Zhang Xue, Tennyson Sharon, Kjolhede Chris L, Brunner Wendy M
Department of Biobehavioral Health, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Jeb E. Brooks School of Public Policy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Jun 28;69(4):107962. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107962.
School-based health centers (SBHCs) in rural communities improve students' access to primary care, but evidence on service utilization patterns is limited.
The 2011-2017 electronic health record data for students (aged 5-18 years) who used primary care were analyzed to compare utilization patterns (total number of office visits, well-child, immunization, chronic-condition visits) in a 4-county rural region of New York. Students were categorized into no-SBHC-access (living in school districts without SBHCs) and SBHC-access (living in districts with SBHCs). Students with SBHC-access were further categorized into SBHC-non-users (with SBHCs access but not using SBHCs), SBHC-only-users (only using SBHCs), and hybrid users (using SBHCs and other primary care providers). Treatment effects of SBHC-access and usage categories were estimated, adjusting for age, sex (defined in health record), year, community-level socioeconomic factors, and student/school district random effects. Hybrid-users' visits were stratified by site (SBHCs versus non-SBHCs clinic). Analyses were performed in 2025.
Students with SBHC access included 24% SBHC-non-users, 52% SBHC-only-users , and 24% hybrid users. SBHC-access category was associated with greater primary care utilization than no-SBHC-access category. Results differed within SBHC-access: hybrid users had the highest utilization, whereas SBHC-non-users had the lowest. SBHC-only-users had more office visits and were more likely to have immunizations than students without SBHCs access. Hybrid users had more office visits and immunizations at SBHCs than at other primary care clinics.
SBHCs increased overall office visits and immunizations among students using primary care in this rural region. Promoting SBHCs enrollment and use is important because effects were seen only among students who utilized the SBHCs.
农村社区的校本健康中心(SBHC)改善了学生获得初级保健的机会,但关于服务利用模式的证据有限。
分析了2011 - 2017年使用初级保健的5至18岁学生的电子健康记录数据,以比较纽约一个四县农村地区的利用模式(门诊就诊总数、健康儿童、免疫接种、慢性病就诊)。学生被分为无SBHC服务(居住在没有SBHC的学区)和有SBHC服务(居住在有SBHC的学区)。有SBHC服务的学生进一步分为非SBHC使用者(有SBHC服务但未使用)、仅使用SBHC者(仅使用SBHC)和混合使用者(使用SBHC和其他初级保健提供者)。估计了有SBHC服务和使用类别对治疗的影响,并对年龄、性别(在健康记录中定义)、年份、社区层面的社会经济因素以及学生/学区随机效应进行了调整。混合使用者的就诊按地点(SBHC与非SBHC诊所)分层。分析于2025年进行。
有SBHC服务的学生中,24%为非SBHC使用者,52%为仅使用SBHC者,24%为混合使用者。有SBHC服务类别与比无SBHC服务类别更高的初级保健利用率相关。在有SBHC服务的人群中结果有所不同:混合使用者利用率最高,而非SBHC使用者最低。仅使用SBHC者比没有SBHC服务的学生有更多的门诊就诊,并且更有可能进行免疫接种。混合使用者在SBHC的门诊就诊和免疫接种比在其他初级保健诊所更多。
在这个农村地区,SBHC增加了使用初级保健的学生的总体门诊就诊和免疫接种。促进SBHC的注册和使用很重要,因为效果仅在使用SBHC的学生中可见。