Martorana Alessandro, Bonomi Chiara Giuseppina, Di Donna Martina Gaia, Motta Caterina
Memory Clinic and Neurodegenerative Dementia Research Unit, University Hospital Policlinico Tor Vergata, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Neurol Ther. 2025 Feb;14(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00675-w. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
Lecanemab (Leqembi, Biogen), a humanized anti-amyloid-beta monoclonal antibody, has been approved for early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD) in several countries, including the US and Japan. However, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recently issued a negative opinion on its marketing authorization, reflecting concerns over the clinical value and manageability of anti-amyloid treatments. This decision highlights the ongoing disconnect between research advancements and clinical practice, where the focus on biological markers over tangible clinical improvements remains contentious. Despite promising biological effects, lecanemab's clinical outcomes have been modest, raising questions about its therapeutic role. The EMA's refusal underscores the need to address doubts surrounding the real-world effectiveness and safety of such treatments, especially concerning amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs), a common side effect observed in clinical trials. The recent approval of lecanemab by the UK's Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, despite the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's rejection on cost-effectiveness grounds, further fuels the debate on the feasibility of anti-amyloid therapies. This commentary emphasizes the importance of real-world data on lecanemab's impact on cognitive decline, daily functioning, and side-effect management. As the global clinical use of lecanemab increases, continuous and standardized reporting on its outcomes is crucial for guiding future regulatory decisions and for potentially bridging the gap between research and practice in AD treatment.
仑卡奈单抗(Leqembi,渤健公司)是一种人源化抗β淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体,已在美国、日本等多个国家被批准用于早期阿尔茨海默病(AD)。然而,欧洲药品管理局(EMA)最近对其上市许可发布了负面意见,反映出对抗淀粉样蛋白治疗的临床价值和可管理性的担忧。这一决定凸显了研究进展与临床实践之间持续存在的脱节,即在临床实践中,关注生物标志物而非切实的临床改善仍然存在争议。尽管仑卡奈单抗具有良好的生物学效应,但其临床疗效并不显著,这引发了人们对其治疗作用的质疑。EMA的拒绝强调了有必要解决围绕此类治疗在现实世界中的有效性和安全性的疑虑,特别是关于淀粉样蛋白相关成像异常(ARIAs),这是在临床试验中观察到的一种常见副作用。尽管英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所基于成本效益理由拒绝了仑卡奈单抗,但英国药品和保健品管理局最近批准了该药物,这进一步加剧了关于抗淀粉样蛋白疗法可行性的争论。这篇评论强调了关于仑卡奈单抗对认知衰退、日常功能和副作用管理影响的真实世界数据的重要性。随着仑卡奈单抗在全球临床应用的增加,持续且标准化地报告其疗效对于指导未来的监管决策以及潜在地弥合AD治疗研究与实践之间的差距至关重要。