• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿各阶段手动淋巴引流压力水平的定量分析:对优化治疗方案的启示

Quantitative analysis of pressure levels in manual lymphatic drainage across stages of breast cancer-related lymphedema: implications for optimized treatment protocols.

作者信息

Xing Naifang, Liu Daiqing, Chen Lufeng, Wang Guorong, Tian Yuan, Yang Chen, Leng Yingjie, Jiang Xin, Li Chengxiang, Xie Ruonan, Nie Zhuomiao, Zhang Tian

机构信息

School of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 611137, China.

School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, China.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Feb;210(1):95-103. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07540-2. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-024-07540-2
PMID:39489842
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the pressure levels necessary for effective Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD) in managing Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) across various stages, and to contribute to the development of standardized protocols for MLD therapy.

METHODS

The study included 42 patients with BCRL (Stages I-III) and 14 certified lymphedema therapists. Forearms and upper arm circumferences were measured pre and post a 21-day MLD intervention. A tactile sensor system recorded the applied pressure during treatment. The data were preprocessed and statistically analyzed to assess pressure patterns and their stage-specific impacts on lymphedema.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 52.4 years, and that of the therapists was 39.1 years. A statistically significant reduction in arm circumference was observed post-MLD treatment (P < 0.05). The pressure applied varied across stages: I 16.5-20.1 mmHg, I 16.1-20.7 mmHg; II 16.6-19.8 mmHg, II 19.7-23.8 mmHg; III 29.3-34.3 mmHg, III 29.7-34.3 mmHg. No statistically significant difference was found between forearm and upper arm treatment pressures within Stages I (P = 0.283) and III (P = 0.08), while Stage II exhibited a significant difference (P < 0.001). Across the same treatment area, pressures for Stages I and II in the forearm were significantly lower than those in Stage III (P < 0.001). The treatment pressure differences between forearm stages I and II were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Differences in upper arm treatment pressures across Stages I, II, and III were also statistically significant (P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

The study provides quantitative evidence on the pressure ranges needed for MLD across different stages of BCRL. It highlights the importance for stage-specific pressure adjustments to optimize treatment outcomes. These findings contribute to the existing body of knowledge on MLD and offer valuable data that could inform the development of rehabilitation technologies, including intelligent robots and visualization systems, as well as enhance therapist training programs.

摘要

目的

量化在不同阶段管理乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)时有效进行手动淋巴引流(MLD)所需的压力水平,并为MLD治疗标准化方案的制定做出贡献。

方法

该研究纳入了42例BCRL患者(I - III期)和14名认证淋巴水肿治疗师。在为期21天的MLD干预前后测量前臂和上臂周长。触觉传感器系统记录治疗期间施加的压力。对数据进行预处理和统计分析,以评估压力模式及其对淋巴水肿的阶段特异性影响。

结果

患者的平均年龄为52.4岁,治疗师的平均年龄为39.1岁。MLD治疗后观察到手臂周长有统计学意义的减小(P < 0.05)。不同阶段施加的压力有所不同:I期16.5 - 20.1 mmHg,I期16.1 - 20.7 mmHg;II期16.6 - 19.8 mmHg,II期19.7 - 23.8 mmHg;III期29.3 - 34.3 mmHg,III期29.7 - 34.3 mmHg。在I期(P = 0.283)和III期(P = 0.08),前臂和上臂治疗压力之间未发现统计学显著差异,而II期表现出显著差异(P < 0.001)。在相同治疗区域,前臂I期和II期的压力显著低于III期(P < 0.001)。前臂I期和II期之间的治疗压力差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。上臂I、II、III期治疗压力的差异也具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。

讨论

该研究提供了关于BCRL不同阶段MLD所需压力范围的定量证据。它强调了针对特定阶段进行压力调整以优化治疗效果的重要性。这些发现为现有的MLD知识体系做出了贡献,并提供了有价值的数据,可为康复技术的发展提供参考,包括智能机器人和可视化系统,以及加强治疗师培训项目。

相似文献

1
Quantitative analysis of pressure levels in manual lymphatic drainage across stages of breast cancer-related lymphedema: implications for optimized treatment protocols.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿各阶段手动淋巴引流压力水平的定量分析:对优化治疗方案的启示
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Feb;210(1):95-103. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07540-2. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
2
Does Manual Lymphatic Drainage Add Value in Reducing Suprafascial Fluid Accumulation and Skin Elasticity in Patients With Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema?手法淋巴引流是否有助于减少乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿患者的皮下积液和皮肤弹性?
Phys Ther. 2022 Dec 6;102(12). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac137.
3
Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema following breast cancer treatment.乳腺癌治疗后淋巴水肿的手法淋巴引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 21;2015(5):CD003475. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003475.pub2.
4
Effect of Manual Lymphatic Drainage on Breast Cancer-Related Postmastectomy Lymphedema: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.手法淋巴引流对乳腺癌改良根治术后淋巴水肿的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Cancer Nurs. 2023;46(2):159-166. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001061. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
5
Bilateral Changes in Deep Tissue Environment After Manual Lymphatic Drainage in Patients with Breast Cancer Treatment-Related Lymphedema.乳腺癌治疗相关淋巴水肿患者接受手法淋巴引流后深部组织环境的双侧变化
Lymphat Res Biol. 2017 Mar;15(1):45-56. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2016.0020.
6
Protocol of a randomised controlled trial regarding the effectiveness of fluoroscopy-guided manual lymph drainage for the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphoedema (EFforT-BCRL trial).关于荧光透视引导下手法淋巴引流治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿有效性的随机对照试验方案(EFforT-BCRL试验)
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Feb;221:177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.12.023. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
7
Manual Lymphatic Drainage for Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.手动淋巴引流治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Jul;22(5):e664-e673. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
8
Effectiveness of manual lymphatic drainage in intensive phase I therapy of breast cancer-related lymphedema-a retrospective analysis.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿强化 I 期治疗中手法淋巴引流的效果:回顾性分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Dec 5;32(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08210-7.
9
Manual lymphatic drainage for breast cancer-related lymphoedema.用于乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的手法淋巴引流
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Sep;26(5). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12517. Epub 2016 May 11.
10
Advances in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的防治进展。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jul;200(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06947-7. Epub 2023 Apr 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnosis and Treatments of Limb Lymphedema: Review.肢体淋巴水肿的诊断与治疗:综述
Ann Vasc Dis. 2024 Jun 25;17(2):114-119. doi: 10.3400/avd.ra.24-00011. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
Therapist versus Machine-Immediate Effects of Manual versus Mechanical Lymphatic Drainage in Patients with Secondary Lymphedema.治疗师与机器——继发性淋巴水肿患者手法与机械性淋巴引流的即时效果
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 23;13(5):1277. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051277.
3
Various Therapies for Lymphedema and Chronic Venous Insufficiency, Including a Multimodal At-Home Nonpneumatic Compression Treatment.
各种淋巴水肿和慢性静脉功能不全的治疗方法,包括一种多模式家庭非气动压迫治疗。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2024 Apr 1;37(4):212-215. doi: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000091. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
4
Manual Lymphatic Drainage Increases the Number of Opened Lymphatic Pathways in Patients with Lower Limb Lymphedemas: A Sequential Research on 80 Patients.手法淋巴引流增加下肢淋巴水肿患者开放的淋巴通路数量:对80例患者的系列研究
Lymphology. 2022;55(4):155-166.
5
Early Disturbance of Lymphatic Transport as a Risk Factor for the Development of Breast-Cancer-Related Lymphedema.淋巴转运早期紊乱作为乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿发生的危险因素
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 15;15(6):1774. doi: 10.3390/cancers15061774.
6
Guidelines Relevant to Diagnosis, Assessment, and Management of Lymphedema: A Systematic Review.《淋巴水肿诊断、评估和管理相关指南:系统评价》。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2023 Jan;12(1):15-27. doi: 10.1089/wound.2021.0149. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
7
Possibility of new lymphatic pathway creation through neo-lymphangiogenesis induced by subdermal dissection.通过皮下剥离诱导新生淋巴管生成来创建新淋巴通路的可能性。
Lymphology. 2021;54(3):154-163.
8
Manual Lymphedema Drainage for Reducing Risk for and Managing Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema After Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review.手动淋巴引流术降低乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿风险和管理的系统评价。
Nurs Womens Health. 2021 Oct;25(5):377-383. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
9
The use of manual lymphatic drainage on clinical presentation of musculoskeletal injuries: A systematic review.手法淋巴引流在肌肉骨骼损伤临床表现中的应用:系统评价。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;45:101469. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101469. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
10
Investigation of the Less Known Effects of Manual Lymphatic Drainage: A Narrative Review.手法淋巴引流鲜为人知的作用研究:一项叙述性综述
Lymphat Res Biol. 2022 Feb;20(1):7-10. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2019.0091. Epub 2021 Mar 22.