Xu Haojie, Cao Jiaming, Zhang Hongyi, Fei Fenglong, Tang Dongming, Liu Donghua, Luo Dongbin
Guangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510800, China.
Guangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Guangzhou, 510800, China.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Mar;57(3):957-963. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04263-7. Epub 2024 Nov 3.
This study aims to evaluate the reporting risk of renal injury associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), with a particular focus on the reporting risk levels and onset times of different NSAIDs.
A pharmacovigilance study was conducted using data from the FAERS database from January 2004 to December 2023. Reports of renal injury were identified, and signal detection was performed using reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) methods. The study compared the incidence, mortality rates, and onset times of renal injury across five NSAIDs.
Among the 7436 cases of NSAID-associated renal injury analyzed, elderly patients are at an increased risk of renal injury associated with NSAID usage. Ibuprofen had the highest number of reports (3475 cases, 46.7%), while celecoxib had the lowest (542 cases, 7.3%). Ibuprofen showed the highest signal with renal injury (ROR 3.3, IC025 1.7), whereas celecoxib exhibited the lowest (ROR 1.4, IC025 0.4). Aspirin had the highest mortality rate associated with renal injury (18.7%), while ibuprofen had the lowest (3.8%). The median onset time for renal injury was 6 days, with 79.3% of adverse events occurring within the first 30 days of use.
The study indicates that ibuprofen presents the highest signal of renal injury, while celecoxib shows the lowest signal. The likelihood of NSAID-associated renal injury is heightened in elderly patients, and all five studied NSAIDs are linked to an increased likelihood of acute renal injury. NSAID-related renal damage tends to occur early in the treatment process, potentially leading to serious consequences. Due to the inherent limitations of pharmacovigilance studies, certain findings require additional validation like cohort studies. Nonetheless, the potential for an increased risk of renal injury must be taken into account in patient care.
本研究旨在评估非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)相关肾损伤的报告风险,特别关注不同NSAIDs的报告风险水平和发病时间。
利用2004年1月至2023年12月FAERS数据库的数据进行药物警戒研究。识别肾损伤报告,并使用报告比值比(ROR)和贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)方法进行信号检测。该研究比较了五种NSAIDs的肾损伤发病率、死亡率和发病时间。
在分析的7436例NSAID相关肾损伤病例中,老年患者使用NSAIDs导致肾损伤的风险增加。布洛芬的报告数量最多(3475例,46.7%),而塞来昔布的报告数量最少(542例,7.3%)。布洛芬显示出与肾损伤相关的最高信号(ROR 3.3,IC025 1.7),而塞来昔布的信号最低(ROR 1.4,IC025 0.4)。阿司匹林与肾损伤相关的死亡率最高(18.7%),而布洛芬的死亡率最低(3.8%)。肾损伤的中位发病时间为6天,79.3%的不良事件发生在使用的前30天内。
该研究表明,布洛芬呈现出肾损伤的最高信号,而塞来昔布的信号最低。老年患者发生NSAID相关肾损伤的可能性增加,并且所有五种研究的NSAIDs都与急性肾损伤可能性增加有关。NSAID相关的肾损害往往在治疗过程早期发生,可能导致严重后果。由于药物警戒研究的固有局限性,某些发现需要像队列研究这样的额外验证。尽管如此,在患者护理中必须考虑到肾损伤风险增加的可能性。