• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗器械无机金属浸出物和可提取物分析的分析评价阈值。

The analytical evaluation threshold for inorganic metal extractables and leachables analysis of medical devices.

机构信息

Medtronic Plc, Minneaplis, MN, USA.

Medtronic Plc, Minneaplis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2024 Dec;154:105725. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105725. Epub 2024 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105725
PMID:39490559
Abstract

Chemical characterization of medical devices uses the analytical evaluation threshold (AET) to determine reportable organic extractables, as these chemicals may be of toxicological concern and should be addressed via toxicological risk assessment. The AET is not applicable to metal extractables due to the exclusion of toxicity data on inorganics from the dataset used to derive dose-based threshold (DBT) values. This results in minimal guidance for reporting metal extractables. Herein, an AET for metals, or mAET, is proposed as a reporting threshold for individual metal extractables. The mAET can ensure metals are reported that are at quantities that may present a patient safety risk. This may reduce the number of metals reported in a chemical characterization report, improving the efficiency of the overall biocompatibility evaluation by removing unneeded effort and resource time. Conversely, an analytical method's ability to report all metals at toxicologically relevant levels can be confirmed by comparing method sensitivity to mAET values. DBTs were developed for 70 metals, permitting mAET values to be determined. These mAET values were then compared to metal reporting limits from 13 previously conducted chemical characterization studies, which used varying extraction designs and analytical methods, to determine the impact of the mAET.

摘要

医疗器械的化学特性使用分析评估阈值(AET)来确定需要报告的有机浸出物,因为这些化学物质可能具有毒理学意义,应该通过毒理学风险评估来解决。由于用于推导基于剂量的阈值(DBT)值的数据集中排除了无机物的毒性数据,因此 AET 不适用于金属浸出物。这导致对金属浸出物的报告几乎没有指导。本文提出了金属的 AET(mAET),作为金属浸出物的报告阈值。mAET 可以确保报告那些可能存在患者安全风险的金属数量。这可能会减少化学特性描述报告中报告的金属数量,通过消除不必要的工作和资源时间,提高整体生物相容性评估的效率。相反,通过比较方法的灵敏度与 mAET 值,可以确认分析方法报告所有具有毒理学意义的金属的能力。为 70 种金属制定了 DBT,允许确定 mAET 值。然后,将这些 mAET 值与之前进行的 13 项化学特性描述研究中的金属报告限值进行比较,以确定 mAET 的影响。

相似文献

1
The analytical evaluation threshold for inorganic metal extractables and leachables analysis of medical devices.医疗器械无机金属浸出物和可提取物分析的分析评价阈值。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2024 Dec;154:105725. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105725. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
2
Addressing Medical Device Extractables and Leachables via Non-Target Analysis (NTA); The Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) and Quantitation.通过非靶向分析(NTA)解决医疗器械可提取物和可沥滤物问题;分析评估阈值(AET)与定量
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2025 Mar 3;79(1):98-113. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2024.012945.
3
A compilation of safety impact information for extractables associated with materials used in pharmaceutical packaging, delivery, administration, and manufacturing systems.一份与药品包装、给药、管理及生产系统中所用材料相关的可提取物安全性影响信息汇编。
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2014 Sep-Oct;68(5):407-55. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2014.00995.
4
Reducing relative response factor variation using a multidetector approach for extractables and leachables (E&L) analysis to mitigate the need for uncertainty factors.采用多检测器方法减少提取和浸出物(E&L)分析中的相对响应因子变化,以减少不确定性因素的需要。
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020 Jul 15;186:113334. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113334. Epub 2020 May 1.
5
A Practical Derivation of the Uncertainty Factor Applied to Adjust the Extractables/Leachables Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) for Response Factor Variation.应用不确定度因子对提取/浸出物分析评估阈值(AET)进行调整以应对响应因子变化的实用推导。
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2022 May-Jun;76(3):178-199. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2021.012692. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
6
How sensitive does chemical characterization of medical devices need to be? Calibration of analytical evaluation thresholds with the carcinogenic potency database.医疗器械的化学特征分析需要达到多高的灵敏度?利用致癌效力数据库对分析评估阈值进行校准。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Jun;122:104899. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104899. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
7
An Analytical Strategy Based on Multiple Complementary and Orthogonal Chromatographic and Detection Methods (Multidetector Approach) to Effectively Manage the Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET).一种基于多种互补和正交色谱及检测方法的分析策略(多检测器方法),以有效管理分析评估阈值(AET)。
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2021 May-Jun;75(3):289-301. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2020.012047. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
8
Perspectives on the PQRI Extractables and Leachables "Safety Thresholds and Best Practices" Recommendations for Inhalation Drug Products.吸入药品的PQRI可提取物和浸出物“安全阈值及最佳实践”建议的观点
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2013 Sep-Oct;67(5):413-29. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2013.00934.
9
Creating a Holistic Extractables and Leachables (E&L) Program for Biotechnology Products.为生物科技产品创建一个全面的可提取物和可浸出物(E&L)计划。
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2015 Sep-Oct;69(5):590-619. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2015.01073.
10
Standardization of Chromatographic Screening Methods for Organic Extractables and Leachables by Managing Outcomes.通过管理结果实现有机可提取物和可沥滤物色谱筛选方法的标准化。
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2023 Jul-Aug;77(4):329-338. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2021.012671. Epub 2023 Mar 31.