Burn Martina S, Kwah Jason H, Son Moeun
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Section of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Mar;232(3):243-261. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.10.025. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
Drug allergies, specifically antibiotic allergies, are frequently encountered in obstetrics and gynecology, with 10% of the US population reporting a penicillin allergy. This poses a particular challenge to the obstetrician-gynecologist, as beta-lactam antibiotics are indicated as first-line therapy for the treatment and prevention of most specialty-specific infections. Alternative antibiotic use in the setting of a reported allergy is not benign and has been associated with increased cesarean delivery, endometritis, wound complication, length of hospital stay in pregnant patients, Group B Streptococcus sepsis, neonatal length of stay, neonatal laboratory draw in neonates born to patients with allergies, and surgical site infection in gynecologic patients. Furthermore, alternative antibiotic use leads to increased antibiotic resistance, toxicity, and healthcare cost. In addition, the administration of antibiotics in a patient with a history of type I immediate hypersensitivity reaction poses a risk of anaphylaxis with repeat exposure. Fortunately, >90% of patients who report a penicillin allergy are not truly allergic and would tolerate penicillins if administered. This can be due to either mislabeling of the index reaction as an allergy (when it was due to a drug intolerance or a viral exanthem) or waning immunoglobulin E-mediated immunity over time. Given this, allergy evaluation is widely recommended, even in pregnancy. Allergy evaluation involves detailed patient history and allergy testing with skin testing and/or oral challenge, as appropriate. These tools have been found to be safe and effective in gravid and nongravid individuals and to result in increased use of first-line antibiotics when used appropriately. Furthermore, even in the setting of a true penicillin allergy, cross-reactivity with cephalosporins is extremely low and estimated at 2% to 3% among patients with a verified penicillin allergy and considerably lower than this among patients with an unverified penicillin allergy. Guidelines support the routine use of cephalosporins without testing or additional precautions in patients with an unverified nonanaphylactic penicillin allergy and the routine use of structurally dissimilar cephalosporins (specifically Ancef) even in patients with an anaphylactic penicillin allergy. In cases in which there is no appropriate alternative antibiotic than that for which the patient is allergic, such as syphilis in a pregnant patient with penicillin allergy, desensitization can be performed. This process involves temporary induction of drug tolerance through exposure to small amounts of the allergen until a therapeutic dose is achieved and has been safely performed in pregnancy. Desensitization requires expert supervision and is most often performed in the intensive care setting with a multidisciplinary team. The other 2 most common antibiotic allergies encountered in the field of obstetrics and gynecology are cephalosporin and metronidazole allergies. Cephalosporin allergies are managed similarly to penicillin allergies with readily available skin testing and oral challenge. Skin testing for metronidazole allergy lacks sensitivity and specificity, and thus, oral challenge or desensitization procedure is the preferred approach for low-risk and high-risk patients, respectively. When it comes to drug allergies, specifically antibiotic allergies, the role of the obstetrician-gynecologist is to identify patients with reported allergies and to refer patients to a specialist for further evaluation as soon as possible. Allergy evaluation using a detailed patient history and allergy testing (skin testing and/or oral challenge) when indicated has been shown to be safe and effective and is an important part of antibiotic stewardship.
药物过敏,尤其是抗生素过敏,在妇产科中经常遇到,美国有10%的人口报告对青霉素过敏。这给妇产科医生带来了特殊挑战,因为β-内酰胺类抗生素被用作治疗和预防大多数专科特定感染的一线疗法。在报告有过敏反应的情况下使用替代抗生素并非无害,且与剖宫产率增加、子宫内膜炎、伤口并发症、孕妇住院时间延长、B族链球菌败血症、新生儿住院时间、过敏患者所生新生儿的新生儿实验室检查以及妇科患者手术部位感染有关。此外,使用替代抗生素会导致抗生素耐药性增加、毒性增加以及医疗成本增加。此外,有I型速发型过敏反应病史的患者使用抗生素会有再次接触时发生过敏反应的风险。幸运的是,报告对青霉素过敏的患者中,超过90%并非真正过敏,如果使用青霉素,他们能够耐受。这可能是由于将初始反应错误标记为过敏(当它是由药物不耐受或病毒疹引起时),或者随着时间推移免疫球蛋白E介导的免疫力减弱。鉴于此,即使在孕期,也广泛推荐进行过敏评估。过敏评估包括详细的患者病史以及根据情况进行皮肤试验和/或口服激发试验等过敏测试。这些方法已被证明在孕妇和非孕妇中都是安全有效的,并且在适当使用时会增加一线抗生素的使用。此外,即使在真正对青霉素过敏的情况下,与头孢菌素的交叉反应也极低,在已证实对青霉素过敏的患者中估计为2%至3%,在未证实对青霉素过敏的患者中则远低于此。指南支持在未证实为非过敏性青霉素过敏的患者中常规使用头孢菌素,无需进行测试或额外预防措施;即使在有过敏性青霉素过敏的患者中,也支持常规使用结构不同的头孢菌素(特别是头孢唑林)。在没有比患者过敏药物更合适的替代抗生素的情况下,例如对青霉素过敏的孕妇患有梅毒,可以进行脱敏治疗。这个过程包括通过接触少量过敏原暂时诱导药物耐受性,直到达到治疗剂量,并且已在孕期安全进行。脱敏需要专家监督,并且最常在重症监护环境中由多学科团队进行。妇产科领域遇到的另外两种最常见的抗生素过敏是头孢菌素过敏和甲硝唑过敏。头孢菌素过敏的处理与青霉素过敏类似,可进行容易获得的皮肤试验和口服激发试验。甲硝唑过敏的皮肤试验缺乏敏感性和特异性,因此,口服激发试验或脱敏程序分别是低风险和高风险患者的首选方法。对于药物过敏,尤其是抗生素过敏,妇产科医生的作用是识别报告有过敏反应的患者,并尽快将患者转诊给专科医生进行进一步评估。使用详细的患者病史和必要时进行过敏测试(皮肤试验和/或口服激发试验)进行过敏评估已被证明是安全有效的,并且是抗生素管理的重要组成部分。