Brunner Wendy M, Han Zhuang, Tennyson Sharon, Fiduccia Peter C, Krupa Nicole, Kjolhede Chris
Research Institute, Bassett Medical Center, Cooperstown, NY.
Department of Global Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
J Pediatr. 2025 Feb;277:114385. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114385. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
To test the hypothesis that students with asthma who have access to school-based health centers (SBHCs) receive more recommended preventive care and use less emergency care, we compared patterns of health care utilization among rural students with asthma by SBHC access.
Using a cross-sectional design, we analyzed encounters for all patients ages 4 through 19 living in 4 counties covered by a health care system that sponsors a network of SBHCs in rural upstate New York. Patient addresses for each encounter were geocoded to school districts, allowing us to determine whether students lived in districts with (n = 15) or without (n = 23) a SBHC. We measured utilization among students with asthma in 2016 and 2017, comparing measures by SBHC access. Students with asthma were identified using International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes from visits in the 2 calendar years prior to each analysis year.
Students in districts with SBHCs had greater odds of 2 or more asthma-related office visits (odds ratio [OR] = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.66-2.99) and 1 or more well-child visits (OR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.03-1.50) than their peers in districts without SBHCs. Students in districts with SBHCs had lower odds of a respiratory-related convenient care or emergency department visit (OR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.30-0.67). Across outcomes, differences were greatest when comparing students who utilized the SBHC in their district with students in districts who did not have access to a SBHC.
Rural students with asthma who have access to SBHCs have greater opportunities for preventive asthma care per national guidelines and use emergency departments and convenient care less.
为验证以下假设,即能够使用校内健康中心(SBHC)的哮喘学生接受更多推荐的预防性护理且较少使用急诊护理,我们比较了可使用SBHC的农村哮喘学生的医疗保健利用模式。
采用横断面设计,我们分析了居住在纽约州北部农村地区、由一个赞助SBHC网络的医疗保健系统覆盖的4个县中,所有4至19岁患者的就诊情况。每次就诊的患者地址经地理编码到学区,使我们能够确定学生是否生活在设有SBHC的学区(n = 15)或未设SBHC的学区(n = 23)。我们测量了2016年和2017年哮喘学生的利用率,并按是否可使用SBHC比较各项指标。在每个分析年份之前的2个日历年中,使用国际疾病分类诊断代码从就诊记录中识别哮喘学生。
设有SBHC的学区的学生进行2次或更多次与哮喘相关门诊就诊的几率(优势比[OR] = 2.23;95%置信区间:1.66 - 2.99)和1次或更多次健康儿童就诊的几率(OR = 1.24;95%置信区间:1.03 - 1.50)高于未设SBHC的学区的同龄人。设有SBHC的学区的学生进行呼吸道相关便捷护理或急诊科就诊的几率较低(OR = 0.45;95%置信区间:0.30 - 0.67)。在各项结果中,将在本学区使用SBHC的学生与无法使用SBHC的学区的学生进行比较时,差异最大。
能够使用SBHC的农村哮喘学生根据国家指南有更多机会接受哮喘预防性护理,且较少使用急诊科和便捷护理。