• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字化与传统全口义齿治疗无牙颌患者的并发症及患者满意度:一项交叉临床研究

Complications and Patient Satisfaction in Fully Edentulous Patients Treated with Digital and Conventional Complete Dentures: A Crossover Clinical Study.

作者信息

Smets Kathleen, D'haese Rani, Bultinck Lisa, Vandeweghe Stefan, Matthys Carine

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2025 Jul 22;38(4):383-390. doi: 10.11607/ijp.9128.

DOI:10.11607/ijp.9128
PMID:39486002
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate comfort, satisfaction, chewing ability, and complications with digital complete dentures (DCDs) and conventional complete dentures (CCDs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For 16 edentulous patients, two sets of maxillary and mandibular dentures were fabricated by students in a university dental clinic. The impression for the DCD was done using indirect scanning of the cast. When the patients were pain free, each set of dentures was worn for 4 weeks. The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and the Denture Satisfaction Index (DSI) were used to measure patient satisfaction and chewing ability, respectively. Both questionnaires were administered before fabrication and after wearing each set. Adjustments made during the follow-up period were included. At the end of the study, patients could express which set of dentures they preferred. The 25 dental students involved in fabricating the dentures were questioned in terms of discomfort, preference, and future use for both techniques.

RESULTS

OHIP-14 showed significantly higher scores for DCDs for the domain concerning psychologic discomfort. The DSI showed no significant difference for both sets of dentures. In terms of complications, a significant difference was found for occlusion. DCDs required more occlusal adjustments. A minority of the patients (37.5%) chose DCDs as their favorite set. The students preferred the wax try-in and workflow of the CCDs.

CONCLUSIONS

CCDs and DCDs showed differences in patient satisfaction. Chewing ability was comparable for both sets of dentures. More occlusal complications were seen in DCDs. Both students and patients preferred the CCDs.

摘要

目的

评估数字化全口义齿(DCD)和传统全口义齿(CCD)的舒适度、满意度、咀嚼能力及并发症情况。

材料与方法

在一所大学牙科诊所,由学生为16名无牙颌患者制作了上颌和下颌的两套义齿。DCD的印模采用模型间接扫描法获取。当患者无疼痛时,每组义齿佩戴4周。分别使用口腔健康影响程度量表(OHIP - 14)和义齿满意度指数(DSI)来测量患者满意度和咀嚼能力。两份问卷均在义齿制作前及佩戴每组义齿后进行发放。随访期间所做的调整也纳入其中。在研究结束时,患者可以表达他们更喜欢哪一组义齿。参与义齿制作的25名牙科学生就两种技术的不适感、偏好及未来使用情况接受了询问。

结果

OHIP - 14显示,在心理不适方面,DCD的得分显著更高。DSI显示两组义齿无显著差异。在并发症方面,发现咬合情况存在显著差异。DCD需要更多的咬合调整。少数患者(37.5%)选择DCD作为他们最喜欢的一组。学生们更喜欢CCD的蜡型试戴和制作流程。

结论

CCD和DCD在患者满意度方面存在差异。两组义齿的咀嚼能力相当。DCD出现了更多的咬合并发症。学生和患者都更喜欢CCD。

相似文献

1
Complications and Patient Satisfaction in Fully Edentulous Patients Treated with Digital and Conventional Complete Dentures: A Crossover Clinical Study.数字化与传统全口义齿治疗无牙颌患者的并发症及患者满意度:一项交叉临床研究
Int J Prosthodont. 2025 Jul 22;38(4):383-390. doi: 10.11607/ijp.9128.
2
Final-impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures.制作全口义齿和可摘局部义齿的终印模技术及材料。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 4;4(4):CD012256. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012256.pub2.
3
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: denture chewing surface designs in edentulous people.缺失牙修复干预措施:无牙颌患者的义齿咀嚼面设计
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD004941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004941.pub2.
4
Impact of mandibular 4-implant overdenture base construction techniques on assessment of occlusion with digital occlusion analysis system (clinical crossover study).下颌4种植体覆盖义齿基托构建技术对使用数字咬合分析系统评估咬合的影响(临床交叉研究)。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 30;25(1):853. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06228-3.
5
Fully digital versus conventional workflow: Are removable complete overdentures equally good? A randomized crossover trial.全数字化与传统工作流程:可摘全口覆盖义齿效果相同吗?一项随机交叉试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e13398. doi: 10.1111/cid.13398. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
6
Clinical outcomes of milled, 3D-printed, and conventional complete dentures in edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.无牙患者中铣削式、3D 打印式和传统全口义齿的临床效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthodont. 2024 Oct;33(8):736-747. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13859. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
7
Comparison of denture space and patient satisfaction for neutral zone versus standard-designed digital dentures restoring mandibular resorbed ridges: A crossover randomized clinical trial.用于修复下颌吸收性牙槽嵴的中性区义齿空间与标准设计数字义齿的患者满意度比较:一项交叉随机临床试验。
J Prosthodont. 2025 Mar;34(3):252-262. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13964. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
8
Comparison of Implant-Retained Overdenture and Conventional Complete Denture: A Survey Study to Measure Patients' Satisfaction and Quality of Life in Dental School Clinics.种植体支持覆盖义齿与传统全口义齿的比较:一项在牙科诊所测量患者满意度和生活质量的调查研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2024 Jun 1;50(3):266-276. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-22-00096.
9
Improving masticatory performance, bite force, nutritional state and patient's satisfaction with implant overdentures: a systematic review of the literature.改善种植覆盖义齿的咀嚼性能、咬合力、营养状况及患者满意度:文献系统综述
J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Mar;42(3):220-33. doi: 10.1111/joor.12241. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
10
Occlusal designs on masticatory ability and patient satisfaction with complete denture: a systematic review.咬合设计对咀嚼能力及全口义齿患者满意度的影响:一项系统评价
J Dent. 2013 Nov;41(11):1036-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.016. Epub 2013 Aug 1.