Bronk Julianna K, Augustyn Alexander, Mohamed Abdallah S R, David Fuller C, Garden Adam S, Moreno Amy C, Lee Anna, Morrison William H, Phan Jack, Reddy Jay P, Rosenthal David I, Spiotto Michael T, Frank Steven J, Dadu Ramona, Busaidy Naifa, Zafereo Mark, Wang Jennifer R, Maniakas Anastasios, Ferrarotto Renata, Iyer Priyanka C, Cabanillas Maria E, Gunn G Brandon
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States; Community Health Network Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Radiother Oncol. 2025 Jan;202:110602. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110602. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
The aim of this study is to characterize the patterns of loco-regional progression (LRP) and outcomes after definitive-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) with macroscopic neck disease at the time of IMRT.
Disease/treatment characteristics and outcomes for patients with unresected or incompletely resected ATC who received IMRT (≥45 Gy) were retrospectively reviewed. For those with LRP after IMRT, progressive/recurrent gross tumor volumes (rGTV) were contoured on diagnostic CTs and co-registered with initial planning CTs using deformable image registration. rGTVs were classified based on established spatial/dosimetric criteria.
Forty patients treated between 2010-2020 formed the cohort. Median IMRT dose was 66 Gy (45-70 Gy); altered fractionation (AF) was used in 24 (60 %). All received concurrent chemotherapy. In addition to areas of gross disease, target volumes (TVs) commonly included: central compartment/upper mediastinum (levels VI/VII), neck levels II-V in an involved, and levels III-IV in an uninvolved lateral neck. Median overall survival was 7.1 m. Median progression free survival was 7.4 m for patients with locoregional disease and 1.8 m for patients with distant metastasis at the time of IMRT. Twenty-one patients (53 %) developed LRP at median of 10.9 m; freedom from LRP at 3 m and 12 m was 71 % (95 %CI 58-87 %) and 47 % (95 %CI 32-68 %). Forty-one individual rGTVs were identified and most occurred within the high dose (HD) TVs: Type A/central HD (n = 29, 71 %) and B/peripheral HD (n = 3, 7 %).
Despite an intensive treatment schedule, including AF and concurrent chemotherapy, classic radio-resistant and rapid Type A failures predominated; isolated extraneous dose failures were rare. While these findings support the IMRT and TV delineation strategies described herein, they highlight the importance of identifying novel strategies to further improve LRC for patients with unresectable disease without targetable mutations for contemporary neo-adjuvant strategies.
本研究旨在描述在调强放射治疗(IMRT)时伴有颈部肉眼可见病变的间变性甲状腺癌(ATC)患者进行根治性剂量IMRT后的局部区域进展(LRP)模式及预后。
对接受IMRT(≥45 Gy)的未切除或未完全切除的ATC患者的疾病/治疗特征及预后进行回顾性分析。对于IMRT后发生LRP的患者,在诊断性CT上勾勒出进展期/复发性大体肿瘤体积(rGTV),并使用可变形图像配准与初始计划CT进行配准。根据既定的空间/剂量标准对rGTV进行分类。
2010年至2020年间治疗的40例患者组成了该队列。IMRT的中位剂量为66 Gy(45 - 70 Gy);24例(60%)采用了改变分割(AF)。所有患者均接受了同步化疗。除大体病变区域外,靶区(TV)通常包括:中央区/上纵隔(Ⅵ/Ⅶ区)、受累侧颈部的Ⅱ - V区以及未受累侧颈部的Ⅲ - Ⅳ区。中位总生存期为7.1个月。IMRT时局部区域疾病患者的中位无进展生存期为7.4个月,远处转移患者为1.8个月。21例患者(53%)在中位时间10.9个月时发生LRP;3个月和12个月时无LRP的比例分别为71%(95%CI 58 - 87%)和47%(95%CI 32 - 68%)。共识别出41个独立的rGTV,大多数发生在高剂量(HD)TV内:A型/中央HD(n = 29,71%)和B型/外周HD(n = 3,7%)。
尽管采用了包括AF和同步化疗在内的强化治疗方案,但经典的放射抵抗性快速A型失败仍占主导;孤立的额外剂量失败很少见。虽然这些发现支持本文所述的IMRT和TV勾画策略,但它们凸显了识别新策略以进一步改善不可切除且无当代新辅助策略可靶向突变患者的局部区域控制(LRC)的重要性。