Medtronic Plc, Minneaplis, MN, USA.
Medtronic Plc, Minneaplis, MN, USA.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2024 Dec;154:105725. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105725. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
Chemical characterization of medical devices uses the analytical evaluation threshold (AET) to determine reportable organic extractables, as these chemicals may be of toxicological concern and should be addressed via toxicological risk assessment. The AET is not applicable to metal extractables due to the exclusion of toxicity data on inorganics from the dataset used to derive dose-based threshold (DBT) values. This results in minimal guidance for reporting metal extractables. Herein, an AET for metals, or mAET, is proposed as a reporting threshold for individual metal extractables. The mAET can ensure metals are reported that are at quantities that may present a patient safety risk. This may reduce the number of metals reported in a chemical characterization report, improving the efficiency of the overall biocompatibility evaluation by removing unneeded effort and resource time. Conversely, an analytical method's ability to report all metals at toxicologically relevant levels can be confirmed by comparing method sensitivity to mAET values. DBTs were developed for 70 metals, permitting mAET values to be determined. These mAET values were then compared to metal reporting limits from 13 previously conducted chemical characterization studies, which used varying extraction designs and analytical methods, to determine the impact of the mAET.
医疗器械的化学特性使用分析评估阈值(AET)来确定需要报告的有机浸出物,因为这些化学物质可能具有毒理学意义,应该通过毒理学风险评估来解决。由于用于推导基于剂量的阈值(DBT)值的数据集中排除了无机物的毒性数据,因此 AET 不适用于金属浸出物。这导致对金属浸出物的报告几乎没有指导。本文提出了金属的 AET(mAET),作为金属浸出物的报告阈值。mAET 可以确保报告那些可能存在患者安全风险的金属数量。这可能会减少化学特性描述报告中报告的金属数量,通过消除不必要的工作和资源时间,提高整体生物相容性评估的效率。相反,通过比较方法的灵敏度与 mAET 值,可以确认分析方法报告所有具有毒理学意义的金属的能力。为 70 种金属制定了 DBT,允许确定 mAET 值。然后,将这些 mAET 值与之前进行的 13 项化学特性描述研究中的金属报告限值进行比较,以确定 mAET 的影响。