• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心耳封堵术与 Watchman 装置和 Amulet 装置:相似与不同。

Left Atrial Appendage Closure with Watchman vs Amulet Devices: Similarities and Differences.

机构信息

Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, Overland Park, KS, USA.

出版信息

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Sep;25(9):909-915. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01913-7. Epub 2023 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1007/s11886-023-01913-7
PMID:37584874
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has shown to be non-inferior to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). LAAC is now becoming a leading method for stroke prophylaxis in patients who have atrial fibrillation and are unable to tolerate OAC. There are currently two FDA-approved endocardial closure devices, namely, the Watchman FLX and Amplatzer Amulet.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current data highlights that both devices offer similar efficacy and safety for LAAC. While the two devices differ in terms of intraprocedural complication rates, they offer similar short- to long-term outcomes in regard to peri-device leaks, device-related thrombosis, and mortality. With similar risk and safety profiles, both devices are indicated for patients who are unable to tolerate OAC. Newer clinical studies are directed to establish the efficacy of both devices as the primary method for stroke prevention in AF as an alternate to OAC.

摘要

目的综述

左心耳封堵术(LAAC)在非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)患者中已被证明不劣于口服抗凝药(OAC)。LAAC 现在已成为不能耐受 OAC 的房颤患者预防中风的主要方法。目前有两种获得 FDA 批准的心脏内封堵装置,即 Watchman FLX 和 Amplatzer Amulet。

最新发现

目前的数据强调,这两种装置在 LAAC 中的疗效和安全性相似。尽管两种装置在术中并发症发生率方面有所不同,但在器械相关漏、器械相关血栓形成和死亡率方面,它们提供了相似的短期至长期结果。鉴于相似的风险和安全性特征,两种装置均适用于不能耐受 OAC 的患者。新的临床研究旨在确定这两种装置作为替代 OAC 的 AF 预防中风的主要方法的疗效。

相似文献

1
Left Atrial Appendage Closure with Watchman vs Amulet Devices: Similarities and Differences.左心耳封堵术与 Watchman 装置和 Amulet 装置:相似与不同。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Sep;25(9):909-915. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01913-7. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
2
Safety and efficacy of percutaneous Watchman 2.5 device versus Amplatzer Amulet for left atrial appendage closure in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and study-level meta-analysis.经皮 Watchman 2.5 装置与 Amplatzer Amulet 用于非瓣膜性心房颤动患者左心耳封堵的安全性和有效性:系统评价和研究水平荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 14;19(2):e0295804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295804. eCollection 2024.
3
Watchman vs. Amulet for Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.用于左心耳封堵的Watchman与Amulet:当前证据及未来展望
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 8;13(16):4651. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164651.
4
Clinical efficacy and safety comparison of Watchman device versus ACP/Amulet device for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A study-level meta-analysis of clinical trials.经皮左心耳封堵术治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中 Watchman 装置与 ACP/Amulet 装置的临床疗效和安全性比较:临床试验的研究水平荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Feb;46(2):117-125. doi: 10.1002/clc.23956. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
5
Latest outcomes of transcatheter left atrial appendage closure devices and direct oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation over the past 5 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.过去5年经导管左心耳封堵装置及直接口服抗凝药治疗心房颤动患者的最新结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022 Oct;37(4):725-738. doi: 10.1007/s12928-022-00839-1. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
6
Comparison between Amplatzer and Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.比较 Amplatzer 和 Watchman 左心耳封堵装置在预防房颤卒中的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiology. 2022;147(3):290-297. doi: 10.1159/000524626. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
7
5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials.左心耳封堵术后 5 年的结果:来自 PREVAIL 和 PROTECT AF 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 19;70(24):2964-2975. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
8
Short term outcome after left atrial appendage occlusion with the AMPLATZER Amulet and WATCHMAN device: results from the ORIGINAL registry (saxOnian RegIstry analyzinG and followINg left atrial Appendage cLosure).Amulet 和 WATCHMAN 装置行左心耳封堵术的短期预后:ORIGINAL 注册研究(saxOnian 注册研究分析和随访左心耳封堵术)结果。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Jun 16;22(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02708-4.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Reduction in Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of Pooled, 5-Year, Long-Term Data.左心耳封堵术降低房颤患者卒中风险的成本效果分析:汇总 5 年长期数据。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jul 2;8(13):e011577. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011577. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
10
Left atrial appendage closure - Current status and future directions.左心耳封堵术——现状与未来方向。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Nov-Dec;69:101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.11.013. Epub 2021 Nov 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Antithrombotic Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.房颤患者左心耳封堵术后的抗血栓治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 10;79(18):1785-1798. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.047.
2
Comparison between Amplatzer and Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.比较 Amplatzer 和 Watchman 左心耳封堵装置在预防房颤卒中的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiology. 2022;147(3):290-297. doi: 10.1159/000524626. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
3
Response by Lakireddy et al to Letters Regarding Article, "Amplatzer Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Versus Watchman Device for Stroke Prophylaxis (Amulet IDE): A Randomized, Controlled Trial".
拉基雷迪等人对关于“用于预防中风的Amplatzer Amulet左心耳封堵器与Watchman装置对比(Amulet IDE):一项随机对照试验”一文的信件的回应
Circulation. 2022 Apr 26;145(17):e850-e851. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059423. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
4
Procedural and short-term follow-up outcomes of Amplatzer Amulet occluder versus Watchman FLX device: A meta-analysis.Amplatzer Amulet封堵器与Watchman FLX装置的手术及短期随访结果:一项荟萃分析。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jun;19(6):1017-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
5
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Using the Novel Amplatzer Steerable Delivery Sheath Combine With FEops HEARTguide.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 8;14(21):e301-e304. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.055. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
6
Temporal Changes and Clinical Implications of Delayed Peridevice Leak Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure.左心耳封堵术后延迟器械周围漏的时间变化及临床意义。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Jan;8(1):15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
7
Peridevice Leak Following Amplatzer Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Cardiac Computed Tomography Classification and Clinical Outcomes.Amplatzer左心耳封堵术后的装置周围渗漏:心脏计算机断层扫描分类及临床结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 11;14(1):83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.034.
8
Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants in High-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.左心耳封堵术与直接口服抗凝剂在伴有心房颤动的高危患者中的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 30;75(25):3122-3135. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.067.
9
The NCDR Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Registry.NCDR 左心耳封堵器械注册研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Apr 7;75(13):1503-1518. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.040.
10
Role of the Left Atrial Appendage in Systemic Homeostasis, Arrhythmogenesis, and Beyond.左心耳在全身内环境稳定、心律失常发生和其他方面的作用。
Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2020 Mar;12(1):21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2019.11.004.