• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

虚拟咨询对 2 型糖尿病患者护理质量的影响:系统评价和叙述性综合方案。

Impact of virtual consultations on quality of care in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and narrative synthesis protocol.

机构信息

Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK

Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 2;14(11):e082452. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082452.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082452
PMID:39488411
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11535670/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Around 463 million people globally have diabetes, of which over 90% have type 2 diabetes (T2D). Projections indicate an expected increase to 700 million by 2045. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated digital health uptake, establishing virtual consultations as a feasible alternative to traditional in-person care. Despite promising preliminary evidence, a comprehensive review is needed to fully assess the impact of virtual consultations on diabetes care. This review aims to systematically evaluate the impact of remote consultations on the quality of care provided to persons with T2D, by mapping impacts against the six quality domains outlined by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) (ie, patient-centeredness, effectiveness, efficiency, timeliness, equity and safety).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PubMed/MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), COCHRANE Library, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) and Web of Science will be searched for studies published between 2010 and 2024. Primary outcomes will include any quality measures pertaining to the NAM domains for adult patients accessing virtual consultations. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool will be used to assess the quality of the randomised studies, and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions will be used for non-randomised studies. The findings will be summarised as a narrative synthesis. This systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on 15 November 2023 (registration number: CRD42023474219).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This review will not include primary data and therefore does not require ethical approval. This protocol complies with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. Findings will be disseminated as academic publications and conference presentations and summarised into patient-led lay summaries.

摘要

背景

全球约有 4.63 亿人患有糖尿病,其中超过 90%的人患有 2 型糖尿病(T2D)。预计到 2045 年,这一数字将增至 7 亿。COVID-19 大流行加速了数字医疗的普及,使虚拟咨询成为传统面对面护理的可行替代方案。尽管有初步的有希望的证据,但仍需要进行全面审查,以充分评估虚拟咨询对 T2D 患者护理的影响。本综述旨在通过对照国家医学科学院(NAM)概述的六个质量领域(即患者为中心、有效性、效率、及时性、公平性和安全性)来系统评估远程咨询对 T2D 患者护理质量的影响。

方法和分析

将在 2010 年至 2024 年期间,在 PubMed/MEDLINE(医学文献分析和检索系统在线)、考科兰图书馆、EMBASE(医学文摘数据库)、CINAHL(护理和联合健康文献累积索引)和 Web of Science 上搜索研究。主要结果将包括与虚拟咨询成人患者相关的任何质量措施,这些措施涉及 NAM 领域。将使用 Cochrane 协作工具评估随机研究的质量,对于非随机研究,将使用干预措施非随机研究的偏倚风险。研究结果将以叙述性综合形式进行总结。本系统评价方案于 2023 年 11 月 15 日在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册(登记号:CRD42023474219)上进行了登记。

伦理和传播

本综述不包括原始数据,因此不需要伦理批准。本方案符合系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目指南。研究结果将作为学术出版物和会议演讲进行传播,并总结为患者主导的通俗易懂的摘要。

相似文献

1
Impact of virtual consultations on quality of care in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and narrative synthesis protocol.虚拟咨询对 2 型糖尿病患者护理质量的影响:系统评价和叙述性综合方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 2;14(11):e082452. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082452.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Impact of sharing electronic health records with patients on the quality and safety of care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis protocol.与患者共享电子健康记录对医疗质量和安全的影响:一项系统评价与叙述性综合分析方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 13;8(8):e020387. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020387.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions for reducing transmission of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.非药物干预措施对降低 COVID-19 传播的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 22;10(10):e041383. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041383.
6
The Impact of Virtual Consultations on Quality of Care for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.虚拟会诊对2型糖尿病患者护理质量的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Feb 17:19322968251316585. doi: 10.1177/19322968251316585.
7
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
8
Impact of virtual care on health-related quality of life in children with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review protocol.虚拟护理对糖尿病患儿健康相关生活质量的影响:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 16;12(2):e053642. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053642.
9
Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol.识别对初级保健执业护士实践敏感的指标:系统评价方案综述
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 6;11(1):e043213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043213.
10
Patient safety indicators for virtual consultations in primary care: A systematic review protocol.基层医疗虚拟会诊的患者安全指标:一项系统评价方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 9;20(1):e0313639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313639. eCollection 2025.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Virtual Consultations on Quality of Care for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.虚拟会诊对2型糖尿病患者护理质量的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Feb 17:19322968251316585. doi: 10.1177/19322968251316585.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of synchronous teleconsultation for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.同步远程会诊对 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2023 Feb;11(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003180.
2
Remote consultations for diabetes care in a post COVID-19 world.新冠疫情后世界中的糖尿病护理远程会诊
Diabet Med. 2023 Mar;40(3):e14977. doi: 10.1111/dme.14977. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
3
Quality of virtual care for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: Patient and provider experiences.
门诊医疗敏感条件下的虚拟护理质量:患者和提供者的体验。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Sep;165:104812. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104812. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
4
Real-time remote outpatient consultations in secondary and tertiary care: A systematic review of inequalities in invitation and uptake.实时远程门诊咨询在二级和三级保健中的应用:邀请和参与方面不平等的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0269435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269435. eCollection 2022.
5
Aligning Virtual Care in Canada with the Needs of Older Adults.使加拿大的虚拟护理与老年人需求相匹配。
Can J Aging. 2022 Dec;41(4):641-646. doi: 10.1017/S0714980821000623. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
6
Socioeconomic Disparities in the Demand for and Use of Virtual Visits Among Senior Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study.新冠疫情期间老年人虚拟就诊需求与使用情况的社会经济差异:横断面研究
JMIR Aging. 2022 Mar 22;5(1):e35221. doi: 10.2196/35221.
7
A Solution Focused Approach of Delivering Virtual Paediatric Diabetes Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间提供虚拟儿科糖尿病咨询的以解决方案为导向的方法。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;27(1):177-184. doi: 10.1177/13591045211058336. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
8
Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications.医疗保健中的远程医疗:能力、特点、障碍及应用
Sens Int. 2021;2:100117. doi: 10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100117. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
9
Adherence With Online Therapy vs Face-to-Face Therapy and With Online Therapy vs Care as Usual: Secondary Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Trials.在线治疗与面对面治疗的依从性比较,以及在线治疗与常规治疗的依从性比较:两项随机对照试验的二次分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 3;23(11):e31274. doi: 10.2196/31274.
10
Disparities in telehealth use: How should the supportive care community respond?远程医疗使用中的差异:支持性护理社区应如何应对?
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Feb;30(2):1007-1010. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06629-4. Epub 2021 Oct 19.