• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科人群中虐待性头部创伤的风险因素。

Risk factors for abusive head trauma in the pediatric population.

作者信息

Adachi Kaho, Srivatsa Adith, Raymundo Allison, Bhargava Daksh, Mehta Ankit I

机构信息

1University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago; and.

2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2024 Nov 1;35(2):111-117. doi: 10.3171/2024.8.PEDS24205. Print 2025 Feb 1.

DOI:10.3171/2024.8.PEDS24205
PMID:39486073
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Abusive head trauma (AHT) is the leading cause of death from physical child abuse in children younger than 5 years of age in the United States. The mortality rate among patients with AHT is 25%, and the recurrence rate of child abuse rises to 35% when there is a lack of intervention. Thus, identifying child abuse is crucial yet especially challenging for infants and toddlers as they are preverbal. Current guidelines for child abuse do not sufficiently address the specific needs of a younger population. This study aimed to evaluate clinical factors associated with abuse among such populations.

METHODS

The National Trauma Data Bank was queried from 2017 to 2019 for patients younger than 3 years with acute head trauma. Patients who were suspected of having experienced child abuse (suspected child abuse [SCA] group) were propensity score matched with patients who were not suspected of having experienced child abuse (non-SCA group) based on demographics, comorbidities, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores. Paired Student t-test and chi-square tests were used to compare differences in hospital outcomes between the two groups. Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with SCA (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

The authors identified 10,844 patients in the SCA group and 27,912 in the non-SCA group. Regression analysis results showed that patients in the SCA group had higher rates of prematurity (OR 2.30, p < 0.001), GCS scores < 13 (OR 1.79, p < 0.001), congenital disorders (OR 1.56, p < 0.001), and public insurance use (68.38% vs 52.88% p < 0.001). Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to be in the SCA group (OR 1.56, p < 0.001 and OR 1.35, p < 0.001, respectively). Following propensity score matching, SCA patients had a longer length of hospital stay (3.17 vs 1.34 days, p < 0.001) and higher mortality rate (4.89% vs 3.58%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute head injuries in the SCA group were associated with prematurity, congenital disorder, low GCS score, and public insurance use. As such, the current guidelines should implement clinical history and insurance type to better reflect the at-risk patient population when evaluating infants and toddlers for potential abuse. There could be overidentification of child abuse among Black and Hispanic patients, and further research is warranted.

摘要

目的

在美国,虐待性头部创伤(AHT)是5岁以下儿童身体虐待致死的主要原因。AHT患者的死亡率为25%,在缺乏干预的情况下,虐待儿童的复发率升至35%。因此,识别虐待儿童至关重要,但对于尚不能言语的婴幼儿来说尤其具有挑战性。目前的虐待儿童指南并未充分满足较年轻人群的特殊需求。本研究旨在评估此类人群中与虐待相关的临床因素。

方法

查询2017年至2019年国家创伤数据库中3岁以下急性头部创伤患者的信息。将疑似遭受过虐待儿童的患者(疑似虐待儿童[SCA]组)与未被怀疑遭受过虐待儿童的患者(非SCA组),根据人口统计学、合并症和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分进行倾向得分匹配。采用配对学生t检验和卡方检验比较两组患者的住院结局差异。使用多变量回归分析确定与SCA相关的因素(p<0.05)。

结果

作者在SCA组中识别出10844例患者,在非SCA组中识别出27912例患者。回归分析结果显示,SCA组患者的早产率更高(比值比[OR]2.30,p<0.001)、GCS评分<13(OR 1.79,p<0.001)、先天性疾病(OR 1.56,p<0.001)以及使用公共保险的比例更高(68.38%对52.88%,p<0.001)。黑人和西班牙裔患者更有可能属于SCA组(分别为OR 1.56,p<0.001和OR 1.35,p<0.001)。倾向得分匹配后,SCA组患者的住院时间更长(3.17天对1.34天,p<0.001),死亡率更高(4.89%对3.58%,p<0.001)。

结论

SCA组的急性头部损伤与早产、先天性疾病、低GCS评分和使用公共保险有关。因此,当前指南应纳入临床病史和保险类型,以便在评估婴幼儿是否可能遭受虐待时,能更好地反映高危患者群体。在黑人和西班牙裔患者中可能存在对虐待儿童的过度识别,有必要进行进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for abusive head trauma in the pediatric population.儿科人群中虐待性头部创伤的风险因素。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2024 Nov 1;35(2):111-117. doi: 10.3171/2024.8.PEDS24205. Print 2025 Feb 1.
2
Pediatric abusive head trauma and stroke.小儿虐待性头部创伤与中风。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Aug;20(2):183-190. doi: 10.3171/2017.4.PEDS16650. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
3
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Child Abuse Identification and Inpatient Treatment.儿童虐待识别与住院治疗中的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2451588. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51588.
4
Elevated admission international normalized ratio strongly predicts mortality in victims of abusive head trauma.入院时国际标准化比值升高强烈预示着虐待性头部创伤受害者的死亡率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 May;80(5):711-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000954.
5
Abusive Head Trauma and Mortality-An Analysis From an International Comparative Effectiveness Study of Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.虐待性头部创伤与死亡率——一项关于重度创伤性脑损伤儿童的国际比较效果研究分析
Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug;45(8):1398-1407. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002378.
6
Age-related mortality in abusive head trauma.与年龄相关的虐待性头部创伤死亡率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Oct;87(4):827-835. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002255.
7
Prevalence, severity, and neurosurgical management of abusive head trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间虐待性头部外伤的患病率、严重程度和神经外科治疗。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2023 Mar 31;32(1):19-25. doi: 10.3171/2023.2.PEDS2317. Print 2023 Jul 1.
8
Analysis of missed cases of abusive head trauma.虐待性头部创伤漏诊病例分析。
JAMA. 1999 Feb 17;281(7):621-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.7.621.
9
Racial differences in the evaluation of pediatric fractures for physical abuse.小儿骨折身体虐待评估中的种族差异。
JAMA. 2002 Oct 2;288(13):1603-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.13.1603.
10
Abusive head trauma: an epidemiological and cost analysis.虐待性头部创伤:一项流行病学与成本分析。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Nov;18(5):542-549. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.PEDS15583. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of standardized nursing protocol on nursing quality and complications in pediatric patients with massive scalp hematoma undergoing negative pressure drainage.标准化护理方案对小儿巨大头皮血肿行负压引流患者护理质量及并发症的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):4804-4817. doi: 10.62347/TCZH5661. eCollection 2025.