Centre for Human Performance, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Prevayl Ltd, Manchester, UK.
J Sports Sci. 2024 Nov;42(21):2012-2020. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2024.2421691. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
The study aimed to establish the test-retest reliability of detrended fluctuation analysis of heart rate variability (DFA-α1) based exercise intensity thresholds, assess its agreement with ventilatory- and lactate-derived thresholds and the moderating effect of sex and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) on the agreement. Intensity thresholds for thirty-seven participants (17 females) based on blood lactate (LT/LT), gas-exchange (VT/VT) and DFA-α1 (αTh/αTh) were assessed. Heart rate (HR) at αTh and αTh showed test-retest reliability (coefficient of variation [CV] < 6%), and to agreement with LTs ( = 0.40 - 0.57) and VTs ( = 0.61 - 0.66) respectively. Mixed effects models indicated bias magnitude depended on CRF, with DFA-α1 overestimating thresholds versus VTs for lower fitness levels (speed at VT <8.5 km⋅hr), while underestimating for higher fitness levels (speed at VT >15 km⋅hr; VO >55 mL·kg·min). Controlling for CRF, sex significantly affected bias magnitude only at first threshold, with males having higher mean bias (+2.41 bpm) than females (-1.26 bpm). DFA-α1 thresholds are practical and reliable intensity measures, however it is unclear if they accurately represent LTs/VTs from the observed limits of agreement and unexplained variance. To optimise DFA-α1 threshold estimation across different populations, bias should be corrected based on sex and CRF.
该研究旨在确定心率变异性去趋势波动分析(DFA-α1)的测试-重测信度,评估其与通气和乳酸衍生阈值的一致性,以及性别和心肺功能(CRF)对一致性的调节作用。根据血液乳酸(LT/LT)、气体交换(VT/VT)和 DFA-α1(αTh/αTh)评估了 37 名参与者(17 名女性)的强度阈值。αTh 和 αTh 的心率(HR)显示出测试-重测可靠性(变异系数 [CV] <6%),与 LT( = 0.40-0.57)和 VT( = 0.61-0.66)分别具有一致性。混合效应模型表明,偏差幅度取决于 CRF,与 VT 相比,DFA-α1 高估了较低的运动能力水平的阈值(VT 速度 <8.5 km·hr),而低估了较高的运动能力水平的阈值(VT 速度 >15 km·hr;VO >55 mL·kg·min)。控制 CRF 后,性别仅在第一阈值时显著影响偏差幅度,男性的平均偏差(+2.41 bpm)高于女性(-1.26 bpm)。DFA-α1 阈值是实用且可靠的强度测量指标,但是,从观察到的一致性和未解释方差的限制来看,DFA-α1 阈值是否能准确代表 LT/VT 尚不清楚。为了优化不同人群的 DFA-α1 阈值估计,应根据性别和 CRF 校正偏差。