Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
ENETS Center of Excellence, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Nov 2;150(11):485. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-06020-w.
Renal and hematological toxicity are side effects and dose-limiting factors of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT). We aimed to assess the changes in renal and hematological function and associations with survival in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients treated with PRRT.
A retrospective cohort of 448 NET patients treated with either Lu-DOTATATE or Y-DOTATOC were followed for changes of renal and hematological function. Renal function was assessed by monitoring changes in serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Hematological function was determined by examining changes in white blood cell counts (WBC), platelet counts, and hemoglobin levels over time. Piecewise linear mixed effect models were applied to model the longitudinal repeated measurements of renal and hematological function. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were modelled using Cox proportional hazard regressions.
Of the 448 PRRT treated patients, 335 received Lu-DOTATATE (74.78%) and 113 were treated with Y-DOTATOC (25.22%). Comparing patients treated with Lu-DOTATATE to those treated with Y-DOTATOC, renal function did not differ significantly prior to, during or after PRRT. Compared with patients treated with Y-DOTATOC, significantly decreased indicators of hematological function were observed in those treated with Lu-DOTATATE prior to and during PRRT treatment (WBC: estimate, -0.10, 95% CI, -0.15 to -0.05; P < 0.001; platelet count: estimate, -2.53, 95% CI, -3.83 to -1.24; P < 0.001), and no significant recovery was observed in hematological function post PRRT. Individuals who received Lu-DOTATATE tended to have a longer PFS (hazard ratio, 0.47, 95%CI: 0.28-0.79, P = 0.004) compared with Y-DOTATOC, but there was no difference in OS.
There was no significant renal, but minor hematological toxicity, in patients treated with Lu-DOTATATE compared with Y-DOTATOC. Compared to Y-DOTATOC, Lu-DOTATATE appears to enhance PFS, but not OS. Treatment with Lu-DOTATATE may necessitate follow-up for hematological toxicity irrespective of other therapies prior to PRRT.
肾和血液学毒性是肽受体放射性核素治疗(PRRT)的副作用和剂量限制因素。我们旨在评估在接受 PRRT 治疗的神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)患者中,肾功能和血液功能的变化及其与生存的关系。
对 448 例接受 Lu-DOTATATE 或 Y-DOTATOC 治疗的 NET 患者进行回顾性队列研究,观察肾功能和血液功能的变化。通过监测血清肌酐、血尿素氮和估计肾小球滤过率的变化来评估肾功能。通过随时间检查白细胞计数(WBC)、血小板计数和血红蛋白水平的变化来确定血液功能。应用分段线性混合效应模型对肾功能和血液功能的纵向重复测量进行建模。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型对总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)进行建模。
在接受 PRRT 治疗的 448 例患者中,335 例接受 Lu-DOTATATE(74.78%)治疗,113 例接受 Y-DOTATOC(25.22%)治疗。与接受 Lu-DOTATATE 治疗的患者相比,接受 Y-DOTATOC 治疗的患者在 PRRT 治疗前、治疗中和治疗后肾功能无显著差异。与接受 Y-DOTATOC 治疗的患者相比,接受 Lu-DOTATATE 治疗的患者在 PRRT 治疗前和治疗期间观察到血液功能明显下降的指标(WBC:估计值,-0.10,95%CI,-0.15 至-0.05;P<0.001;血小板计数:估计值,-2.53,95%CI,-3.83 至-1.24;P<0.001),而 PRRT 后血液功能无明显恢复。与 Y-DOTATOC 相比,接受 Lu-DOTATATE 治疗的患者 PFS 更长(风险比,0.47,95%CI:0.28-0.79,P=0.004),但 OS 无差异。
与 Y-DOTATOC 相比,接受 Lu-DOTATATE 治疗的患者肾毒性无显著差异,但血液毒性较小。与 Y-DOTATOC 相比,Lu-DOTATATE 似乎可提高 PFS,但不提高 OS。接受 Lu-DOTATATE 治疗后,无论 PRRT 前是否接受其他治疗,均需随访血液毒性。