Mc Causland Finnian R, Vaduganathan Muthiah, Claggett Brian L, Kulac Ian J, Desai Akshay S, Jhund Pardeep S, Henderson Alasdair D, Brinker Meike, Perkins Robert, Scheerer Markus F, Schloemer Patrick, Lam Carolyn S P, Senni Michele, Shah Sanjiv J, Voors Adriaan A, Zannad Faiez, Pitt Bertram, McMurray John J V, Solomon Scott D
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Jan 21;85(2):159-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.10.091. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
Finerenone has kidney-protective effects in patients with chronic kidney disease with type 2 diabetes, but effects on kidney outcomes in patients with heart failure with and without diabetes and/or chronic kidney disease are not known.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of finerenone on kidney outcomes in FINEARTS-HF (Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure), a randomized trial of finerenone vs placebo among patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction.
We explored the effects of finerenone on the secondary outcome of a sustained ≥50% estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline or kidney failure (sustained eGFR decline <15 mL/min/1.73 m; initiation of maintenance dialysis; renal transplantation). In this prespecified analysis, we also report effects of finerenone on: 1) sustained ≥57% eGFR decline or kidney failure; 2) eGFR slope; and 3) changes in urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR).
Among 6,001 participants, mean baseline eGFR was 62 ± 20 mL/min/1.73 m; 48% had eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m. Overall, 5,797 had baseline UACR data (median: 18 mg/g [Q1-Q3: 7-67 mg/g]). Over 2.6 years median follow-up, the incidence of the composite kidney outcome (≥50% eGFR decline or kidney failure) was numerically, but nonsignificantly, higher for finerenone vs placebo (75 vs 55 events; HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.94-1.89). Similar results were observed for the composite of ≥57% eGFR decline or kidney failure (41 vs 31 events; HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 0.80-2.05), although the overall event frequency was relatively low. During the first 3 months, finerenone led to an acute decline in eGFR of -2.9 mL/min/1.73 m (95% CI: -3.4 to -2.4 mL/min/1.73 m) but did not alter chronic (from 3 months) eGFR slope (+0.2 mL/min/1.73 m per year; 95% CI: -0.1 to 0.4 mL/min/1.73 m per year), vs placebo. The difference in total slope was -0.7 mL/min/1.73 m per year (95% CI: -0.9 to -0.4 mL/min/1.73 m per year.). Finerenone reduced UACR by 30% (95% CI: 25%-34%) over 6 months vs placebo, an effect that persisted throughout follow-up. Finerenone reduced the risk of new-onset of microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria by 24% (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.68-0.83) and 38% (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.53-0.73), respectively.
In FINEARTS-HF, a population at low risk of adverse kidney outcomes, finerenone did not significantly modify the kidney composite outcomes. Finerenone led to a greater reduction in initial eGFR, but did not result in a significant difference in chronic eGFR slope vs placebo. Finerenone led to early and sustained reductions in albuminuria and reduced the risk of new-onset micro- and macroalbuminuria. (FINEARTS-HF [Study to Evaluate the Efficacy (Effect on Disease) and Safety of Finerenon on Morbidity (Events Indicating Disease Worsening) & Mortality (Death Rate) in Participants with Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke) Greater or Equal to 40%]; NCT04435626).
非奈利酮对2型糖尿病慢性肾脏病患者具有肾脏保护作用,但对合并或不合并糖尿病和/或慢性肾脏病的心力衰竭患者肾脏结局的影响尚不清楚。
本研究旨在探讨非奈利酮对FINEARTS-HF(非奈利酮治疗心力衰竭患者疗效和安全性优于安慰剂的试验)中肾脏结局的影响,这是一项在射血分数轻度降低或保留的心力衰竭患者中比较非奈利酮与安慰剂的随机试验。
我们探讨了非奈利酮对以下次要结局的影响:持续估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)下降≥50%或肾衰竭(持续eGFR下降<15 mL/min/1.73 m²;开始维持性透析;肾移植)。在这项预先设定的分析中,我们还报告了非奈利酮对以下方面的影响:1)持续eGFR下降≥57%或肾衰竭;2)eGFR斜率;3)尿白蛋白/肌酐比值(UACR)的变化。
在6001名参与者中,平均基线eGFR为62±20 mL/min/1.73 m²;48%的患者eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m²。总体而言,5797名患者有基线UACR数据(中位数:18 mg/g [四分位间距:7-67 mg/g])。在2.6年的中位随访期内,非奈利酮组复合肾脏结局(eGFR下降≥50%或肾衰竭)的发生率在数值上高于安慰剂组,但无显著差异(75例对55例;风险比:1.33;95%置信区间:0.94-1.89)。对于eGFR下降≥57%或肾衰竭的复合结局(41例对31例;风险比:1.28;95%置信区间:0.80-2.05)也观察到类似结果,尽管总体事件频率相对较低。在最初3个月内,与安慰剂相比,非奈利酮导致eGFR急性下降-2.9 mL/min/1.73 m²(95%置信区间:-3.4至-2.4 mL/min/1.73 m²),但未改变慢性(3个月后)eGFR斜率(每年+0.2 mL/min/1.73 m²;95%置信区间:-0.1至0.4 mL/min/1.73 m²/年)。总斜率差异为每年-0.7 mL/min/