Lador Adi, Maccioni Sonia, Khanna Rahul, Zhang Dongyu
Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Franchise Health Economics and Market Access, Johnson & Johnson MedTech, Irvine, California.
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Aug 5;5(9):606-613. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.016. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are cardiac disorders that often coexist.
This study aimed to investigate how time to ablation could influence the outcomes of AF patients with pre-existing HF.
Using the 2013 to 2022 Optum Clinformatics database, AF patients with pre-existing HF were classified into 2 groups: early ablation (ablation within 6 months of AF diagnosis) and late ablation (ablation in the 6- to 24-month period after AF diagnosis). Outcomes including AF-related hospitalization, electrical cardioversion, repeat ablation, antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) use, and AF recurrence (a composite outcome of the aforementioned events) were assessed in the postblanking 24-month period. Inverse probability of treatment weighted Poisson regression estimated risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome.
Overall, 601 patients were identified (early ablation: 347; late ablation: 254). In 24 months, the weighted data suggested that patients in the early ablation cohort had significantly lower rate of composite outcome (49.32% vs 61.39%, .01), repeat ablation (8.56% vs 17.35%, .01), and AAD use (35.95% vs 47.92%, .01). Early ablation was associated with a 20%, 51%, and 25% lower risk of composite outcome (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.94), repeat ablation (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31-0.79), and AAD use (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.92), respectively. No significant difference in AF-related hospitalization and electrical cardioversion were observed.
AF patients with pre-existing HF undergoing ablation within 6 months of AF diagnosis have a lower risk of AF recurrence than those undergoing late ablation, which was evidenced by a lower rate of repeat ablation and AAD use.
心房颤动(AF)和心力衰竭(HF)是常常共存的心脏疾病。
本研究旨在调查消融时机如何影响已患有HF的AF患者的预后。
利用2013年至2022年Optum临床信息数据库,将已患有HF的AF患者分为两组:早期消融(AF诊断后6个月内进行消融)和晚期消融(AF诊断后6至24个月期间进行消融)。在24个月的空白期后评估包括AF相关住院、电复律、重复消融、抗心律失常药物(AAD)使用以及AF复发(上述事件的综合结果)等预后情况。采用治疗加权泊松回归的逆概率估计各预后的风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
总体上,共识别出601例患者(早期消融:347例;晚期消融:254例)。在24个月时,加权数据表明早期消融队列患者的综合结果发生率(49.32%对61.39%,P<0.01)、重复消融率(8.56%对17.35%,P<0.01)和AAD使用率(35.95%对47.92%,P<0.01)显著更低。早期消融分别与综合结果风险降低20%、重复消融风险降低51%和AAD使用风险降低25%相关(RR分别为0.80,95%CI为0.69 - 0.94;RR为0.49,95%CI为0.31 - 0.79;RR为0.75,95%CI为0.61 - 0.92)。未观察到AF相关住院和电复律的显著差异。
已患有HF的AF患者在AF诊断后6个月内接受消融,其AF复发风险低于晚期消融患者,这一点通过更低的重复消融率和AAD使用率得到证实。