• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

点击学习:一项纵向的基于案例的多专业脓毒症教育课程。

Click and learn: a longitudinal interprofessional case-based sepsis education curriculum.

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, USA

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Nov 2;13(4):e002859. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002859.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002859
PMID:39488436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11535707/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a global healthcare challenge and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. In the USA, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has integrated the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) into their Core Quality Measures, which has been linked to lower mortality rates. However, SEP-1's multiple bundle elements present compliance challenges without comprehensive education and a collaborative approach involving nurses and providers (attending physicians, resident physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants).

METHODS

We developed a virtual longitudinal, case-based curriculum using Kern's six-step approach to curriculum development and evaluated its effectiveness using the Kirkpatrick model. The curriculum was distributed hospital-wide over a 32-month period.

RESULTS

A total of 3616 responses were received for the Sepsis Case-Based Curriculum modules, with 47% from nurses and 53% from providers. Responses were distributed similarly among medical and surgical specialties, as well as intensive care units. Nurses' responses were 56% correct, and providers' responses were 51% correct. Most respondents expressed a likelihood of applying the learning to their practice and reported increased knowledge of sepsis. Themes from participant feedback indicated that they found the activity informative and applicable to real-world cases. Additionally, the hospital's SEP-1 bundle compliance improved from 71% (Q1 2021) to 80% (Q3 2023) during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Meeting SEP-1 bundle elements requires a team-based approach involving providers and nurses. Given the busy hospital environment and diverse care providers, a longitudinal, engaging and concise educational curriculum related to real-life scenarios can enhance sepsis and SEP-1 education.

摘要

背景

脓毒症是一个全球性的医疗保健挑战,也是发病率和死亡率的主要原因。在美国,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心将严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理包(SEP-1)纳入其核心质量指标,这与降低死亡率有关。然而,SEP-1 的多个捆绑要素如果没有全面的教育和涉及护士和提供者(主治医生、住院医生、执业护士和医师助理)的协作方法,就会带来合规挑战。

方法

我们使用 Kern 的六步课程开发方法开发了一个虚拟的纵向、基于案例的课程,并使用 Kirkpatrick 模型评估其效果。该课程在 32 个月内全院范围内分发。

结果

总共收到了 3616 份关于脓毒症基于案例的课程模块的回复,其中 47%来自护士,53%来自提供者。医疗和外科专业以及重症监护病房的回复分布相似。护士的回复正确率为 56%,提供者的回复正确率为 51%。大多数受访者表示有可能将所学知识应用于实践,并报告说对脓毒症的了解有所增加。来自参与者反馈的主题表明,他们认为该活动内容丰富,适用于实际案例。此外,在研究期间,医院的 SEP-1 捆绑包的合规性从 71%(2021 年第一季度)提高到 80%(2023 年第三季度)。

结论

满足 SEP-1 捆绑要素需要一个包括提供者和护士的团队方法。鉴于医院繁忙的环境和多样化的护理提供者,一个与现实生活场景相关的、纵向的、引人入胜的和简洁的教育课程可以加强脓毒症和 SEP-1 教育。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b5f/11535707/d1a48da358d6/bmjoq-13-4-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b5f/11535707/bb5f4835da11/bmjoq-13-4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b5f/11535707/ae8645349b5f/bmjoq-13-4-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b5f/11535707/25c1282f179f/bmjoq-13-4-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b5f/11535707/a7c59e9b3d41/bmjoq-13-4-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b5f/11535707/d1a48da358d6/bmjoq-13-4-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b5f/11535707/bb5f4835da11/bmjoq-13-4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b5f/11535707/ae8645349b5f/bmjoq-13-4-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b5f/11535707/25c1282f179f/bmjoq-13-4-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b5f/11535707/a7c59e9b3d41/bmjoq-13-4-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b5f/11535707/d1a48da358d6/bmjoq-13-4-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Click and learn: a longitudinal interprofessional case-based sepsis education curriculum.点击学习:一项纵向的基于案例的多专业脓毒症教育课程。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Nov 2;13(4):e002859. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002859.
2
Educational needs assessment identifying opportunities to improve sepsis care.教育需求评估确定改善脓毒症护理的机会。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Dec;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001930.
3
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
4
Nurse Influence in Meeting Compliance With the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Quality Measure: Early Management Bundle, Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock (SEP-1).护士在促使符合医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心质量指标方面的影响:早期管理综合方案,严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克(SEP-1)
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2019 Mar/Apr;38(2):70-82. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000340.
5
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
6
7
Association of Registered Nurse Staffing With Mortality Risk of Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized With Sepsis.注册护士人员配备与因败血症住院的 Medicare 受益人的死亡率风险之间的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 May 27;3(5):e221173. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1173. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Preliminary Performance on the New CMS Sepsis-1 National Quality Measure: Early Insights From the Emergency Quality Network (E-QUAL).新型 CMS 脓毒症-1 国家质量指标的初步表现:来自急诊质量网络(E-QUAL)的早期见解。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;71(1):10-15.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.06.032. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
9
Compliance with SEP-1 guidelines is associated with improved outcomes for septic shock but not for severe sepsis.遵循SEP - 1指南与感染性休克患者预后改善相关,但与严重脓毒症患者的预后改善无关。
J Intensive Med. 2022 May 11;2(3):167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2022.03.003. eCollection 2022 Jul.
10
Association Between Implementation of the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle Performance Measure and Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期管理捆绑包实施与美国医院疑似脓毒症患者结局的相关性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2138596. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38596.

本文引用的文献

1
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
2
Effects of Compliance With the Early Management Bundle (SEP-1) on Mortality Changes Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Sepsis: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study.遵守早期管理包(SEP-1)对 Medicare 败血症受益人的死亡率变化的影响:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Chest. 2022 Feb;161(2):392-406. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.2167. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
3
Nurse Influence in Meeting Compliance With the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Quality Measure: Early Management Bundle, Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock (SEP-1).
护士在促使符合医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心质量指标方面的影响:早期管理综合方案,严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克(SEP-1)
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2019 Mar/Apr;38(2):70-82. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000340.
4
National Performance on the Medicare SEP-1 Sepsis Quality Measure.国家在 Medicare SEP-1 脓毒症质量测量上的表现。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;47(8):1026-1032. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003613.
5
Education in Sepsis: A Review for the Clinician of What Works, for Whom, and in What Circumstances.脓毒症教育:面向临床医生的综述,关于何种方法有效、对谁有效以及在何种情况下有效。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Sep;39(9):772-780. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.09.079. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
6
Effect of a multifaceted educational intervention for anti-infectious measures on sepsis mortality: a cluster randomized trial.多方面教育干预对抗感染措施对脓毒症死亡率的影响:一项集群随机试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1602-1612. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4782-4. Epub 2017 May 2.
7
Reducing the global burden of sepsis.减轻全球脓毒症负担。
CMAJ. 2017 Jan 9;189(1):E2-E3. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160798.
8
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
9
Sepsis: a roadmap for future research.脓毒症:未来研究的路线图。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 May;15(5):581-614. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70112-X. Epub 2015 Apr 19.