• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种广泛使用的植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的故障率极高且呈加速上升趋势:一项大规模、独立于制造商的多中心研究,随访时间长且数据准确。

Remarkably high and accelerating failure rate of a widely used implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead: A large-scale manufacturer-independent multicenter study with long accurate follow-up.

作者信息

Oosterwerff Erik F J, Theuns Dominic A M J, Maass Alexander H, van Erven Lieselot

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Jul 17;5(9):614-622. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.010. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.010
PMID:39493913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11524969/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A high annual failure rate of the Linox family defibrillator lead was reported in various small single-center studies. No independent multicenter long-term performance information exists for this lead.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to assess the longevity of the Linox family leads and to evaluate clinical variables and adverse events associated with failure.

METHODS

This 4-center study included adults >18 years of age who received Linox family leads for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. From November 2006 to November 2016, a total of 3993 high-voltage leads of the Linox family were implanted and followed up on.

RESULTS

The absolute failure rate was 10.6% (dwell time to lead failure of 6.3 ± 3.4 years). Multivariate analysis confirmed younger age (for every 5 years younger than 65 years) (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.14, < .001) and subclavian access (hazard ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.81, < .001) as independent risk factors for lead failure. Patients frequently presented themselves with inappropriate shocks (20% in patients with lead failure) due to detection of nonphysiologic high-rate signals/noise.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest physician-driven multicenter study on the very long-term performance of Linox family leads. Our data report a remarkably high failure rate of these leads. Our findings have significant implications for the management of patients. Monitoring by remote care should be available for all active Linox family leads.

摘要

背景

在各项小型单中心研究中报告了Linox系列除颤器导线的年度故障率较高。目前尚无关于该导线独立的多中心长期性能信息。

目的

我们的目的是评估Linox系列导线的使用寿命,并评估与故障相关的临床变量和不良事件。

方法

这项4中心研究纳入了年龄大于18岁、接受Linox系列导线以预防心源性猝死的成年人。从2006年11月至2016年11月,共植入并随访了3993根Linox系列高压导线。

结果

绝对故障率为10.6%(导线故障的驻留时间为6.3±3.4年)。多变量分析证实,年龄较小(每比65岁小5岁)(风险比1.09,95%置信区间1.05-1.14,P<0.001)和锁骨下途径(风险比1.46,95%置信区间1.18-1.81,P<0.001)是导线故障的独立危险因素。由于检测到非生理性高频率信号/噪音,患者经常出现不适当电击(导线故障患者中占20%)。

结论

这是关于Linox系列导线长期性能的最大规模的医生主导的多中心研究。我们的数据报告了这些导线非常高的故障率。我们的发现对患者管理具有重要意义。所有在用的Linox系列导线都应进行远程护理监测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3b5/11524969/ecc4d1f6faad/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3b5/11524969/ea8457b50278/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3b5/11524969/baf015ba9ef8/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3b5/11524969/226d86fb9bf7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3b5/11524969/ecc4d1f6faad/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3b5/11524969/ea8457b50278/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3b5/11524969/baf015ba9ef8/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3b5/11524969/226d86fb9bf7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3b5/11524969/ecc4d1f6faad/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Remarkably high and accelerating failure rate of a widely used implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead: A large-scale manufacturer-independent multicenter study with long accurate follow-up.一种广泛使用的植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的故障率极高且呈加速上升趋势:一项大规模、独立于制造商的多中心研究,随访时间长且数据准确。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Jul 17;5(9):614-622. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.010. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Performance of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead family.植入式心脏复律除颤器导线系列的性能
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;34(3):700-709. doi: 10.1111/jce.15804. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
3
Comparison of longevity and clinical outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads among manufacturers.比较不同制造商生产的植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的寿命和临床结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Oct;14(10):1496-1503. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 May 11.
4
Prospective Assessment of Linox Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads for Structural or Electrical Abnormalities.林克索可植入式心律转复除颤器导线的结构性或电异常的前瞻性评估。
Adv Ther. 2018 May;35(5):666-670. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0691-3. Epub 2018 May 5.
5
Performance of the Linox implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: A single-center experience.林诺克斯植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的性能:单中心经验。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Dec;42(12):1524-1528. doi: 10.1111/pace.13816. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
6
Comparative study of the failure rates among 3 implantable defibrillator leads.3种植入式除颤器导线故障率的比较研究
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Dec;13(12):2299-2305. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
7
Failure rate and conductor externalization in the Biotronik Linox/Sorin Vigila implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead.百多力Linox/索林Vigila植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的故障率及导线外露情况
Heart Rhythm. 2016 May;13(5):1075-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.12.038. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
8
Impact of fracture-prone implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads on long-term patient mortality.易发生骨折的植入式心脏复律除颤器导线对患者长期死亡率的影响。
J Arrhythm. 2023 Mar 26;39(3):454-463. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12843. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
Long-Term Evaluation of Biotronik Linox and Linox(smart) Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads.百多力Linox和Linox(智能型)植入式心律转复除颤器导线的长期评估
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Jun;27(6):735-42. doi: 10.1111/jce.12971. Epub 2016 May 3.
10
Long-term longevity and clinical outcomes of Linox S/SD implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: a single-center experience.Linox S/SD植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的长期寿命及临床结果:单中心经验
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Jun;61(1):115-121. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00787-x. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead family.植入式心脏复律除颤器导线系列的性能
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;34(3):700-709. doi: 10.1111/jce.15804. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
2
Reduction in long-term mortality using remote device monitoring in a large real-world population of patients with implantable defibrillators.在植入式除颤器的大型真实世界患者群体中使用远程设备监测降低长期死亡率。
Europace. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):969-977. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac280.
3
Early Experience with the Biotronik Protego ICD Lead.
百多力Protego植入式心律转复除颤器导线的早期经验
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 29;11(23):7070. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237070.
4
New European Union law on medical devices: will it truly protect patients from malfunctioning cardiac implantable electronic devices?欧盟关于医疗器械的新法律:它真的能保护患者免受心脏植入式电子设备故障的影响吗?
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 Jan 5;8(1):1-3. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab064.
5
Dutch Outcome in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy: Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator-Related Complications in a Contemporary Primary Prevention Cohort.荷兰植入型心律转复除颤器治疗结果:当代一级预防队列中与植入型心律转复除颤器相关的并发症。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Apr 6;10(7):e018063. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018063. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
6
Comparison of the performance of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads among manufacturers.比较不同制造商的植入式心脏转复除颤器导线的性能。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;58(2):133-139. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00640-w. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
7
Nationwide Longitudinal Follow-Up of Riata Leads Under Advisory at 3 Annual Screenings: Report From the Netherlands Heart Rhythm Association Device Advisory Committee.全国范围内对 3 次年度筛查时接受咨询的 Riata 导联的长期随访:荷兰心律协会设备咨询委员会的报告。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Aug;3(8):887-893. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.12.011. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
8
Long-term single-center comparison of ICD lead survival: Evidence for premature Linox lead failure.长期单中心 ICD 导线生存比较:Linox 导线早期失效的证据。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 Jul;29(7):1024-1031. doi: 10.1111/jce.13502. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
9
Non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, sudden death and implantable defibrillators: a review and meta-analysis.非缺血性心肌病、心源性猝死和植入式除颤器:综述和荟萃分析。
Heart. 2018 Jan;104(2):144-150. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310850. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
10
Comparison of longevity and clinical outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads among manufacturers.比较不同制造商生产的植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的寿命和临床结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Oct;14(10):1496-1503. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 May 11.