Tufts University School of Medicine, MA, 02111, Boston, USA.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center/University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA.
Appetite. 2025 Jan 1;204:107744. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107744. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
Although children's dietary intake often resembles that of their parents', dietary resemblance has not been examined among children with intellectual disabilities (ID), where food selectivity is a common parental concern. We compared dietary resemblance in children with typical development (TD), ID, and ID and co-occurring autism (ID + A) in parent-child dyads, and examined whether child food selectivity mediated between-group differences. Dietary data from parents and their children (3-8 years, male = 61.8%, TD = 52.9%, ID = 18.6%, ID + A = 28.4%) were analyzed as mother-child (n = 100) and father-child (n = 70) dyads. Dietary resemblance was operationalized as the proportion of foods that were reported as eaten/not eaten by both parent and child in parent-completed Food Frequency Questionnaires. Food refusal rate was used to capture food selectivity (total foods children would not eat/total foods offered). Among mother-child dyads, dietary resemblance did not differ between children with ID compared to TD (P = 0.243). Among father-child dyads, dietary resemblance was 10% lower in children with ID than TD (66.4% vs. 74.1%, P = 0.032), and the difference was partially explained (mediated) by food refusal. Among mother-child dyads, dietary resemblance was 19% lower among children with ID + A than TD (61.5% vs. 75.6%, P = 0.001), and the difference was completely explained by food refusal. Among father-child dyads, dietary resemblance was 22% lower among children with ID + A than TD (57.9% vs. 74.1%, P < 0.001), and the difference was completely explained by food refusal. Subanalyses by food groups produced similar results. Compared to TD children, dietary resemblance was lower in children with ID + A, but not children with ID, and differences were explained by food selectivity. Our findings suggest parents of children with ID + A may have less influence over their child's dietary intake than parents of children with ID or TD.
尽管儿童的饮食摄入通常与父母相似,但在智力障碍 (ID) 儿童中,饮食相似性尚未得到研究,而食物选择性是父母普遍关注的问题。我们比较了典型发育 (TD)、ID 和 ID 伴自闭症 (ID+A) 儿童及其父母的饮食相似性,并探讨了儿童食物选择性是否在组间差异中起中介作用。从父母及其子女 (3-8 岁,男性占 61.8%,TD 占 52.9%,ID 占 18.6%,ID+A 占 28.4%) 中分析了母子 (n=100) 和父子 (n=70) 对子的饮食数据。饮食相似性是通过父母在完成的食物频率问卷中报告的被父母和孩子双方都吃/不吃的食物比例来操作的。食物拒绝率用于捕获食物选择性(儿童不愿吃的食物总数/提供的食物总数)。在母子对子中,与 TD 儿童相比,ID 儿童的饮食相似性没有差异 (P=0.243)。在父子对子中,ID 儿童的饮食相似性比 TD 儿童低 10%(66.4%比 74.1%,P=0.032),差异部分通过食物拒绝来解释(中介)。在母子对子中,ID+A 儿童的饮食相似性比 TD 儿童低 19%(61.5%比 75.6%,P=0.001),差异完全由食物拒绝来解释。在父子对子中,ID+A 儿童的饮食相似性比 TD 儿童低 22%(57.9%比 74.1%,P<0.001),差异完全由食物拒绝来解释。对食物组的亚分析得出了类似的结果。与 TD 儿童相比,ID+A 儿童的饮食相似性较低,但 ID 儿童的饮食相似性没有差异,差异由食物选择性来解释。我们的研究结果表明,与 ID 儿童相比,ID+A 儿童的父母对其子女的饮食摄入的影响可能较小,而与 TD 儿童的父母相比则更小。