Abinandan Sudharsanam, Praveen Kuppan, Venkateswarlu Kadiyala, Megharaj Mallavarapu
Global Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), College of Engineering, Science and Environment, ATC Building, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of Environment (CRC CARE), University of Newcastle, ATC Building, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Formerly Department of Microbiology, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Anantapuramu 515003, India.
Water Res. 2023 Oct 22;247:120778. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120778.
Microplastics (MPs) are one of the emerging pollutants, causing potential harm to aquatic ecosystems and serious concern in achieving UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Realizing the occurrence of varying concentrations of MPs in the environment, this investigation presents multi-dimensional insights into the ecological and bioeconomic implications at environmentally relevant concentrations. We pursued a multi-step approach to gain a comprehensive understanding on the effects of microalgae‒MPs interactions and their expansive implications toward SDGs. Baseline data generated using a model microalga, Raphidocelis subcapitata, and three MPs (polyethylene terephthalate, PET; polyvinyl chloride, PVC; and polystyrene, PS) indicated 10‒15 % reduction in microalgal growth rate relative to the control, pointing to a heightened energy demand. The biochemical impacts displayed concentration-dependent variability. Using the baseline data, we developed a linear regression model to dissect the interaction effects around the primary dimensions of Ecology and Bioeconomy. Notably, a correlation matrix for carbon allocation pinpointed PET as having a more pronounced impact compared to PVC and PS, with the model accounting for 33.72 % of the observed variance. Extending our insights from the model, we adopted an evidence-based methodology to outline the broader implications across the Ecology and Bioeconomy domains, and subsequently identified their associations with specific SDGs. Further probing into microalgae‒MPs interaction effects at environmentally relevant concentration, our model revealed that the selected MPs perturbed the ecological variables. Interestingly, when carbon allocation was assessed to study bioeconomic implications, there were contrasting effects on starch synthesis (beneficially) and lipid synthesis (detrimentally). The present combined analysis revealed that MPs, beyond their traditional association with SDG 14 (Life Below Water), directly and indirectly affect five other SDGs through their interactions with microalgae. This study thus underscores the complex and interconnected nature of MPs pollution at environmentally relevant concentrations and their impacts on ecological and bioeconomic aspects of SDGs, thereby highlighting the urgent need for additional research and effective mitigation strategies.
微塑料(MPs)是新出现的污染物之一,对水生生态系统造成潜在危害,并在实现联合国可持续发展目标(SDGs)方面引发严重关切。鉴于认识到环境中存在不同浓度的微塑料,本研究对与环境相关浓度下的生态和生物经济影响进行了多维度洞察。我们采用了多步骤方法,以全面了解微藻与微塑料相互作用的影响及其对可持续发展目标的广泛影响。使用模式微藻——亚心形扁藻(Raphidocelis subcapitata)以及三种微塑料(聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯,PET;聚氯乙烯,PVC;聚苯乙烯,PS)生成的基线数据表明,相对于对照,微藻生长速率降低了10%至15%,这表明能量需求增加。生化影响呈现出浓度依赖性变化。利用基线数据,我们开发了一个线性回归模型,以剖析围绕生态和生物经济主要维度的相互作用影响。值得注意的是,碳分配的相关矩阵指出,与PVC和PS相比,PET具有更显著的影响,该模型解释了33.72%的观测方差。从该模型扩展我们的见解,我们采用基于证据的方法概述了生态和生物经济领域的更广泛影响,并随后确定了它们与特定可持续发展目标的关联。进一步探究与环境相关浓度下微藻与微塑料的相互作用影响,我们的模型表明,所选微塑料扰乱了生态变量。有趣的是,当评估碳分配以研究生物经济影响时,对淀粉合成(有益)和脂质合成(有害)有相反的影响。目前的综合分析表明,微塑料除了与可持续发展目标14(水下生物)有传统关联外,还通过与微藻的相互作用直接和间接影响其他五个可持续发展目标。因此,本研究强调了与环境相关浓度下微塑料污染的复杂和相互关联的性质及其对可持续发展目标生态和生物经济方面的影响,从而突出了进一步研究和有效缓解策略的迫切需求。