Suppr超能文献

非奈利酮用于心力衰竭及PREDICT-HFpEF模型估计的风险:FINEARTS-HF的二次分析

Finerenone for Heart Failure and Risk Estimated by the PREDICT-HFpEF Model: A Secondary Analysis of FINEARTS-HF.

作者信息

McDowell Kirsty, Docherty Kieran F, Campbell Ross T, Henderson Alasdair D, Jhund Pardeep S, Claggett Brian L, Desai Akshay S, Lay-Flurrie James, Hofmeister Lucas, Scalise Andrea, Lam Carolyn S P, Petrie Mark C, Schou Morten, Senni Michele, Shah Sanjiv J, Udell Jacob A, Zannad Faiez, Pitt Bertram, Vaduganathan Muthiah, Solomon Scott D, McMurray John J V

机构信息

School of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Health, British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Mar 5. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0025.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have a spectrum of risk, and the effect of therapies may vary by risk.

OBJECTIVES

To validate the Prognostic Models for Mortality and Morbidity in HFpEF (PREDICT-HFpEF) in the phase 3 randomized clinical trial Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) and to evaluate the effect of finerenone, compared with placebo, across the spectrum of risk in these patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The FINEARTS-HF trial was conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Participants were adults 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular EF of 40% or greater randomized between September 2020 and January 2023.

INTERVENTION

Finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The 3 PREDICT-HFpEF risk scores for the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death, respectively, were calculated. Predicted risk was compared with observed outcomes. Model performance was assessed using the Harrell C statistic. The rates of the predicted outcomes (plus the composite of cardiovascular death and worsening HF events, which was the primary end point in the trial) were examined according to quintiles of risk score, as was the effect of finerenone according to risk quintiles.

RESULTS

A total of 6001 patients (mean [SD] age, 72 [9.6] years; 3269 male [54.5%]) were randomized in the FINEARTS-HF trial. The C statistics for cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death at 2 years were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.72), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.66-0.71), and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.67-0.71), respectively. The risk of the composite outcomes was approximately 8- to 10-fold higher in those in the highest compared with the lowest risk quintile. The relative risk reduction with finerenone compared with placebo was consistent across the spectrum of risk for all outcomes examined (eg, interaction P value for primary outcome = .24).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Results of the FINEARTS-HF randomized clinical trial demonstrate that the PREDICT-HFpEF models performed well in terms of calibration and discrimination. Baseline risk did not modify the benefit of finerenone.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

摘要

重要性

射血分数轻度降低(HFmrEF)或射血分数保留(HFpEF)的心力衰竭(HF)患者存在一系列风险,治疗效果可能因风险而异。

目的

在3期随机临床试验非奈利酮试验(Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure,FINEARTS-HF)中验证HFpEF患者死亡和发病的预后模型(PREDICT-HFpEF),并评估非奈利酮与安慰剂相比,在这些患者的整个风险范围内的效果。

设计、地点和参与者:FINEARTS-HF试验在37个国家的653个地点进行。参与者为40岁及以上有症状HF且左心室射血分数为40%或更高的成年人,于2020年9月至2023年1月期间随机分组。

干预措施

非奈利酮(滴定至20mg或40mg)或安慰剂。

主要结局和测量指标

分别计算心血管死亡或HF住院、心血管死亡和全因死亡这3种复合结局的PREDICT-HFpEF风险评分。将预测风险与观察到的结局进行比较。使用Harrell C统计量评估模型性能。根据风险评分五分位数检查预测结局的发生率(加上心血管死亡和HF恶化事件的复合结局,这是试验的主要终点),以及非奈利酮根据风险五分位数的效果。

结果

FINEARTS-HF试验共纳入6001例患者(平均[标准差]年龄,72[9.6]岁;3269例男性[54.5%])。2年时心血管死亡或HF住院、心血管死亡和全因死亡的C统计量分别为0.71(95%CI,0.69-0.72)、0.68(95%CI,0.66-0.71)和0.69(95%CI,0.67-0.71)。最高风险五分位数患者的复合结局风险比最低风险五分位数患者高约8至10倍。与安慰剂相比,非奈利酮在所有检查结局的整个风险范围内的相对风险降低是一致的(例如,主要结局的交互P值=0.24)。

结论和相关性

FINEARTS-HF随机临床试验结果表明,PREDICT-HFpEF模型在校准和区分方面表现良好。基线风险并未改变非奈利酮的益处。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04435626。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Error in Figure 3.图3中的错误。
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Jun 1;10(6):635. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.1107.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验