Safety and efficacy of surgical revascularization with percutaneous ventricular assist device for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Japanese national registry study.

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess the safety of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD) in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1198 patients with AMI-CS from the J-PVAD registry, who underwent PVAD support using Impella® (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA) and subsequent revascularization between February 2020 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on the method of coronary revascularization: percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, n = 1084) and CABG (n = 114). The study assessed short-term all-cause and cardiac-related mortality.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The CABG group exhibited significantly lower short-term all-cause mortality compared with the PCI group (30-day: 26.2% vs. 39.9%, 90-day: 45.5% vs. 58.4%, log-rank p = 0.004). Short-term cardiac-related mortality was similar toward low in the CABG group compared with the PCI group (30-day: 18.7% vs. 25.6%, 90-day: 29.4% vs. 35.5%, log-rank p = 0.084). Multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model did not identify revascularization strategy as a risk factor for both all-cause mortality (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.743, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.457-1.208, p = 0.231) and cardiac-related mortality (HR: 0.762, 95% CI: 0.390-1.490, p = 0.427). These results were not attenuated even in subgroup analyses separately comparing CABG alone and hybrid therapy with PCI after propensity score matching. Thus, CABG can be a treatment option with feasible short-term outcomes in patients with AMI-CS under PVAD support.