嚼能力。两份问卷均在义齿制作前及佩戴每组义齿后进行发放。随访期间所做的调整也纳入其中。在研究结束时,患者可以表达他们更喜欢哪一组义齿。参与义齿制作的25名牙科学生就两种技术的不适感、偏好及未来使用情况接受了询问。

结果

OHIP - 14显示,在心理不适方面,DCD的得分显著更高。DSI显示两组义齿无显著差异。在并发症方面,发现咬合情况存在显著差异。DCD需要更多的咬合调整。少数患者(37.5%)选择DCD作为他们最喜欢的一组。学生们更喜欢CCD的蜡型试戴和制作流程。

结论

CCD和DCD在患者满意度方面存在差异。两组义齿的咀嚼能力相当。DCD出现了更多的咬合并发症。学生和患者都更喜欢CCD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验