University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Panel Chair, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Saint Louis, Missouri.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2024 Nov;21(11S):S504-S517. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.08.016.
Thoracic back pain is a common site for inflammatory, neoplastic, metabolic, infectious, and degenerative conditions, and may be associated with significant disability and morbidity. Uncomplicated acute thoracic back pain and/or radiculopathy does not typically warrant imaging. Imaging may be considered in those patients who have persistent pain despite 6 weeks of conservative treatment. Early imaging may also be warranted in patients presenting with "red flag" history or symptoms, including those with a known or suspected history of cancer, infection, immunosuppression, or trauma; in myelopathic patients; or in those with a history of prior thoracic spine fusion. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
胸背部疼痛是炎症、肿瘤、代谢、感染和退行性疾病的常见部位,可能与严重的残疾和发病率相关。单纯性急性胸背部疼痛和/或神经根病通常不需要影像学检查。对于那些经过 6 周保守治疗后仍持续疼痛的患者,可以考虑进行影像学检查。对于出现“警示症状”的患者,包括已知或疑似癌症、感染、免疫抑制或创伤史的患者、脊髓病患者或有既往胸脊柱融合史的患者,早期影像学检查也可能是必要的。美国放射学院适宜性标准是针对特定临床情况的循证指南,每年由多学科专家小组进行审查。指南的制定和修订过程支持对同行评议期刊的医学文献进行系统分析。既定的方法学原则,如推荐评估、制定和评估分级或 GRADE,被用于评估证据。RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法用户手册提供了用于确定特定临床情况下影像学和治疗程序适宜性的方法。在缺乏或存在争议的同行评议文献的情况下,专家可能是制定建议的主要证据来源。