Almansour Abdullah, Bartlett David, Addison Owen
Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Dent Mater. 2023 Oct 26. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.10.016.
To determine the indentation-load dependency of the observed changes in surface microhardness of occlusal and buccal enamel polished surfaces before and after a dietary acid exposure.
Enamel specimens (n = 20) were obtained from previously extracted human molars. The samples were divided into two groups, buccal and occlusal (n = 10). Both groups were exposed to 0.3% citric acid at pH 2.7 over different time periods. The mean 3D step-heights defined by ISO 5436-1 standard of the erosion scar was calculated using a white light profilometer. Vickers microhardness testing was carried out to discriminate the surface mechanical changes and different loading regimens used to provide an estimate of depth related changes to the enamel sub-surface. Differences between groups were assessed using two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Sidak's multiple comparisons tests at α = 0.05.
A two-way ANOVA identified that erosion duration significantly influenced step-height (p < 0.01). The factorial analysis also identified a significant increase in step-height on occlusal surfaces compared to buccal surfaces (p < 0.01). At 5 min the mean 3D step-heights µm ± (SD) on the occlusal surface was 3.6 ± (0.65) and on the buccal surface was 3.1 ± (0.60) which increased after 60 mins to 32.9 ± (3.43) and 30.1 ± (3.34), respectively. In contrast to the non-eroded surface, increasing the indentation load on eroded enamel resulted in a significantly increased HV (p < 0.01) suggesting a significant modification to the enamel's response to an increasing indentation load.
Occlusal surfaces following acid exposure were more prone to erosion scar relative to buccal surfaces in vitro. Different loading regimens estimated the hardness of the erosive lesion from the outermost surface through the unaffected enamel.
确定饮食性酸暴露前后,咬合面和颊面釉质抛光表面观察到的表面显微硬度变化与压痕负荷的相关性。
从先前拔除的人类磨牙中获取釉质标本(n = 20)。样本分为两组,颊面组和咬合面组(n = 10)。两组均在不同时间段暴露于pH 2.7的0.3%柠檬酸中。使用白光轮廓仪计算由ISO 5436-1标准定义的侵蚀瘢痕的平均3D台阶高度。进行维氏显微硬度测试,以区分表面机械变化以及用于估计釉质亚表面深度相关变化的不同加载方案。使用双向方差分析评估组间差异,并在α = 0.05时进行事后Sidak多重比较检验。
双向方差分析表明,侵蚀持续时间对台阶高度有显著影响(p < 0.01)。因子分析还表明,与颊面相比,咬合面的台阶高度显著增加(p < 0.01)。5分钟时,咬合面的平均3D台阶高度µm ± (标准差)为3.6 ± (0.65),颊面为3.1 ± (0.60),60分钟后分别增加到32.9 ± (3.43)和30. ± (3.34)。与未侵蚀表面相比,增加侵蚀釉质上的压痕负荷会导致维氏硬度显著增加(p < 0.01),这表明釉质对增加的压痕负荷的反应发生了显著改变。
体外实验中,酸暴露后的咬合面相对于颊面更容易出现侵蚀瘢痕。不同的加载方案可估计从最外表面到未受影响釉质的侵蚀性病变的硬度。