Jenke Dennis, Christiaens Piet, Heise Ted
Triad Scientific Solutions, LLC, Hawthorn Woods, IL;
Nelson Labs, Europe; and.
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2025 Mar 3;79(1):98-113. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2024.012945.
Substances leached from a medical device during its clinical use are important due to the patient health-related effects they may have. Thus, medical devices are profiled for leachables (and/or extractables as probable leachables) by screening extracts or leachates of the medical device for released organic substances via a non-target analysis (NTA) employing chromatographic methods coupled with mass spectrometric detection. Chromatographic mass spectral response factors for extractables and leachables vary significantly from compound to compound, complicating the application of assessment strategies such as the analytical evaluation threshold (AET), which is the concentration threshold at or above which an extractable or leachable must be reported for quantitative toxicological risk assessment. The analytical uncertainty resulting from response variation can make interpretation of the AET difficult, potentially leading to both false positive and false negative outcomes. Furthermore, response factor variation complicates the estimation of leachables' and extractables' concentrations (quantification). This Correspondence discusses practices for the calculation and application of the AET and for performing quantification, including a discussion of accuracy versus protectiveness.
医疗器械在临床使用过程中浸出的物质很重要,因为它们可能会对患者健康产生影响。因此,通过采用色谱方法与质谱检测相结合的非靶向分析(NTA),对医疗器械的提取物或浸出液进行筛选,以检测释放的有机物质,从而对医疗器械的可浸出物(和/或作为可能可浸出物的可提取物)进行分析。可提取物和可浸出物的色谱质谱响应因子因化合物而异,这使得诸如分析评估阈值(AET)等评估策略的应用变得复杂,分析评估阈值是指在定量毒理学风险评估中必须报告可提取物或可浸出物的浓度阈值。响应变化导致的分析不确定性会使对AET的解释变得困难,可能导致假阳性和假阴性结果。此外,响应因子的变化使可浸出物和可提取物浓度的估算(定量)变得复杂。本信函讨论了AET的计算和应用以及进行定量的实践,包括对准确性与保护性的讨论。