Sessions Andrew J, May Heidi T, Crandall Brian G, Day John D, Cutler Michael J, Groh Christopher A, Navaravong Leenapong, Ranjan Ravi, Steinberg Benjamin A, J Bunch Thomas
University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Department of Cardiology, Intermountain Medical Center, Intermountain Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;34(3):507-515. doi: 10.1111/jce.15810. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia often comorbid with systolic or diastolic heart failure (HF). Catheter ablation is a more effective treatment for AF with concurrent left ventricular dysfunction, however, the optimal timing of use in these patients is unknown.
All patients that received a catheter ablation for AF(n = 9979) with 1 year of follow-up within the Intermountain Healthcare system were included. Patients with were identified by the presence of structural disease by ejection fraction (EF): EF ≤ 35% (n = 1024) and EF > 35% (n = 8955). Recursive partitioning categories were used to separate patients into clinically meaningful strata based upon time from initial AF diagnosis until ablation: 30-180(n = 2689), 2:181-545(n = 1747), 3:546-1825(n = 2941), and 4:>1825(n = 2602) days.
The mean days from AF diagnosis to first ablation was 3.5 ± 3.8 years (EF > 35%: 3.5 ± 3.8 years, EF ≤ 35%: 3.4 ± 3.8 years, p = .66). In the EF > 35% group, delays in treatment (181-545 vs. 30-180, 546-1825 vs. 30-180, >1825 vs. 30-180 days) increased the risk of death with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.02(p < .0001), 2.62(p < .0001), and 4.39(p < .0001) respectively with significant risks for HF hospitalization (HR:1.44-3.69), stroke (HR:1.11-2.14), and AF recurrence (HR:1.42-1.81). In patients with an EF ≤ 35%, treatment delays also significantly increased risk of death (HR 2.07-3.77) with similar trends in HF hospitalization (HR:1.63-1.09) and AF recurrence (HR:0.79-1.24).
Delays in catheter ablation for AF resulted in increased all-cause mortality in all patients with differential impact observed on HF hospitalization, stroke, and AF recurrence risks by baseline EF. These data favor earlier use of ablation for AF in patients with and without structural heart disease.
心房颤动(AF)是一种常见的心律失常,常与收缩性或舒张性心力衰竭(HF)合并存在。导管消融是治疗合并左心室功能不全的房颤更有效的方法,然而,这些患者的最佳使用时机尚不清楚。
纳入在山间医疗系统中接受导管消融治疗房颤(n = 9979)且随访1年的所有患者。根据射血分数(EF)确定有结构性疾病的患者:EF≤35%(n = 1024)和EF>35%(n = 8955)。使用递归划分类别根据从初始房颤诊断到消融的时间将患者分为具有临床意义的层次:30 - 180(n = 2689)、2:181 - 545(n = 1747)、3:546 - 1825(n = 2941)和4:>1825(n = 2602)天。
从房颤诊断到首次消融的平均天数为3.5±3.8年(EF>35%:3.5±3.8年,EF≤35%:3.4±3.8年,p = 0.66)。在EF>35%组中,治疗延迟(181 - 545天与30 - 180天、546 - 1825天与30 - 180天、>1825天与30 - 180天)增加了死亡风险,危险比(HR)分别为2.02(p<0.0001)、2.62(p<0.0001)和4.39(p<0.0001),同时心力衰竭住院(HR:1.44 - 3.69)、中风(HR:1.11 - 2.14)和房颤复发(HR:1.42 - 1.81)的风险显著增加。在EF≤35%的患者中,治疗延迟也显著增加了死亡风险(HR 2.07 - 3.77),心力衰竭住院(HR:1.63 - 1.09)和房颤复发(HR:0.79 - 1.24)有类似趋势。
房颤导管消融延迟导致所有患者全因死亡率增加,根据基线EF观察到对心力衰竭住院、中风和房颤复发风险有不同影响。这些数据支持在有和无结构性心脏病的患者中更早地对房颤使用消融治疗。