Impact of the Covid19 pandemic on health-related quality of life in patients with Fabry disease - implications for future care of patients with rare diseases.

BACKGROUND

The worldwide Covid19 pandemic caused by the rapid spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) represented a unique challenge for patients and healthcare professionals. Patients with chronic rare diseases had to face novel burdens, like the inability to perform regular on-site visits or even difficulties in the supply of medication. Patients with Fabry disease (FD) are affected by a variety of organ manifestations leading to physical but also psychological burden and limitations, which are usually presented in low health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). We sought to examine the impact of the Covid19 pandemic on HR-QoL in patients with FD and their implications for the future care of patients with rare diseases.

METHODS

This single-center study included patients seen shortly prior to and after the peak of the Covid19 pandemic in 2020 at our study site. All patients had a confirmed genetic diagnosis of FD. Subjects with presumed apathogenic to benigne genetic variants in the GLA gene were excluded. The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) was used to obtain patients'self-reported outcome. Clinical data and SF-36 scores were collected and analysed for the time period prior to and after the peak of the pandemic.

RESULTS

In total, 60 patients (mean age 47.9 ± 15 years, 53.3 % male) were included. The majority presented with a pathogenic gene variant (63.3 %) associated with classic phenotype. At baseline, 66.7 % were on enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), and 21.7 % on chaperone therapy. Predominant organ manifestations were cardiac (42/60, 70.0 %) and neurological (39/60, 65.0 %). After paired comparison prior and post peak of the pandemic in 2020, all eight items of the SF-36 score showed a numeric decline. Three items presented with a intergroup difference: social functioning (72.5 ± 29.3 vs. 64.8 ± 29.3,  = 0.012), energy/fatigue (56.8 ± 21.7 vs. 48.3 ± 23.9,  < 0.001), and role limitations due to physical health (64.2 ± 42.0 vs. 51.1 ± 45.5,  = 0.007).Subgroup analysis (regarding gender, age, and treatment) revealed that especially male and older (≥50 years) patients with FD showed reductions in multiple categories of HR-QoL. The item "energy/fatigue" presented significant declines among all subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The worldwide Covid19 pandemic had a persistent negative affect on self-reported HR-QoL in patients with FD, including both mental and physical aspects. It remains unclear to what extend the disease itself and accompanying circumstances including local and governmental actions and restrictions contributed to these deteriorations. Our findings stress the importance for meticulous and constant interdisciplinary care including psychosocial aspects in patients with chronic progressive diseases as well as the need for a change in mindset concerning future medical care including further progress in digitalisation and a strengthening of the remote health care sector by authorities.