Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Halstead 840, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
International Infection Control Program, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Nov 3;13(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01484-4.
Infection prevention and control (IPC) programs are essential to prevent and control the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms in healthcare facilities (HCFs). The current implementation of these programs in Latin America remains largely unknown.
We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of IPC program implementation in HCFs from Guatemala, Panama, Ecuador, and Argentina, March-July 2022. We used the World Health Organization (WHO) IPC Assessment Framework (IPCAF) survey, a previously validated structured questionnaire with an associated scoring system that evaluates the eight core components of IPC (IPC program; IPC guidelines; IPC education and training; healthcare-associated infection [HAI] surveillance; multimodal strategies; monitoring and audit of IPC practices and feedback; workload, staffing, and bed occupancy; and the built environment and materials and equipment for IPC). Each section generates a score 0-100. According to the final score, the HCF IPC program implementation is categorized into four levels: inadequate (0-200), basic (201-400), intermediate (401-600), or advanced (601-800). Additionally, we conducted semi-structured interviews among IPC personnel and microbiologists using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model to evaluate barriers and facilitators for IPC program implementation. We performed directed content analysis of interview transcripts to identify themes that focused on barriers and facilitators of IPC program implementation which are summarized descriptively.
Thirty-seven HCFs (15 for-profit and 22 non-profit) completed the IPCAF survey. The overall median score was 614 (IQR 569, 693) which corresponded to an "advanced" level of IPC implementation (32% [7/22] non-profit vs. 93% [14/15] for-profit HCFs in this category). The lowest scores were in workload, staffing and bed occupancy followed by IPC training and multimodal strategies. Forty individuals from 16 HCFs were interviewed. They perceived inadequate staffing and technical resources, limited leadership support, and cultural determinants as major barriers to effective IPC guideline implementation, while external accreditation and technical support from public health authorities were perceived as facilitators.
Efforts to strengthen IPC activities in Latin American HCFs should focus on improving support from hospital leadership and public health authorities to ensure better resource allocation, promoting safety culture, and improving training in quality improvement.
感染预防和控制(IPC)计划对于预防和控制医疗机构(HCF)中多药耐药菌的传播至关重要。目前,拉丁美洲在这些计划的实施方面仍知之甚少。
我们对 2022 年 3 月至 7 月期间来自危地马拉、巴拿马、厄瓜多尔和阿根廷的 HCF 中的 IPC 计划实施情况进行了混合方法评估。我们使用了世界卫生组织(WHO)的 IPC 评估框架(IPCAF)调查,这是一种先前经过验证的结构化问卷,具有相关的评分系统,用于评估 IPC 的八个核心组成部分(IPC 计划;IPC 指南;IPC 教育和培训;医疗相关感染[HAI]监测;多模式策略;IPC 实践的监测、审核和反馈;工作量、人员配备和床位占用;以及 IPC 的建筑环境和材料及设备)。每个部分的得分范围为 0-100。根据最终得分,HCF 的 IPC 计划实施情况分为四个级别:不足(0-200)、基本(201-400)、中级(401-600)或高级(601-800)。此外,我们还根据患者安全系统工程倡议,对 IPC 人员和微生物学家进行了半结构化访谈,以评估 IPC 计划实施的障碍和促进因素。我们对访谈记录进行了有针对性的内容分析,以确定重点关注 IPC 计划实施障碍和促进因素的主题,并进行描述性总结。
37 家 HCF(15 家营利性和 22 家非营利性)完成了 IPCAF 调查。总体中位数评分为 614(IQR 569,693),对应于 IPC 实施的“高级”水平(32%[22 家非营利性中的 7 家]与 93%[15 家营利性中的 14 家])。得分最低的是工作量、人员配备和床位占用,其次是 IPC 培训和多模式策略。来自 16 家 HCF 的 40 人接受了访谈。他们认为人员配备和技术资源不足、领导层支持有限以及文化决定因素是有效实施 IPC 指南的主要障碍,而外部认证和公共卫生当局的技术支持被认为是促进因素。
加强拉丁美洲 HCF 中 IPC 活动的努力应侧重于改善医院领导层和公共卫生当局的支持,以确保更好的资源分配,促进安全文化,并改进质量改进培训。