Almeida da Silva Luiz Carlos, Hori Yusuke, Kaymaz Burak, Rogers Kenneth J, Trionfo Arianna, Bowen James Richard, Howard Jason J, Shrader Michael Wade, Miller Freeman
Department of Orthopaedics, Nemours Children's Health, Wilmington, DE, United States.
J Child Orthop. 2024 Sep 10;18(5):523-530. doi: 10.1177/18632521241277023. eCollection 2024 Oct.
The neck-shaft angle and head-shaft angle in children with varying levels of neurological disability were evaluated to define change over different ages.
Children aged 1-12 years with spastic cerebral palsy, spinal muscular atrophy types 1 and 2, or typical development were reviewed to evaluate the neck-shaft angle and head-shaft angle. Patients were divided into five groups: Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I and II, Gross Motor Function Classification System level III, Gross Motor Function Classification System levels IV and V, spinal muscular atrophy types 1 and 2, and typical development. A linear mixed model was utilized to evaluate neck-shaft angle and head-shaft angle.
Data from 196 children (mean age 4.8 ± 4.5 years) were included. Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I and II: 22 children, 130 hip radiographs measured, neck-shaft angle 143.7 ± 7.4, and head-shaft angle 160.0 ± 7.1. Gross Motor Function Classification System level III: 8 children, 33 hips evaluated, neck-shaft angle 153.1 ± 4.3, and head-shaft angle 163.4 ± 4.2. Gross Motor Function Classification System levels IV and V: 30 children, 137 hip radiographs measured, neck-shaft angle 156.4 ± 5.6, and head-shaft angle 167.9 ± 6.8. Spinal muscular atrophy types 1 and 2: 32 children, 83 hip radiographs measured, neck-shaft angle 161.9 ± 9.7, and head-shaft angle 173.4 ± 7.4. Typical development: 104 children, 222 hip radiographs measured, neck-shaft angle 138.6 ± 7.0, and head-shaft angle 156.4 ± 5.9. There were significant statistical differences when comparing neck-shaft angle and head-shaft angle.
As children grow, neck-shaft angle and head-shaft angle tend to decrease in typical development and Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I and II groups. However, in low-tone (spinal muscular atrophy types 1 and 2) and high-tone groups (Gross Motor Function Classification System levels IV and V), neck-shaft angle and head-shaft angle tend to increase with age. In both low-tone and high-tone groups, coxa valga is observed. When evaluating the effect of proximal femur-guided growth, these defined normal growth patterns should be considered.
Level III Retrospective comparative study.
评估不同神经功能障碍程度儿童的颈干角和头干角,以明确其在不同年龄段的变化。
对年龄在1至12岁的痉挛型脑瘫、1型和2型脊髓性肌萎缩症患儿或发育正常儿童进行回顾性研究,以评估颈干角和头干角。患者分为五组:粗大运动功能分级系统I级和II级、粗大运动功能分级系统III级、粗大运动功能分级系统IV级和V级、1型和2型脊髓性肌萎缩症、发育正常。采用线性混合模型评估颈干角和头干角。
纳入196名儿童(平均年龄4.8±4.5岁)的数据。粗大运动功能分级系统I级和II级:22名儿童,测量130张髋部X线片,颈干角143.7±7.4,头干角160.0±7.1。粗大运动功能分级系统III级:8名儿童,评估33个髋关节,颈干角153.1±4.3,头干角163.4±4.2。粗大运动功能分级系统IV级和V级:30名儿童,测量137张髋部X线片,颈干角156.4±5.6,头干角167.9±6.8。1型和2型脊髓性肌萎缩症:32名儿童,测量83张髋部X线片,颈干角161.9±9.7,头干角173.4±7.4。发育正常:104名儿童,测量222张髋部X线片,颈干角138.6±7.0,头干角156.4±5.9。比较颈干角和头干角时存在显著统计学差异。
随着儿童生长,发育正常以及粗大运动功能分级系统I级和II级组的颈干角和头干角趋于减小。然而,在肌张力低下组(1型和2型脊髓性肌萎缩症)和肌张力增高组(粗大运动功能分级系统IV级和V级)中,颈干角和头干角随年龄增长趋于增大。在肌张力低下和肌张力增高组中均观察到髋外翻。在评估股骨近端引导生长的效果时,应考虑这些明确的正常生长模式。
III级回顾性比较研究。