• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

子宫内膜异位症腹腔镜切除与消融的患者认知及体验:症状与生活质量结局的众包比较评估

Patient Perception and Experience of Laparoscopic Excision Versus Ablation of Endometriosis: A Crowd-Sourced Comparative Evaluation of Symptom and Quality of Life Outcomes.

作者信息

Isaac Amital, Kapetanakis Theodoros, Thibeault Erica, Chatburn Luke, Mackenzie Malcolm

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Endometriosis Care Center, Waltham, MA, (all authors); At Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, MA, (all authors).

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Endometriosis Care Center, Waltham, MA, (all authors); At Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, MA, (all authors).

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2025 Mar;32(3):248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.10.014. Epub 2024 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2024.10.014
PMID:39490891
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare laparoscopic Ablation and Excision in terms of symptom and Quality of Life outcomes as perceived by endometriosis patients.

DESIGN

A Cohort, Method comparison Questionnaire-based study.

SETTING

Endometriosis-focused Social Media site.

PATIENTS

Endometriosis patients with history of Laparoscopic Ablation and Excision.

INTERVENTIONS

On-line questionnaire focused on pre and post procedure (ablation and excision) outcomes across 63 measures in 5 realms: Physical Symptoms, Functional Impact, Psycho-emotional Impact, Social/Sexual Impact, Economic/Educational Impact.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-two respondents with surgical history that included laparoscopic ablation and excision (without concomitant or interposed hysterectomy) identified for ablation only physical symptom improvement of 11.3% and 8.5% for dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia respectively. Ablation provided no significant improvement in any other physical symptom measure. Excision was identified as providing improvements across all symptoms, ranging from 28% to 46%. In terms of functional Impact, ablation provided non-significant improvements or worsening of status. Excision demonstrated significant improvement for patients across most measures of Functional Impact. In terms of Psycho-emotional Impact, a worsening of quality of life status is identified in 23 of 24 measures following ablation. Excision demonstrated improvement in 22 of 24 measures. For Social-Sexual Impact, ablation resulted in worsened status across all measures, with excision demonstrating improvements in all measures, significantly so in most. For Economic/Educational Impact, significant worsening of measures or insignificant improvements were demonstrated following ablation. Excision demonstrated significant improvement in most measures. In all realms, pre-Excision status was worse than pre-Ablation. Allowing for a more focused comparison of ablation and excision, 113 respondents with a surgical history of ablation sequentially followed by excision demonstrated outcomes similar to the larger group: overall worsening of status resulting from ablation and overall improvement in status following excision with pre-Excision morbidity higher than pre-Ablation.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients undergoing laparoscopic endometriosis excision after having undergone endometriosis ablation, the former demonstrated greater beneficial effects over a broad spectrum of symptoms and quality of life measures.

摘要

研究目的

比较腹腔镜消融术和切除术在子宫内膜异位症患者所感知的症状及生活质量结果方面的差异。

设计

一项队列、方法比较的基于问卷的研究。

地点

专注于子宫内膜异位症的社交媒体网站。

患者

有腹腔镜消融术和切除术病史的子宫内膜异位症患者。

干预措施

在线问卷聚焦于手术前(消融术和切除术)后在5个领域63项指标上的结果,这5个领域为:身体症状、功能影响、心理情感影响、社会/性影响、经济/教育影响。

测量指标及主要结果

232名有手术史(包括腹腔镜消融术和切除术,无同时进行或中间穿插子宫切除术)的受访者中,仅接受消融术的患者痛经和月经过多的身体症状改善率分别为11.3%和8.5%。消融术在其他任何身体症状指标上均未带来显著改善。切除术在所有症状方面均有改善,改善幅度在28%至46%之间。在功能影响方面,消融术对功能状态的改善不显著或使其恶化。切除术在大多数功能影响指标上使患者有显著改善。在心理情感影响方面,消融术后24项指标中有23项生活质量状态恶化。切除术在24项指标中有22项显示改善。在社会/性影响方面,消融术使所有指标的状态恶化,切除术在所有指标上均有改善,大多数指标改善显著。在经济/教育影响方面,消融术后指标显著恶化或改善不显著。切除术在大多数指标上有显著改善。在所有领域,切除术前的状态比消融术前更差。为了更有针对性地比较消融术和切除术,113名有消融术手术史随后又接受切除术的受访者的结果与较大样本组相似:消融术导致状态总体恶化,切除术使状态总体改善,切除术前的发病率高于消融术前。

结论

在这组先接受子宫内膜异位症消融术然后接受腹腔镜子宫内膜异位症切除术的患者中,后者在广泛的症状和生活质量指标方面显示出更大的有益效果。

相似文献

1
Patient Perception and Experience of Laparoscopic Excision Versus Ablation of Endometriosis: A Crowd-Sourced Comparative Evaluation of Symptom and Quality of Life Outcomes.子宫内膜异位症腹腔镜切除与消融的患者认知及体验:症状与生活质量结局的众包比较评估
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2025 Mar;32(3):248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.10.014. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
2
Surgical treatment of endometriosis in private practice: cohort study with mean follow-up of 3 years.私人执业中子宫内膜异位症的手术治疗:平均随访 3 年的队列研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):42-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.09.019.
3
Surgical Excision Versus Ablation for Superficial Endometriosis-Associated Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.手术切除与消融治疗浅表子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的随机对照试验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jan;26(1):71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
4
Laparoscopic Excision Versus Ablation for Endometriosis-associated Pain: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹腔镜切除与消融治疗子宫内膜异位症相关性疼痛:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jul-Aug;24(5):747-756. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
5
Hysteroscopic rollerball endometrial ablation as an alternative treatment for adenomyosis with menorrhagia and/or dysmenorrhea.宫腔镜滚球子宫内膜切除术作为子宫腺肌病伴月经过多和/或痛经的替代治疗方法。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010 Oct;36(5):1031-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01251.x. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
6
Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis.子宫内膜异位症的腹腔镜手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 23;10(10):CD011031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011031.pub3.
7
Pain and Quality of Life after Laparoscopic Excision of Endometriosis.腹腔镜子宫内膜异位症切除术后的疼痛和生活质量。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Nov-Dec;27(7):1610-1617.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.03.013. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
8
Patient Quality of Life and Symptoms after Surgical Treatment for Endometriosis.子宫内膜异位症手术治疗后的患者生活质量和症状。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 May-Jun;26(4):717-726. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
9
Laparoscopic Surgery for Severe Rectovaginal Endometriosis Compromising the Bowel: A Prospective Cohort Study.腹腔镜手术治疗累及肠道的重度直肠阴道子宫内膜异位症:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 May-Jun;23(4):526-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.12.006. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
10
An evaluation of quality of life in women with endometriosis who underwent primary surgery: a 6-month follow up in Sabah Women & Children Hospital, Sabah, Malaysia.对接受初次手术的子宫内膜异位症女性患者生活质量的评估:在马来西亚沙巴州妇女儿童医院进行的6个月随访
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Oct;37(7):906-911. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1312302. Epub 2017 Jun 15.