• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过非靶向分析(NTA)解决医疗器械可提取物和可沥滤物问题;分析评估阈值(AET)与定量

Addressing Medical Device Extractables and Leachables via Non-Target Analysis (NTA); The Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) and Quantitation.

作者信息

Jenke Dennis, Christiaens Piet, Heise Ted

机构信息

Triad Scientific Solutions, LLC, Hawthorn Woods, IL;

Nelson Labs, Europe; and.

出版信息

PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2025 Mar 3;79(1):98-113. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2024.012945.

DOI:10.5731/pdajpst.2024.012945
PMID:39730201
Abstract

Substances leached from a medical device during its clinical use are important due to the patient health-related effects they may have. Thus, medical devices are profiled for leachables (and/or extractables as probable leachables) by screening extracts or leachates of the medical device for released organic substances via a non-target analysis (NTA) employing chromatographic methods coupled with mass spectrometric detection. Chromatographic mass spectral response factors for extractables and leachables vary significantly from compound to compound, complicating the application of assessment strategies such as the analytical evaluation threshold (AET), which is the concentration threshold at or above which an extractable or leachable must be reported for quantitative toxicological risk assessment. The analytical uncertainty resulting from response variation can make interpretation of the AET difficult, potentially leading to both false positive and false negative outcomes. Furthermore, response factor variation complicates the estimation of leachables' and extractables' concentrations (quantification). This Correspondence discusses practices for the calculation and application of the AET and for performing quantification, including a discussion of accuracy versus protectiveness.

摘要

医疗器械在临床使用过程中浸出的物质很重要,因为它们可能会对患者健康产生影响。因此,通过采用色谱方法与质谱检测相结合的非靶向分析(NTA),对医疗器械的提取物或浸出液进行筛选,以检测释放的有机物质,从而对医疗器械的可浸出物(和/或作为可能可浸出物的可提取物)进行分析。可提取物和可浸出物的色谱质谱响应因子因化合物而异,这使得诸如分析评估阈值(AET)等评估策略的应用变得复杂,分析评估阈值是指在定量毒理学风险评估中必须报告可提取物或可浸出物的浓度阈值。响应变化导致的分析不确定性会使对AET的解释变得困难,可能导致假阳性和假阴性结果。此外,响应因子的变化使可浸出物和可提取物浓度的估算(定量)变得复杂。本信函讨论了AET的计算和应用以及进行定量的实践,包括对准确性与保护性的讨论。

相似文献

1
Addressing Medical Device Extractables and Leachables via Non-Target Analysis (NTA); The Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) and Quantitation.通过非靶向分析(NTA)解决医疗器械可提取物和可沥滤物问题;分析评估阈值(AET)与定量
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2025 Mar 3;79(1):98-113. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2024.012945.
2
Identification and quantification of medical device extractables and leachables via non-target analysis (NTA); Analytical uncertainty.通过非靶向分析(NTA)鉴定和量化医疗器械浸出物和可提取物;分析不确定度。
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2024 Apr 15;241:115985. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2024.115985. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
3
Reducing relative response factor variation using a multidetector approach for extractables and leachables (E&L) analysis to mitigate the need for uncertainty factors.采用多检测器方法减少提取和浸出物(E&L)分析中的相对响应因子变化,以减少不确定性因素的需要。
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020 Jul 15;186:113334. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113334. Epub 2020 May 1.
4
An Analytical Strategy Based on Multiple Complementary and Orthogonal Chromatographic and Detection Methods (Multidetector Approach) to Effectively Manage the Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET).一种基于多种互补和正交色谱及检测方法的分析策略(多检测器方法),以有效管理分析评估阈值(AET)。
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2021 May-Jun;75(3):289-301. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2020.012047. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
5
The Implications of Chromatographically Screening Medical Products for Organic Leachables Down to the Analytical Evaluation Threshold Adjusted for Response Factor Variation.对色谱筛选医疗产品中的有机可浸出物进行分析评估时,需将响应因子变化引起的分析评估检测限调整至检测下限以下。
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2021 May-Jun;75(3):273-288. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2020.012013. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
6
Correcting the Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) and Reported Extractable's Concentrations for Analytical Response Factor Uncertainty Associated with Chromatographic Screening for Extractables/Leachables.校正分析评估阈值 (AET) 和报告的可提取物浓度,以解决与色谱筛选提取物/浸出物相关的分析响应因子不确定性。
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2020 May-Jun;74(3):348-358. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2019.010520. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
7
The analytical evaluation threshold for inorganic metal extractables and leachables analysis of medical devices.医疗器械无机金属浸出物和可提取物分析的分析评价阈值。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2024 Dec;154:105725. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105725. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
8
Standardization of Chromatographic Screening Methods for Organic Extractables and Leachables by Managing Outcomes.通过管理结果实现有机可提取物和可沥滤物色谱筛选方法的标准化。
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2023 Jul-Aug;77(4):329-338. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2021.012671. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
9
A Practical Derivation of the Uncertainty Factor Applied to Adjust the Extractables/Leachables Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) for Response Factor Variation.应用不确定度因子对提取/浸出物分析评估阈值(AET)进行调整以应对响应因子变化的实用推导。
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2022 May-Jun;76(3):178-199. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2021.012692. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
10
Identifying and Mitigating Errors in Screening for Organic Extractables and Leachables: Part 1-Introduction to Errors in Chromatographic Screening for Organic Extractables and Leachables and Discussion of the Errors of Omission.识别和减轻有机浸出物和可提取物筛选中的错误:第 1 部分-色谱筛选有机浸出物和可提取物中的错误简介以及对遗漏错误的讨论。
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2020 Jan-Feb;74(1):90-107. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2018.009761. Epub 2019 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Practical Considerations of FDA's CLAP List to Support Testing of Extractables for Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)《可提取物清单》(CLAP)对支持药品和医疗器械可提取物测试的实际考量
ACS Omega. 2025 May 14;10(20):20801-20816. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c01982. eCollection 2025 May 27.